Hi all
I just have a sugguestion about the pkg format.
Currently archlinux is using gzip compress method to pack the
package, I think it is better to use bzip2. since bzip2 format
can save about 10%-20% disk space than gzip.
As I know, FreeBSD has already switch its package format from gzip
to
Aaron Griffin wrote:
I stopped paying attention days ago. *mark-as-read*. This is a
technical list, thus inline or bottom posting is preferred. It's a
fact. There doesn't even need to be a discussion.
It wasn't my intention to start a discussion, I didn't want that thread
to grow that big.
I
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:03 AM, gnu2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 20:01 +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have recently seen the new feature of the initscripts, where the
> waiting
> > time for uevents settling is being reported. So since we are all
I thought this whole thread was tongue in cheek (read: A giant
purposeful joke).
I missed the first serveral emails in this thread, and didn't even
realize people were actually being serious until i (just now) read the
replies after my original email.
Then I laughed.
On 5/19/08, Aaron Griffin <[EM
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As has been stated, this has already gotten too involved, but one
I stopped paying attention days ago. *mark-as-read*. This is a
technical list, thus inline or bottom posting is preferred. It's a
fact. There doesn't even need to b
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 04:08:14AM +0300, Mordechai Peller wrote:
> Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> >We might argue if it's a mail client's fault or user's
> "Why yes, I just so happened to be holding the gun and pulling the trigger
> when
> it went off. But honestly, it was the gun's fault. If the m
Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
We might argue if it's a mail client's fault or user's
"Why yes, I just so happened to be holding the gun and pulling the
trigger when it went off. But honestly, it was the gun's fault. If the
manufacture hadn't designed the gun to fire the bullet, none of this
would
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
And similarly, I find bottom posting a bit annoying, as I'm often
forced to scroll down to read what the most recent commenter wrote.
(Though, obviously, that's really an outgrowth of bottom-posters
violating the "trimming" rule, rather than a problem with
bottom-pos
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 20:01 +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have recently seen the new feature of the initscripts, where the waiting
> time for uevents settling is being reported. So since we are all interested
> in booting speed, what are the times being reported for your
On Thursday 15 May 2008 21:21:21 Xavier wrote:
> http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
>
> What about using a consistent style, at least for one given ML?
> arch-general is really painful to read sometimes.
>
> Thanks!
Well, as far as my research has lead me to, the answer is here: RFC 1
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And then theres also html emails. I wonder if there is easy way to not
> accept non plain text emails. I know some lists have that feature.
HTML emails are an abomination. I think mailman lets me block them. I
can fin
See?
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:57:44PM +, Jon Kristian Nilsen wrote:
> >My point being, and I see your point, but there will be
> >More people coming to this list who doesn't know about that rule, and
>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:57:44PM +, Jon Kristian Nilsen wrote:
>My point being, and I see your point, but there will be
>More people coming to this list who doesn't know about that rule, and
>forcing this upon users would imho be a painfull experience.
>Mailclients do this in
My point being, and I see your point, but there will be
More people coming to this list who doesn't know about that rule, and
forcing this upon users would imho be a painfull experience.
Mailclients do this in different ways, and I don't think all old/new users
will be taking it to their attention.
On Monday 19 May 2008 22:30:12 Xavier wrote:
> If you follow the rule, then you should to same here on this ML.
> If you don't, you die.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22died+in+a+top+posting+accident%22
mhm
--
best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
Jon Kristian Nilsen wrote:
I blame email clients, not the poster.
I blame both. What's your point?
If you had to use a british car in France, on which side of the road
would you drive?
If you follow the rule, then you should to same here on this ML.
If you don't, you die.
I blame email clients, not the poster.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:57 PM, jason maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Personally I don't really care that much which way people post, but as
>> there's a good number of very vocal "bottom posting police" :-) types in the
>> FOSS community tha
I just realised that rafb has removed my paste,
PKGBUILD - http://pastebin.ca/1023104
makepkg log - http://pastebin.ca/1023108
And here's the log from running ''sudo python setup.py install' -
http://pastebin.ca/1023112
The manual way installs it the way it should, with the backends.
On Sun, May
>
> [snip]
> Personally I don't really care that much which way people post, but as
> there's a good number of very vocal "bottom posting police" :-) types in the
> FOSS community that often raise a ruckus when you top post, I generally just
> try to conform and bottom post in the interests of keep
Hello list,
I have recently seen the new feature of the initscripts, where the waiting
time for uevents settling is being reported. So since we are all interested
in booting speed, what are the times being reported for your computer?
Let me start with a P3 800MHz I have running arch.
Normal
Jon B wrote:
I'll be the weird one and admit that I find
top-postings to be easier to read. But just because I
like all of you, I'll type way down here. :)
-jb
You're not the only weird one. To me, the most recent comments are
what's most important, and if I'm interested in the background t
I tend to post all over the place.
On 5/19/08, Callan Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> THIS THREAD IS HILARIOUS!
I agree.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Justin Gx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gan lu wrote:
> > I hope I can, or I will report a bug for tracking, thanks.
> >
>
> Not being able to translate the installer into your language proper does
> not qualify as a bug. It would be best if you left the bug tracker
On Mon 2008-05-19 11:22 , Justin Gx wrote:
> gan lu wrote:
> > I hope I can, or I will report a bug for tracking, thanks.
> >
>
> Not being able to translate the installer into your language proper does
> not qualify as a bug. It would be best if you left the bug tracker for
> tracking serious, *
gan lu wrote:
> I hope I can, or I will report a bug for tracking, thanks.
>
Not being able to translate the installer into your language proper does
not qualify as a bug. It would be best if you left the bug tracker for
tracking serious, *real*, bugs - like systems that freeze for no
apparent re
Hi
I use my sony-ericsson k750 cell phone as gprs modem. It runs well
with the usb cable and wvdial, I didn't try it over bluetooth.
Regards,
Rodland.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:40 AM, BaSh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/19 Arvid Ephraim Picciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi,
>> Unfortunatly
On Monday 19 May 2008 01:38:08 Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> Hi,
> Unfortunatly i need to travel a lot recently.
> For windows you can use those pcmia cards that act as a modem for umts/gprs
> connections.
> If anyone tried something like that on linux, please share your experience.
> Maybe i cou
THIS THREAD IS HILARIOUS!
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:57:03AM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> Jon B wrote:
>
>
>> ...some people top posting even in the same thread) made it harder to
>> read.
>>
>> That said, we indeed have to pick one..
28 matches
Mail list logo
