Re: [arch-general] Alsa state and my front speakers

2009-05-05 Thread Magnus Therning
Please disregard this. I had forgotten to stick `alsa` in DAEMONS in `/etc/rc.con`. It's too early! :-) /M Magnus Therning wrote: I had no problems at all configuring the basic setup for Alsa, everything worked perfect. At the end I issued `alsactl store` and rebooted hoping that my setti

[arch-general] Alsa state and my front speakers

2009-05-05 Thread Magnus Therning
I had no problems at all configuring the basic setup for Alsa, everything worked perfect. At the end I issued `alsactl store` and rebooted hoping that my settings would be restored on boot. They were, almost; all settings except the unmute of the front speakers. This forces me to go in and u

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Dan McGee
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, wrote: > the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a > smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of vim/gvim > while vi sits in testing. > > Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before, actually it's le

Re: [arch-general] kde control center "Use my KDE style in GTK applications" causes ooo buttons to disappear

2009-05-05 Thread Adriano Moura
I had some of these problems, it seems that going to "Appearence & Themes" > Colors and unchecking "Apply colors to non KDE applications" fixes some weired color and flat pannels (no gradients at all) problems. Now, the icon and menus problem should be caused by the gtk-qt-engine AND an specific t

Re: [arch-general] kde control center "Use my KDE style in GTK applications" causes ooo buttons to disappear

2009-05-05 Thread Ondřej Kučera
Hi, David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: The problem seems to have started after changing the kde control center setting for "Appearance & Themes" -> "GTK Styles and Fonts" -> "Use my KDE style in GTK applications". I just confirmed this on an X86_64 box that I had not made this setting on. I op

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] jfsutils 1.1.14-1

2009-05-05 Thread ludovic coues
2009/5/3, Tobias Powalowski : > Hi > update to latest version, please signoff for both arches. > > greetings > tpowa > -- > Tobias Powalowski > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > http://www.archlinux.org > tp...@archlinux.org > > > > > > > > >

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Thomas Bohn
On 2009-05-05 19:20 +0200, tob...@justdreams.de wrote: > the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a > smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of > vim/gvim while vi sits in testing. I know that. That is why I'm asking. Either nvi or Vim. Bot

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread tobias
the current vi package is actually nvi, the purpose of that was to have a smaller package for core that also would not stall any updates of vim/gvim while vi sits in testing. Th vim package is not uglier then it used to be before, actually it's less complex now because I don['t have to cate

Re: [arch-general] kde control center "Use my KDE style in GTK applications" causes ooo buttons to disappear

2009-05-05 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 11:47:35 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. wrote: > Listmates, > > I have an interesting one for you, in openOffice, all of the icons on > the > toolbars and all of the text of the context menus disappear when I click on > a document in writer. If I brush the mouse over the t

[arch-general] kde control center "Use my KDE style in GTK applications" causes ooo buttons to disappear

2009-05-05 Thread David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Listmates, I have an interesting one for you, in openOffice, all of the icons on the toolbars and all of the text of the context menus disappear when I click on a document in writer. If I brush the mouse over the toolbar or menu, the icons/text reappears while the icon or text has focu

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Thomas Bohn
On 2009-05-05 00:22 -0700, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > Finally, the new vi* packages are up. Why not letting Vim replace nvi entirely, the Vim package looks kinda ugly now. Thomas

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Tobias Kieslich
On Tue, 05 May 2009, bs wrote: > > hello, > as a linux newbie i am a little confused about the "sudo rm > /usr/bin/{view/rview}" command. typing it with the "{}"s does not > work, file or directory not found. am i supposed to delete > /usr/bin/view (which is a link)? i am probably missing somethi

Re: [arch-general] org.freedesktop.hal.storage.mount-removable no <-- (action, result)

2009-05-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Denis A. Altoé Falqueto schrieb: Edit /etc/pam.d/kde and append: session optionalpam_ck_connector.so It is the same as to start the session with ck_start (or something like that :)). Apparently, pam_ck_connector is braindead and last time I tried, it didn't work as expected (that m

Re: [arch-general] Corruption with new intel driver

2009-05-05 Thread Rafa Griman
Hi :) On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:43:58 李业 wrote: > The new X server will automatically load dri2 if you don't explicitly > define dri in load module section, and dri2 needs uxa. So if you try > to use dri+uxa or dri2+exa, X server would hang up just like you > described. I met the same problem l

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Andrei Thorp
Yay, thanks. -AT On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, bs wrote: >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration >>> pain. For optimal results, I

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, bs wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration >> pain. For optimal results, I recommend to "sudo rm /usr/bin/{view/rview}" >> before you run "sudo pacman -Syu"

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Jan de Groot
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 15:11 +0200, bs wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration > > pain. For optimal results, I recommend to "sudo rm /usr/bin/{view/rview}" > > before you run "sudo pacman

Re: [arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread bs
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > Hi, > > Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration > pain. For optimal results, I recommend to "sudo rm /usr/bin/{view/rview}" > before you run "sudo pacman -Syu" > >        -T > hello, as a linux newbie i am a l

Re: [arch-general] xorg crash with setxkbmap frequently use

2009-05-05 Thread Sergey Manucharian
On Tue, 5 May 2009 14:57:23 +0300 Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: > This is a bug with xkbcomp and it has been reported upstream long ago. > There is a redhat/fedora bug report [1] (which has been closed, but > the fix didn't work) and a freedesktop.org bug report [2], both > assigned to Peter Hutterer

Re: [arch-general] xorg crash with setxkbmap frequently use

2009-05-05 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Sergey Manucharian (2009-05-04 22:42): > Hi folks, > > X server crashes randomly with the following error: > > [xkb] BOGUS LENGTH in write keyboard desc, expected 5576, got 5592 > > Graphic card is Intel G965, driver xf86-video-intel, tried both from > [extra] and [testing]. > > I'm using the

Re: [arch-general] org.freedesktop.hal.storage.mount-removable no <-- (action, result)

2009-05-05 Thread Francesco Groccia
2009-05-05 12:40+0200, Francesco Groccia wrote: > it's works as well. :) sorry, my mistake. Was: "it works as well".

Re: [arch-general] org.freedesktop.hal.storage.mount-removable no <-- (action, result)

2009-05-05 Thread Francesco Groccia
2009-05-04 18:04+0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Don't modify any policykit or hal configurations, they are fine. I've got some doubt about his ability to do his job. In my case, I have to modify «/etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf» like this: Perhaps, it's a brutal choice but it's wor

Re: [arch-general] Why do I have 20-ups-nut-device.fdi in my / dir?

2009-05-05 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2009/5/5 Ondřej Kučera : > Hi, > > Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: >> >> 2009/5/5 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. : >>> >>> Listmates, >>> >>>       Picking around with mc, I saw a file that looked really out of >>> place. In my / >>> dir, I have 20-ups-nut-device.fdi. Shouldn't that be in >>> /etc/hal/fdi/polic

Re: [arch-general] Why do I have 20-ups-nut-device.fdi in my / dir?

2009-05-05 Thread Ondřej Kučera
Hi, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: 2009/5/5 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. : Listmates, Picking around with mc, I saw a file that looked really out of place. In my / dir, I have 20-ups-nut-device.fdi. Shouldn't that be in /etc/hal/fdi/policy/. I plead the 5th, I don't know how it got there. This i

Re: [arch-general] Why do I have 20-ups-nut-device.fdi in my / dir?

2009-05-05 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2009/5/5 David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. : > Listmates, > >        Picking around with mc, I saw a file that looked really out of place. > In my / > dir, I have 20-ups-nut-device.fdi. Shouldn't that be in /etc/hal/fdi/policy/. > I plead the 5th, I don't know how it got there. This is on my x86_64 box.

[arch-general] New vi/vim/gvim in testing requires intervention

2009-05-05 Thread Tobias Kieslich
Hi, Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration pain. For optimal results, I recommend to "sudo rm /usr/bin/{view/rview}" before you run "sudo pacman -Syu" -T