Re: [arch-general] apache-/httpd-config files (was: [arch-dev-public] cleaned-up apache package)

2008-06-25 Thread RedShift
Finkregh wrote: On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:31:50 +0200 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Btw: does anybody know why the previous maintainer has used /etc/httpd/conf instead of /etc/httpd? Why is that directory used at all? Doesn't it make more sense to use something like '/etc/apache/'

[arch-general] apache-/httpd-config files (was: [arch-dev-public] cleaned-up apache package)

2008-06-25 Thread Finkregh
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:31:50 +0200 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Btw: does anybody know why the previous maintainer has > used /etc/httpd/conf instead of /etc/httpd? Why is that directory used at all? Doesn't it make more sense to use something like '/etc/apache/' like e.g. lightt

Re: [arch-general] Could not upload nxcomp package to AUR

2008-06-25 Thread Gerhard Brauer
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:05:24PM +0800, Callan Barrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I try to upload a package named nxcomp to AUR (Section lib), but it's > > revoked: > > You are not allowed to overwrite the nxcomp package. > > But i don'

Re: [arch-general] Could not upload nxcomp package to AUR

2008-06-25 Thread Callan Barrett
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > another question: > > I try to upload a package named nxcomp to AUR (Section lib), but it's > revoked: > You are not allowed to overwrite the nxcomp package. > > But i don't found such a package in AUR nor with

[arch-general] Could not upload nxcomp package to AUR

2008-06-25 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Hello, another question: I try to upload a package named nxcomp to AUR (Section lib), but it's revoked: You are not allowed to overwrite the nxcomp package. But i don't found such a package in AUR nor with pacman -Ss nxcomp. Any hints? Regards Gerhard -- MSCI = M$cro Soft Certificat

Re: [arch-general] AUR Tarball format (makepkg --source)

2008-06-25 Thread Gerhard Brauer
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:24:00PM +0800, Callan Barrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > is it possible to upload a package to AUR which is build with: > > makepkg --source ? > > I think not (package naming and no package subdir in tarball

Re: [arch-general] AUR Tarball format (makepkg --source)

2008-06-25 Thread vlad
hi, On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote: > Hello, > > is it possible to upload a package to AUR which is build with: > makepkg --source ? > I think not (package naming and no package subdir in tarball), but this > were be a nice feature ;-) > > Regards > Gerhard

Re: [arch-general] AUR Tarball format (makepkg --source)

2008-06-25 Thread Callan Barrett
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > is it possible to upload a package to AUR which is build with: > makepkg --source ? > I think not (package naming and no package subdir in tarball), but this > were be a nice feature ;-) > > Regards >Ger

Re: [arch-general] AUR Tarball format (makepkg --source)

2008-06-25 Thread Allan McRae
Gerhard Brauer wrote: Hello, is it possible to upload a package to AUR which is build with: makepkg --source ? I think not (package naming and no package subdir in tarball), but this were be a nice feature ;-) Regards Gerhard I believe it is, but if not the package subdir will be

[arch-general] AUR Tarball format (makepkg --source)

2008-06-25 Thread Gerhard Brauer
Hello, is it possible to upload a package to AUR which is build with: makepkg --source ? I think not (package naming and no package subdir in tarball), but this were be a nice feature ;-) Regards Gerhard -- rm -rf DOESN'T mean: read mail -really fast