Re: [arch-general] How do I re-create a DVD from the backup created by vobcopy? [SOLVED]

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 25 July 2009 08:50:53 pm David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > UUGH! The BUP file is a backup of the IFO file on a DVD, which contains the information about the organization of tracks, menus, chapters, subtitles on the disc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BUP -- Da

Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 25 July 2009 08:33:01 pm Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David C. > > Rankin wrote: > >> Listmates, > >> > >>Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and can't > >> find a file that co

Re: [arch-general] Error starting vim after updates (maybe there for a while)

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 25 July 2009 10:48:05 am Patrick Brisbin wrote: > this could probably be fixed the same way as the other vim problems > > sudo ln -s /usr/share/vim/vim72/ /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent > > pat > > On 07/25/09 at 01:27am, David C. Rankin wrote: > > Listmates, > > > > The latest men

Re: [arch-general] PCI modems

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On Thursday 23 July 2009 09:00:20 am Sergey Manucharian wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:50:19 +0200 > RedShift wrote: > > ... > > I don't think using second hand modems is a good idea, I really need > > something I can buy in a store... > > ... > > http://www.wiredparadise.net/46xvp.html > Amazi

[arch-general] What? - NO 'p' in dmraid-1.0.0.rc15-8 anymore?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, After going through the testing process with dmraid-1.0.0.rc15 where the biggest change for users was the addition of the 'p' in the /dev/mapper/raidname_device_partx naming convention, the last update warns that you must now *remove* the 'p' from fstab, etc.. What's

Re: [arch-general] No updates in past week or so - my update problem or just no updates?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On Thursday 23 July 2009 10:26:14 am David Rosenstrauch wrote: > David Rosenstrauch wrote: > > David C. Rankin wrote: > >> Listmates, > >> > >> I have several boxes running arch. In the past week or so, I haven't > >> had any updates. Is it my system not updating or have there been > >> relatively

Re: [arch-general] archboot stills depends of portmap

2009-07-25 Thread Allan McRae
mathieu p wrote: Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by rpcbind some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] ) This is a known issue: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15420 Allan

[arch-general] How do I re-create a DVD from the backup created by vobcopy?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, How do I re-create a DVD from the backup created by vobcopy? I have searched and I have read howto after howto and I still am stuck. Between ffmpeg this, dvdauthor that, qdvdauthor this to, I'm confused. I have written a script to properly prepare the VIDEO_TS and AUDIO_TS d

Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David C. > Rankin wrote: >> Listmates, >> >>        Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and can't >> find a file that contains the boot history showing all the "fail" messages >> during boot.

[arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out, what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread Keith
David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and can't find a file that contains the boot history showing all the "fail" messages during boot. I rarely find 'fail' type boot messages in any of the logs. When this happens to me, I use the follo

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Baho Utot wrote: >> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:48 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:03, Baho Utot wrote: >>> > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or >>>

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:48 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:03, Baho Utot wrote: >> > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or >> > the binaries. >> > >> > I need this for an older system (d

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Baho Utot schrieb: The current version just have too many dependencies to be able to use them. The older one only needs libtar,fakeroot and libdownload. THe new one requires somewhere around 10. But those pacman versions suck, seriously, they have so many annoying bugs that have been fixed i

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Baho Utot
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:48 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:03, Baho Utot wrote: > > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or > > the binaries. > > > > I need this for an older system (distro) > > > > Is it still available? > > > > Thanks > >

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Baho Utot
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 21:14 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 20:48, Baho Utot wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:13 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Baho Utot schrieb: > >> > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or > >> > the binaries. > >> >

Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Randy Morris wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 05:29:31PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David C. >> Rankin wrote: >> > Listmates, >> > >> >        Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and >> > can't find a file that c

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] readline-6.0.003-1

2009-07-25 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > ln -s ../../lib/libreadline.so /usr/lib/libreadline.so > > shared libs that are on /lib and also provides a static version in > /usr/lib must have a symlink in /usr/lib/ that points to shared lib in /lib > > I just checked if all others packages in repos that inst

Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread Randy Morris
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 05:29:31PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David C. > Rankin wrote: > > Listmates, > > > >        Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and > > can't find a file that contains the boot history showing all the > > "fail" messages

Re: [arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread Dan McGee
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > >        Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and can't > find a file that contains the boot history showing all the "fail" messages > during boot. For some reason after the latest update, my i686 box showe

[arch-general] archboot stills depends of portmap

2009-07-25 Thread mathieu p
Maybe someone should fix that, since portmap has been replaced by rpcbind some time ago (and portmap can no longer be found on any repo). (archboot is in [extra] )

[arch-general] Where can I find the "boot" log to find out what failed on boot?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, Seems like a simple question, but I've searched /var/log and can't find a file that contains the boot history showing all the "fail" messages during boot. For some reason after the latest update, my i686 box showed a half dozen or so "fail" messages. I need to find the log of

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] readline-6.0.003-1

2009-07-25 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Andreas Radke wrote: > Am Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:08:35 +1000 > schrieb Allan McRae : > > >> Bump upstream patch level, moved static libraries to /usr/lib >> >> Signoff both arches. >> >> Allan >> >> > > I now it's a bit too late but this minor update breaks lft compile > process that worked wi

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Daniel J Griffiths
Daenyth Blank wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:03, Baho Utot wrote: I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or the binaries. I need this for an older system (distro) Is it still available? Thanks Out of curiosity, why do you need the old copies? O

Re: [arch-general] What happened to konq-plugins-4.2.95svn985376-1?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
On Saturday 25 July 2009 12:17:15 pm Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Samstag 25 Juli 2009 18:38:32 schrieb David C. Rankin: > > What happened to konq-plugins-4.2.95svn985376-1? > > I removed it; use the one from the repo. > > Whew -- At least I know it wasn't me ;-) Thanks -- David C. Ran

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 13:03, Baho Utot wrote: > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or > the binaries. > > I need this for an older system (distro) > > Is it still available? > > Thanks > > Out of curiosity, why do you need the old copies?

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 20:48, Baho Utot wrote: > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:13 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Baho Utot schrieb: >> > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or >> > the binaries. >> > >> > I need this for an older system (distro) >> > >> > Is it still a

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Baho Utot
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 19:13 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Baho Utot schrieb: > > I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or > > the binaries. > > > > I need this for an older system (distro) > > > > Is it still available? > > ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/pacman/ >

Re: [arch-general] What happened to konq-plugins-4.2.95svn985376-1?

2009-07-25 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Samstag 25 Juli 2009 18:38:32 schrieb David C. Rankin: > What happened to konq-plugins-4.2.95svn985376-1? I removed it; use the one from the repo. -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

Re: [arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Baho Utot schrieb: I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or the binaries. I need this for an older system (distro) Is it still available? ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/pacman/ PKGBUILDs are probably in our old CVS, but it seems the cvs-arch tree (which was whe

[arch-general] Pacman version 2.98 or pacman 3.0

2009-07-25 Thread Baho Utot
I need pacman 2.98 or 3.0 and the dependencies, either the PKGBUILDS or the binaries. I need this for an older system (distro) Is it still available? Thanks

[arch-general] What happened to konq-plugins-4.2.95svn985376-1?

2009-07-25 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, I have another newer package according to the last updates: :: Starting full system upgrade... warning: konq-plugins: local (4.2.95svn985376-1) is newer than kde-unstable (4.2.4-2) kde-unstable is before testing in pacman.conf. I've looked and I can't find any packag

Re: [arch-general] Error starting vim after updates (maybe there for a while)

2009-07-25 Thread Patrick Brisbin
this could probably be fixed the same way as the other vim problems sudo ln -s /usr/share/vim/vim72/ /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent pat On 07/25/09 at 01:27am, David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > > The latest menu error was received starting vim by clicking on an > attachment in kmail: >

Re: [arch-general] [OT] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kbd-1.15-2

2009-07-25 Thread Roman Kyrylych
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 22:28, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:01:15 +0300 > Roman Kyrylych wrote: > > >> a sign == знак >> a signature == підпис >> to sign == підписувати >> that's why translation was incorrect >> sign off is even harder :-P >> (as there's no word-to-word trans

[arch-general] [signoff] openvpn 2.1_rc19-2

2009-07-25 Thread Thomas Bächler
Tested on x86_64, please sign off. Fixes: - Upstream URL was wrong: http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/openvpn/trunk/PKGBUILD?r1=47204&r2=47207 - Display of right configuration files on /etc/rc.d/openvpn stop: http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/openvpn/trunk/openvpn.rc?r1=47204&r2=47594 -