Hi :)
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:43:58 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Rafa Griman schrieb:
> > I'm also having issues with my intel gfx card on 3 laptops (Dell Latitude
> > D610, MSI Wind and Acer ONE netbooks). When you hit Ctrl+Alt+F1 you get a
> > VT but when you hit Alt+F7 you don't get the X (KDE 4
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
bardo wrote:
makechrootpkg launches sudo only once, at line 202, and this is the
full command:
sudo -u nobody makepkg $MAKEPKG_ARGS || touch BUILD_FAILED
I do this all the time. I run the 64 bit kernel on
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> bardo wrote:
>>
>> makechrootpkg launches sudo only once, at line 202, and this is the
>> full command:
>> sudo -u nobody makepkg $MAKEPKG_ARGS || touch BUILD_FAILED
>>
>
> I do this all the time. I run the 64 bit kernel on a 32 bit userland an
bardo wrote:
makechrootpkg launches sudo only once, at line 202, and this is the
full command:
sudo -u nobody makepkg $MAKEPKG_ARGS || touch BUILD_FAILED
I do this all the time. I run the 64 bit kernel on a 32 bit userland
and have chroots to build for both architectures. It takes a bit o
On Thu-2009/07/09-19:17 Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> for arch in ${ARCHES}; do
>for repo in ${REPOS}; do
>echo -e -n "$arch-$repo:\t"
>date +"%x %X" -u -d @$(wget -q -O - $1/$repo/os/$arch/lastsync)
>done
> done
please don't post anything like this: apart from being barely
com
Gerhard Brauer schrieb:
Hi,
since 3-4 days i notice on mirrorchecking that for community repos the
status file for indicate the last sync of the mirror switch temporary on
some mirrors between actual(synced) and a out-of-sync period from ~16
days.
It seems that only mirrors are affected which sny
Hi,
since 3-4 days i notice on mirrorchecking that for community repos the
status file for indicate the last sync of the mirror switch temporary on
some mirrors between actual(synced) and a out-of-sync period from ~16
days.
It seems that only mirrors are affected which snyc more than once a day
and
That seemed to do the trick. Thanks a bunch!
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Gerardo Exequiel
Pozzi wrote:
> sergeantsp...@archlinux.us wrote:
>> When I started my Arch laptop today after applying updates last night,
>> I noticed that the XFCE menu button was not there. After further
>> investiga
On Tue 14 Jul 2009 15:34 -0400, sergeantsp...@archlinux.us wrote:
> When I started my Arch laptop today after applying updates last night, I
> noticed that the XFCE menu button was not there. After further investigation,
> I found this in /var/log/slim.log:
>
> /usr/lib/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4
sergeantsp...@archlinux.us wrote:
> When I started my Arch laptop today after applying updates last night,
> I noticed that the XFCE menu button was not there. After further
> investigation, I found this in /var/log/slim.log:
>
> /usr/lib/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-menu-plugin: error while loading
>
When I started my Arch laptop today after applying updates last night, I
noticed that the XFCE menu button was not there. After further investigation, I
found this in /var/log/slim.log:
/usr/lib/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-menu-plugin: error while loading shared
libraries: libjpeg.so.62: cannot
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> BTW and FYI, before I only referred to the arch-dev-public ML.
> So, here you can reply whenever you want.
Yes, I got that. Indeed, I made the wrong references. Thanks.
--
---
Denis A. Altoe Falque
2009/7/14, Thomas Bächler :
> Yes please, do so whenever you can. Generally, you can reply to any thread
> on arch-dev-public as long as you send the reply to arch-general and
> personally, I appreciate such input.
BTW and FYI, before I only referred to the arch-dev-public ML.
So, here you can re
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Yes please, do so whenever you can. Generally, you can reply to any thread
> on arch-dev-public as long as you send the reply to arch-general and
> personally, I appreciate such input.
Oh, thank you for the clarification. I always wanted to
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:43:58 Thomas Bächler wrote:
Solve it by editing
/usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc and adding TerminateServer=true to a
[X-*-Core] section, then restart kdm.
Maybe we should add this by default?
Yes, I would strongly advise it.
signature.asc
De
Denis A. Altoé Falqueto schrieb:
Hi all.
I would like to know how can we, common and lay users, give signoffs
on the packages that we use in testing. I know that arch-public-dev is
read only for non developpers and I would like to help too. Can we
send the signoffs in this list?
Yes please, do
bardo schrieb:
I've got some packages to upgrade for both arches and I was wondering
if it's possible to run a non-native chroot and stop resorting to
virtual machines. Given that i686 binaries should be runnable on an
x86_64 guest, i just used mkarchroot with an i686-configured
pacman.conf, but
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> No, you can't.
> Only developers can send signoffs in that list.
Yes, I knew that for arch-dev-public, but can I send signoffs here at
arch-general? I've heard sometime that a user's signoff would weight
half of a dev signoff, but I don't
2009/7/14, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto :
> Hi all.
>
> I would like to know how can we, common and lay users, give signoffs
> on the packages that we use in testing. I know that arch-public-dev is
> read only for non developpers and I would like to help too. Can we
> send the signoffs in this list?
Hi all.
I would like to know how can we, common and lay users, give signoffs
on the packages that we use in testing. I know that arch-public-dev is
read only for non developpers and I would like to help too. Can we
send the signoffs in this list?
Thanks in advance.
--
--
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:43:58 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Solve it by editing
> /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc and adding TerminateServer=true to a
> [X-*-Core] section, then restart kdm.
Maybe we should add this by default?
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
I've got some packages to upgrade for both arches and I was wondering
if it's possible to run a non-native chroot and stop resorting to
virtual machines. Given that i686 binaries should be runnable on an
x86_64 guest, i just used mkarchroot with an i686-configured
pacman.conf, but I get a sudo erro
Rafa Griman schrieb:
I'm also having issues with my intel gfx card on 3 laptops (Dell Latitude
D610, MSI Wind and Acer ONE netbooks). When you hit Ctrl+Alt+F1 you get a VT
but when you hit Alt+F7 you don't get the X (KDE 4.2 stable in my case)
session back. This happens on all 3 laptops with In
2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
> 2009/7/14 bardo
>> Firefox "a simple webbrowser"? You're joking, I hope...
>
> I was pointing at the discussion some years ago between MS and the EC that
> Internet Explorer could not be removed from the operating system :)
I didn't get this one, sorry =)
> I als
2009/7/14 bardo
> Firefox "a simple webbrowser"? You're joking, I hope...
I was pointing at the discussion some years ago between MS and the EC that
Internet Explorer could not be removed from the operating system :)
I also didn't want to come here just to whine my system has to be fixed
becau
bardo schrieb:
2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
I had the same problem after installing firefox without updating the whole
system. Only core, extra, community in use - no testing...
Your mirror probably synced while the move was in progress, this is
called bad luck ;) Anyway, selective upgrades
2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
> Again, I know I have to keep my Archlinux-systems up to date, but I didn't
> have the time to completely update that particular pc, still wanting to
> update firefox since my grandfather *only* uses firefox on his computer. I
> just didn't know pacman didn't handle
2009/7/14 Allan McRae
> bardo wrote:
>
>> 2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
>>
>>
>>> I had the same problem after installing firefox without updating the
>>> whole
>>> system. Only core, extra, community in use - no testing...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your mirror probably synced while the move was in progress
On Wed-2009/06/24-00:02 Loui Chang wrote:
> I'm going to try to take time to think up and work out a prototype for
> a robust system that will run the next generation of AUR. Right now
> I have some measly shell script to help me flesh out my ideas hah.
Whatever you do, please don't loose that JS
bardo wrote:
2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
I had the same problem after installing firefox without updating the whole
system. Only core, extra, community in use - no testing...
Your mirror probably synced while the move was in progress, this is
called bad luck ;) Anyway, selective upg
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 10:23:59 Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> Don't our scripts handle this by doing atomic moves?
There is nothing atomic about it. Even for a single package its not; we
recently had the problem with a broken community db file which was truncated.
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://users.
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:18:47 +0200
bardo wrote:
> 2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
> > I had the same problem after installing firefox without updating
> > the whole system. Only core, extra, community in use - no testing...
>
> Your mirror probably synced while the move was in progress, this is
>
2009/7/14 Vincent Van Houtte :
> I had the same problem after installing firefox without updating the whole
> system. Only core, extra, community in use - no testing...
Your mirror probably synced while the move was in progress, this is
called bad luck ;) Anyway, selective upgrades are known to br
Hi :)
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:43:24 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> Here is a rather strange one. On a dell gx280 box (Intel graphics) that
> had been running both kdemod3 and kde4.3 beta 2 just brilliantly, I am now
> left without any way to log in from the console. All was great
Hi,
2009/7/13 David Rosenstrauch
> I.e., sounds like you've got some compatibility issues with packages in
> testing.
I had the same problem after installing firefox without updating the whole
system. Only core, extra, community in use - no testing...
This looks like a bug to me. It might not
Listmates,
Here is a rather strange one. On a dell gx280 box (Intel graphics) that
had been running both kdemod3 and kde4.3 beta 2 just brilliantly, I am now left
without any way to log in from the console. All was great until updates earlier
today.
What happens is -- the box b
36 matches
Mail list logo
