Andrei Thorp wrote:
> I like this guy :)
>
> You've shown yourself to be indeed an awesome community member.
> Thanks, and I hope that Arch continues to make you happy. And I agree,
> I always thought Arch would do well for a server if you take
> precautions around updates.
>
> :)
>
> -Andrei "G
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
The gcc-4.4.0 toolchain rebuild is now in [testing]. Here is a rough
ChangeLog:
>
Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi all,
The gcc-4.4.0 toolchain rebuild is now in [testing]. Here is a rough
ChangeLog:
Awesome, Thanks
I will build some things in a chroot, to see how it behaves.
glibc:
I like this guy :)
You've shown yourself to be indeed an awesome community member.
Thanks, and I hope that Arch continues to make you happy. And I agree,
I always thought Arch would do well for a server if you take
precautions around updates.
:)
-Andrei "Garoth" Thorp
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:
Guys,
Thanks for all of your help. My first Arch install and server config is
almost
100% complete (some server apps still remain, but that's just install time)
Archlinux works like a champ. It is a great, lightweight, full featured
distribution.
In case any other Arch user is lo
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> wrote:
>
>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The gcc-4.4.0 toolchain rebuild is now in [testing]. Here is a rough
>>> ChangeLog:
>>>
>> Awesome, Thanks
>> I will build some things in a chroot, to
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The gcc-4.4.0 toolchain rebuild is now in [testing]. Here is a rough
>> ChangeLog:
> Awesome, Thanks
> I will build some things in a chroot, to see how it behaves.
>>
>> glibc:
>>
> One note here,
Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The gcc-4.4.0 toolchain rebuild is now in [testing]. Here is a rough
> ChangeLog:
Awesome, Thanks
I will build some things in a chroot, to see how it behaves.
>
> glibc:
>
One note here, (low priority): in the ".install" post_upgrade() there is
a line "init u". If
2009/4/25 Pierre Schmitz :
> Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 17:36:19 schrieb Dan McGee:
>> Installing into srv is no different than installing into /home/,
>> IMO. It might be worse as it presents a relatively big security risk
>> for those that do run public facing services, and suddenly a new
>> scri
Very nice to have a laywer around the mailing lists though... :)
-AT
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Attila wrote:
> On Samstag, 25. April 2009 08:02 Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> No. Only the ones where it is unclear if we can legally distribute it.
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> See you, Atti
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 17:36:19 schrieb Dan McGee:
>
>> Installing into srv is no different than installing into /home/,
>> IMO. It might be worse as it presents a relatively big security risk
>> for those that do run public facing services, and suddenly a new
>> scri
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:19:58 -0400
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:49, wrote:
> > Hmm, but thunar-volman is not installed on my system..
> >
> > Regards,
> > Philipp
> >
>
> Hmmm... I guess I don't know the software as well as I thought I did.
> I thought that addon was what
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:49, wrote:
> Hmm, but thunar-volman is not installed on my system..
>
> Regards,
> Philipp
>
Hmmm... I guess I don't know the software as well as I thought I did.
I thought that addon was what managed removable devices
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Baho Utot schrieb:
This is the error when built with gcc-4.3
[putolin]
Hmm, looks like this hasn't been rebuilt in over a year. Thanks for
the hint.
capi4k-utils and libnl are the only packages that don't build in the
core repos
Baho Utot schrieb:
This is the error when built with gcc-4.3
MAKE libnl.so.1.1
CC addr.c
In file included from addr.c:28:
../include/netlink-local.h: In function '__str2type':
../include/netlink-local.h:218: error: 'ULONG_MAX' undeclared (first use
in this function)
../include/netlink-local.h:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:13:01 -0400
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 04:20, wrote:
> > Well, it didn't unmount the thumbdrive and gave me the popup that
> > said that libnotify was missing so I'd say missing depend. But
> > otherwise thunar worked, and we have a number of packages
This is the error when built with gcc-4.3
MAKE libnl.so.1.1
CC addr.c
In file included from addr.c:28:
../include/netlink-local.h: In function '__str2type':
../include/netlink-local.h:218: error: 'ULONG_MAX' undeclared (first use
in this function)
../include/netlink-local.h:218: error: (Each un
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 04:20, wrote:
> Well, it didn't unmount the thumbdrive and gave me the popup that said
> that libnotify was missing so I'd say missing depend. But otherwise
> thunar worked, and we have a number of packages where part of the
> functionality is broken without the optdepends
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:59:00 -0700
Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Was it a warning or an error? If it was just a warning and thunar did
> the right thing regardless, it sounds like it's a missing optdepends
> as you say. If it actually stopped working or was hindered in some
> way, it's probably a missing
On Samstag, 25. April 2009 08:02 Allan McRae wrote:
> No. Only the ones where it is unclear if we can legally distribute it.
Thanks for the information.
See you, Attila
David C. Rankin wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Attila wrote:
Hi,
i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this
informations:
"This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have
to move
it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this
Allan McRae wrote:
> Attila wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this
>> informations:
>>
>> "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have
>> to move
>> it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this
>> issue th
22 matches
Mail list logo
