Baho Utot wrote:
> I am gathering info on this new system
>
> I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
>
> Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
> AMD Phenom II X4 810 AM3 socket 2.6G
> 8GB High performance DDR3 ram
> Radeon HD 4670
>
> Will arch 64 install and run
You'd probably be able to run even windows on that monster thing. As far as
I'm concerned, the ATI drivers are now almost as good as the nvidia ones.
On 15/06/09 19:52 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
I am gathering info on this new system
I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 02:57 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> > I am gathering info on this new system
>> >
>> > I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
>> >
>
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 02:57 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > I am gathering info on this new system
> >
> > I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
> >
> > Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
> > AMD Phenom II
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> I am gathering info on this new system
>
> I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
>
> Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
> AMD Phenom II X4 810 AM3 socket 2.6G
> 8GB High performance DDR3 ram
> Radeon HD 4670
>
>
I am gathering info on this new system
I just bought a new computer ($550USD complete) as I wanted to go 64 bit
Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P motherboard
AMD Phenom II X4 810 AM3 socket 2.6G
8GB High performance DDR3 ram
Radeon HD 4670
Will arch 64 install and run on this?
With little trouble? :)
I a
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:20 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> Baho Utot wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Baho Utot wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I
Chris Bannister schrieb:
This makes no sense. Why would you unload a driver on shutdown? There is no
reason to do this.
What do you mean? OSS removes itself from modules during the daemon shutdown.
Maybe it does, but it makes no sense to do it. It only causes trouble
(as you are describing
2009/6/15 Thomas Bächler :
> Chris Bannister schrieb:
>>
>> If my soundcard is in use when I shutdown (which it normally is with
>> MPD because I just sudo halt and expect linux to shutdown), this
>> causes OSS to fail to unload, which in turn can leave my /var
>> partition mounted. Is there a spec
Chris Bannister schrieb:
If my soundcard is in use when I shutdown (which it normally is with
MPD because I just sudo halt and expect linux to shutdown), this
causes OSS to fail to unload, which in turn can leave my /var
partition mounted. Is there a specific reason it is done this way?
This ma
2009/6/15 Aaron Griffin :
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> If my soundcard is in use when I shutdown (which it normally is with
>> MPD because I just sudo halt and expect linux to shutdown), this
>> causes OSS to fail to unload, which in turn can leave my /var
>> partiti
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> If my soundcard is in use when I shutdown (which it normally is with
> MPD because I just sudo halt and expect linux to shutdown), this
> causes OSS to fail to unload, which in turn can leave my /var
> partition mounted. Is there a specific
If my soundcard is in use when I shutdown (which it normally is with
MPD because I just sudo halt and expect linux to shutdown), this
causes OSS to fail to unload, which in turn can leave my /var
partition mounted. Is there a specific reason it is done this way?
Am Montag 15 Juni 2009 schrieb Eric Bélanger:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > in order to provide a state of the art portmapper with ipv6 support and
> > all nfs4 stuff, we should replace portmap with rpcbind in [core].
> >
> > Simply replace portmap dae
Hi guys,
Based on nfs-utils from AUR we could support nfs4 rather easily.
Major changes:
- daemon scripts changed, nfslock and nfsd are dropped
- nfs-common and nfs-server are introduced, both have their config files on
/etc/conf.d
nfs-common is intended to run on nfs clients + server
nfs
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> in order to provide a state of the art portmapper with ipv6 support and all
> nfs4 stuff, we should replace portmap with rpcbind in [core].
>
> Simply replace portmap daemon with rpcbind in /etc/rc.conf
>
> please signoff both p
Hi guys,
in order to provide a state of the art portmapper with ipv6 support and all
nfs4 stuff, we should replace portmap with rpcbind in [core].
Simply replace portmap daemon with rpcbind in /etc/rc.conf
please signoff both packages
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & P
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> >
>> >> Baho Utot wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I have setup a new computer with a clean install with
>> >>> kernel26-2.6
Hi guys,
kernel26-2.6.30-4
please signoff, both arches.
Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Arch Linux bugfixes:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15067
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14879
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14485
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14958
http://bugs.arch
Thanks for the explanation/clarification. Keep up the good work!
- Original Message
From: David C. Rankin
To: General Discusson about Arch Linux
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:48:47 AM
Subject: Re: [arch-general] dmraid disk failure - howto rebuild new disk -
gparted hates Me :-(
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:54, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> kernel26-2.6.30-3
> please signoff, both arches.
> - removed dsdt patch, it doesn't work anymore, probably we can remove it
> forever. Please shout out loud, if you really need this!
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15112
--
Ro
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:07 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Baho Utot schrieb:
> > I can do thatif you can stand all the bug reports :)
> >
> > My script just finished and it found another 400+ that didn't build,
> > that will take some time to go through to find the ones that didn't
> > build
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 11:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:46 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >
> >> Baho Utot wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have setup a new computer with a clean install with
> >>> kernel26-2.6.29.4-1 does this kernel support unionfs?
> >>> Thi
Roman Kyrylych schrieb:
Packages that are already built don't really need immediate fixing
unless you build all your packages from source.
There are always some packages that cannot be built with current
gcc/glibc/kernel/other-deps,
but they work because they were built already some time ago.
Whe
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:07 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Baho Utot schrieb:
> > I can do thatif you can stand all the bug reports :)
> >
> > My script just finished and it found another 400+ that didn't build,
> > that will take some time to go through to find the ones that didn't
> > build
Baho Utot schrieb:
I can do thatif you can stand all the bug reports :)
My script just finished and it found another 400+ that didn't build,
that will take some time to go through to find the ones that didn't
build because of gcc-4.4.0 errors :)
You could collect them in one bugreport inst
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 04:14, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:45 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Baho Utot wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:51 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 18:46 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> I have encountered many packages
27 matches
Mail list logo
