Re: [arch-general] New Page added to wiki - Add_New_Partitions_To_Existing_System

2009-07-02 Thread Armando M. Baratti
David C. Rankin wrote: Listmates, After running out of room on my / partition on my Archlinux install and recovering by adding a couple of additional partitions, I put together a little howto in the wiki concerning the process in case anyone else finds themselves in the same situation

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-02 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Thomas Bächler wrote: > Allan McRae schrieb: For example: http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/out/i686/core.badfhs.txt >>> >>> Where does that come from? It's not in any package I know of. >>> >> >> rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so > > That is stupid. ppp plugins are su

Re: [arch-general] firefox 3.5 no preferences

2009-07-02 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Mike Shade wrote: > Caleb - I had this issue when I upgraded and the old binary was still > running in the background.  Close all instances, check ps output, and fire > it back up again.  Otherwise, try moving .mozilla to .mozilla-bak to > troubleshoot. yeah wasn't

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Damjan Georgievski schrieb: Now, rp-pppoe's /etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so and ppp-2.4.4's /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.4/rp-pppoe.so are doing the same thing, only the rp-pppoe version should be a bit newer and better. I dont have a clear overview of what the differences are (the ppp one is an older fork of

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages

2009-07-02 Thread Damjan Georgievski
>>> rp-pppoe-3.10-1/files:etc/ppp/plugins/rp-pppoe.so >> >> That is stupid. ppp plugins are supposed to be in /usr/lib/pppd/$VERSION and >> the ppp package already contains the rp-pppoe plugin. Why does rp-pppoe >> install it again? Why do we even need rp-pppoe? > > Good question - does anyone actu

Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Damien Churchill
2009/7/2 Thomas Bächler : > Damien Churchill schrieb: >> >> I've noticed an issue regarding mkinitcpio and the new modprobe changes >> that >> requires a symlink from /etc/modprobe.conf to >> /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf >> in order for options for any modules you load in the initramfs to be >> ap

Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Damien Churchill schrieb: I've noticed an issue regarding mkinitcpio and the new modprobe changes that requires a symlink from /etc/modprobe.conf to /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf in order for options for any modules you load in the initramfs to be applied, just incase this hasn't been reported ye

Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Damien Churchill
2009/7/2 Thomas Bächler : > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> >> I think you're mistaken. Our modprobe doesn't have any message of the >> sort, relating to Arch. The error you are seeing is due to a change in >> the way modprobe parses config files. It used to read >> /etc/modprobe.conf and/or /etc/modprob

Re: [arch-general] modprobe changes

2009-07-02 Thread Thomas Bächler
Aaron Griffin schrieb: I think you're mistaken. Our modprobe doesn't have any message of the sort, relating to Arch. The error you are seeing is due to a change in the way modprobe parses config files. It used to read /etc/modprobe.conf and/or /etc/modprobe.d/* - now it only reads /etc/modprobe.d

Re: [arch-general] 2 annoying bugs in kde

2009-07-02 Thread Edgar Kalkowski
Hi! Thank you for your responses! I tried a new user account with a fresh .kde4 configuration and the two things seem to work there. So I think I’ll have to delete .kde4 for my main account, too, but I’ll wait until I have a free weekend or so to copy all the things I need over to the new confi