On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:07 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> >> Baho Utot wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
> >>>
> >>> Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
> >>>
Baho Utot wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r rulelist | --rules=rulelist] [-i | --info]
package ..
-r li
I am try ing to build gmine and get this error
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gmime-2.2.21/src'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gmime-2.2.21/src'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gmime-2.2.21/src'
Making install in mono
make[
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
> >
> > Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
> > usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r rulelist | --rules=rulelist] [-i | --info]
> > package ..
> >-r list
Baho Utot wrote:
I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r rulelist | --rules=rulelist] [-i | --info]
package ..
-r list: returns list of available rules
-i : prints information re
I have install namcap to my clean chroot and it gives me this error:
Error: Problem reading *.pkg.tar.gz
usage: /usr/bin/namcap [-r rulelist | --rules=rulelist] [-i | --info]
package ..
-r list: returns list of available rules
-i : prints information responses from rules
Jan de Groot schrieb:
Usually glibc and libstdc++ are backwards compatible. ABI doesn't change
so programs compiled against older versions will always work with newer
libraries.
It's about forward compatibility. If you compile a program with a newer
libstdc++, it will often not work with an ol
Stiler (in AUR) allows tiling within openbox. I find it to be quite a
nice program in conjunction with xbindkeys.
Ben
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> I come from a place where they say, "Friends don't let friends use
> non-tiling window managers" ;)
>
> As such, while we're
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:08 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:00 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > ==> Finished making: vorbis-tools 1.2.0-3 i686 (Thu Jun 11 10:56:54 CEST
> > 2009)
> >
> > Did you remove srcdir?
> > autoconf 2.63-1
>
> > > build()
> > > {
> > > cd $startdi
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:00 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> ==> Finished making: vorbis-tools 1.2.0-3 i686 (Thu Jun 11 10:56:54 CEST 2009)
>
> Did you remove srcdir?
> autoconf 2.63-1
>
> On 11/06/2009, Baho Utot wrote:
> > vorbis-tools gives me the following error
> >
> > -> bsdtar -x -f vorb
> +1 for dwm/dmenu. I really like grouping by tags.
Awesome certainly has tag-based management, and Xmonad probably also
does considering it was a DWM clone once. In Awesome, at least,
dmenu's pretty much obsoleted by Awesome's own built-in panels and
tags have been taken much further than dwm d
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:52:11AM +0800, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> dwm[0] is a great place to start as well, especially if you're
> familiar with C and can patch it to your liking. The defaults are
> perfectly fine (besides colours), though, and once you get your head
> around tag-based window manag
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Andrew Przepioski wrote:
> Damn, that's a nice story! That's probably how it all went down. ;)
Yeah :D
Or maybe the art guy saw the logo on the background of a web
developer's computer ;)
-AT
> If you have a lot of terminals, a tabbed or split-screen terminal app, like
> Konsole or Terminator is probably more efficient.
Disagreed, tiling window managers are entirely designed for tiling
stuff. They tend to be _much_ better at it than stuff like screen and
Terminator. I'm pretty confiden
> Just to crush the urban myth that gets mentioned more than it should be
> recently: xmonad is not based on dwm. Yes, the idea of what should it do came
> from dwm, but it was written from scratch (in haskell, no C code ever).
Ah, understood. I think I read something about this like it's "based"
> I like a lot yakuake for tabbed terminal. using konsole technologies, it add
> a pretty cool drop-down feature, which allow to have a term at any moment,
> just by typing F12.
The nice things about some of these more powerful window managers is
that it's pretty simple to write a bit of configura
> In fact, Kris Maglione is preparing a new wmii release and he has been
> spending a lot of effort in writing a new user guide. I've proof read
> it (see suckless ML, and wmii source repo) and it's looking good.
> "Not developed any longer" is just plain nonsense.
Yep, sorry, I've been misinform
2009/6/11 Cá Vàng :
> Hello everyone!
>
> As linux 2.6.30 is out, I decided to migrate my data partition to
> ext4. Hoping for better performance and less fragmentation.
>
> But, after format it with "mkfs.ext4 - largefile /dev/..." and copy
> all the file back to the partition, I got whooping numb
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:48 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> This is
> not often the case in glibc, but there's many more problems with C++
> programs and the standard C++ libs.
Usually glibc and libstdc++ are backwards compatible. ABI doesn't change
so programs compiled against older versions wil
Hello everyone!
As linux 2.6.30 is out, I decided to migrate my data partition to
ext4. Hoping for better performance and less fragmentation.
But, after format it with "mkfs.ext4 - largefile /dev/..." and copy
all the file back to the partition, I got whooping number of 30%
non-contiguous files!
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi schrieb:
Baho Utot wrote:
Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newer
glibc-2.10.1-2 on a system with an older glibc-2.9-7?
Yes and no. Depending if the executable or library that is linked to
glibc uses a symbol with declaring what version us
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:00 +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> ==> Finished making: vorbis-tools 1.2.0-3 i686 (Thu Jun 11 10:56:54 CEST 2009)
>
> Did you remove srcdir?
> autoconf 2.63-1
> > build()
> > {
> > cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
> > autoconf
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr --withou
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:54 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 04:53 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 22:05 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:45, Baho Utot wrote:
> > > > Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newe
==> Finished making: vorbis-tools 1.2.0-3 i686 (Thu Jun 11 10:56:54 CEST 2009)
Did you remove srcdir?
autoconf 2.63-1
On 11/06/2009, Baho Utot wrote:
> vorbis-tools gives me the following error
>
> -> bsdtar -x -f vorbis-tools-1.2.0.tar.gz
> ==> Entering fakeroot environment...
> ==> Starting
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 04:53 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 22:05 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:45, Baho Utot wrote:
> > > Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newer
> > > glibc-2.10.1-2 on a system with an older glibc-2.9-7?
>
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 22:05 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 19:45, Baho Utot wrote:
> > Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newer
> > glibc-2.10.1-2 on a system with an older glibc-2.9-7?
> >
> > According to LFS they say if you chnage glibc you sho
vorbis-tools gives me the following error
-> bsdtar -x -f vorbis-tools-1.2.0.tar.gz
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting build()...
aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61.
You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that,
you should regenerate
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:49 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Does it create complications if I install packages built with a newer
> > glibc-2.10.1-2 on a system with an older glibc-2.9-7?
> >
> Yes and no. Depending if the executable or library that is linked to
> gli
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:46:55 +0100
Damian wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:02:39 -0400
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I think the big thing about using a tiling window manager is
> > that it works best if you have a lot of terminals -- though
> > reasonable ones (Awesome included) have a floa
2009/6/10 David Rosenstrauch
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I think the big thing about using a tiling window manager is
>> that it works best if you have a lot of terminals
>>
>
> If you have a lot of terminals, a tabbed or split-screen terminal app, like
> Konsole or Terminator is probably mo
30 matches
Mail list logo
