Re: [arch-general] Relating to missing lzma manuals.

2009-08-06 Thread ludovic coues
lzma format and tools ahve never reach the stable stage. There are stuck as beta, and have been replaced by .xz format. from http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-file-format.txt: "It is intended that this this format replace the old .lzma format used by LZMA SDK and LZMA Utils." So its probably an upstream

Re: [arch-general] Firefox Fullscreen Fix

2009-08-06 Thread Manne Merak
Andrei Thorp wrote: Hello, With the latest Firefox (3.5) with closed Nvidia drivers providing libGL, Firefox (or something) segfaults whenever you try to fullscreen a flash video (try youtube). Searching around, I've found a fix: simply export this in your environment: export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/li

Re: [arch-general] Firefox Fullscreen Fix

2009-08-06 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
> export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 that fix was working for me since i upgraded to firefox 3.5 but since the update of nvidia driver recently and firefox update too. this fix does not work ANYMORE. look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496831 and other duplicated bug reports

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Gerardo Exequiel > Pozzi wrote: >> Eric Bélanger wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Griffin >>> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6,

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Eric Bélanger wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Eric Bélanger >>> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Hi, >>

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel >>> Pozzi wrote: >>> Hi, There are some lost packages in testing/os/any/ in the

Re: [arch-general] Firefox Fullscreen Fix

2009-08-06 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 07.08.2009 03:33, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote: > +1 for bug report > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > > >> Hello, >> >> With the latest Firefox (3.5) with closed Nvidia drivers providing >> libGL, Firefox (or something) segfaults whenever you try to fullscreen >> a fl

Re: [arch-general] Firefox Fullscreen Fix

2009-08-06 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Hello, > > With the latest Firefox (3.5) with closed Nvidia drivers providing > libGL, Firefox (or something) segfaults whenever you try to fullscreen > a flash video (try youtube). > > Searching around, I've found a fix: simply export this in y

Re: [arch-general] Firefox Fullscreen Fix

2009-08-06 Thread Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
+1 for bug report On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Hello, > > With the latest Firefox (3.5) with closed Nvidia drivers providing > libGL, Firefox (or something) segfaults whenever you try to fullscreen > a flash video (try youtube). > > Searching around, I've found a fix: si

[arch-general] Firefox Fullscreen Fix

2009-08-06 Thread Andrei Thorp
Hello, With the latest Firefox (3.5) with closed Nvidia drivers providing libGL, Firefox (or something) segfaults whenever you try to fullscreen a flash video (try youtube). Searching around, I've found a fix: simply export this in your environment: export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 You can

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel >> Pozzi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> There are some lost packages in testing/os/any/ in the FTP [#1] that are >>> already moved to extra/os/any.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel > Pozzi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There are some lost packages in testing/os/any/ in the FTP [#1] that are >> already moved to extra/os/any. >> >> imagemagick-doc-6.5.4.5-1-any.pkg.tar.gz >> kde-l10n-a

Re: [arch-general] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Hi, > > There are some lost packages in testing/os/any/ in the FTP [#1] that are > already moved to extra/os/any. > > imagemagick-doc-6.5.4.5-1-any.pkg.tar.gz > kde-l10n-ar-4.3.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz > ... > kde-l10n-zh_tw-4.3.0-1-any.pkg.

[arch-general] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP

2009-08-06 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Hi, There are some lost packages in testing/os/any/ in the FTP [#1] that are already moved to extra/os/any. imagemagick-doc-6.5.4.5-1-any.pkg.tar.gz kde-l10n-ar-4.3.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz ... kde-l10n-zh_tw-4.3.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz kde-meta-kdeaccessibility-4.3-3-any.pkg.tar.gz ... kde-meta-kdewebdev-4

Re: [arch-general] ABI compliance checker

2009-08-06 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: > Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System > Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free > lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of > shared C/C++ libraries in OS Linux. It checks interface sig

Re: [arch-general] GStreamer packages

2009-08-06 Thread Thijs Vermeir
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 18:06 +0200, Thijs Vermeir wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I see that some GStreamer packages have been outdated, attached you > > can find the PGKBUILD's with upgraded version and some other > > modifications deta

Re: [arch-general] GStreamer packages

2009-08-06 Thread Jan de Groot
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 18:06 +0200, Thijs Vermeir wrote: > Hello all, > > I see that some GStreamer packages have been outdated, attached you > can find the PGKBUILD's with upgraded version and some other > modifications detailed below. > > (Coudn't find if this is already discused) > I also had a

[arch-general] GStreamer packages

2009-08-06 Thread Thijs Vermeir
Hello all, I see that some GStreamer packages have been outdated, attached you can find the PGKBUILD's with upgraded version and some other modifications detailed below. (Coudn't find if this is already discused) I also had a question about the gst-plugins-base/good/bad/ugly packages. I see that

[arch-general] ABI compliance checker

2009-08-06 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of shared C/C++ libraries in OS Linux. It checks interface signatures and data type definitions

Re: [arch-general] autogen.sh now fails building radeonhd - m4_pattern_allow -- how? [SOLVED]

2009-08-06 Thread David C. Rankin
On Thursday 30 July 2009 11:45:15 am David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > > I have been working with the radeonhd folks for several months testing > the radeonhd driver. I have probably built the driver 50 times over that > period. In the past few days, something changed so I can no longe

Re: [arch-general] Archlinux added a choice for OS selection at bugs.kde.org

2009-08-06 Thread David C. Rankin
On Thursday 30 July 2009 01:52:39 pm Roman Kyrylych wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:48, David C. > Rankin wrote: > > Listmates, > > > >You should now be able to choose Archlinux as the OS when filing > > bugs at bugs.kde.org. > > The correct name is "Arch Linux", not "Archlinux". > >

Re: [arch-general] KDE4.3 upgrade

2009-08-06 Thread Michel Filipe
Or install the gstreamer0.10-good-plugins package. As Edgar says the phonon- xine solve your problems and it is better backend for phonon. On Thursday 06 August 2009 12:05:38 pm Edgar Kalkowski wrote: > As for the Amarok/MP3 thing: I had the same/a similar issue when upgrading > to KDE 4.3. It se

Re: [arch-general] KDE4.3 upgrade

2009-08-06 Thread Edgar Kalkowski
As for the Amarok/MP3 thing: I had the same/a similar issue when upgrading to KDE 4.3. It seems in 4.3 the default phonon backend is gstreamer which is known to have issues. Try installing phonon-xine from extra and selecting xine as backind in systemsettings/multimedia. This did the trick for m

Re: [arch-general] KDE4.3 upgrade

2009-08-06 Thread Fabian Schölzel
http://www.archlinux.org/news/455/

[arch-general] KDE4.3 upgrade

2009-08-06 Thread Manne Merak
Just upgraded to KDE4.3 and for some reason almost all possible KDE apps were installed alongside the upgraded packages? anyone know why? Also I lost the ability to play MP3s in Amarok. Manne

Re: [arch-general] In defense of pacman.static

2009-08-06 Thread David Rosenstrauch
On 08/06/2009 03:01 AM, Piyush P Kurur wrote: So I hit pacman -Syu on eeepc and it first asked to install the new pacman version. I went ahead and then with the new pacman I had a problem. It would just not run as a shared library was missing. I was stuck. One way was to reinstall the thing aga

Re: [arch-general] Relating to missing lzma manuals.

2009-08-06 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Frederic Bezies wrote: > lzma is now replaced by xz-utils. what does this have to do with the command not having it's manual page? where other lzma commands do? I suppose it could be missing from upstream, is that what the problem is? this is an upstream bug? -- Ca

Re: [arch-general] xzgv, rtorrent and libtorrent have been orphaned - where can I apply for maintainership ?

2009-08-06 Thread Allan McRae
Partha Chowdhury wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:58:17PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: Partha Chowdhury wrote: i have been using archlinux for about 3 months.I have switched from fedora to arch due to its simplicity. i had reported a bug http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15199?string=xzgv&pr

Re: [arch-general] xzgv, rtorrent and libtorrent have been orphaned - where can I apply for maintainership ?

2009-08-06 Thread Partha Chowdhury
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:58:17PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Partha Chowdhury wrote: > >i have been using archlinux for about 3 months.I have switched from > >fedora to arch due to its simplicity. > >i had reported a bug > >http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15199?string=xzgv&project=1&type[0]=&sev[0

Re: [arch-general] xzgv, rtorrent and libtorrent have been orphaned - where can I apply for maintainership ?

2009-08-06 Thread Allan McRae
Partha Chowdhury wrote: i have been using archlinux for about 3 months.I have switched from fedora to arch due to its simplicity. i had reported a bug http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15199?string=xzgv&project=1&type[0]=&sev[0]=&pri[0]=&due[0]=&reported[0]=&cat[0]=&status[0]=open&percent[0]=&opened

[arch-general] xzgv, rtorrent and libtorrent have been orphaned - where can I apply for maintainership ?

2009-08-06 Thread Partha Chowdhury
i have been using archlinux for about 3 months.I have switched from fedora to arch due to its simplicity. i had reported a bug http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15199?string=xzgv&project=1&type[0]=&sev[0]=&pri[0]=&due[0]=&reported[0]=&cat[0]=&status[0]=open&percent[0]=&opened=&dev=&closed=&duedatefrom

[arch-general] Relating to missing lzma manuals.

2009-08-06 Thread Frederic Bezies
Hello. I want to answer to Caleb Cushing who is talking about missing lzma manuals. lzma is now replaced by xz-utils. http://tukaani.org/xz/ Hope it helps ;) -- Frederic Bezies fredbez...@gmail.com

Re: [arch-general] [*] Re: In defense of pacman.static

2009-08-06 Thread Allan McRae
Piyush P Kurur wrote: On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:12:55PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: ludovic coues wrote: It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose. By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, i

Re: [arch-general] [*] Re: In defense of pacman.static

2009-08-06 Thread Piyush P Kurur
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:12:55PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > ludovic coues wrote: >> It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose. >> By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade >> itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame. >> >> I th

Re: [arch-general] In defense of pacman.static

2009-08-06 Thread Allan McRae
ludovic coues wrote: It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose. By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame. I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf Its not act

Re: [arch-general] In defense of pacman.static

2009-08-06 Thread ludovic coues
It's a problem with the default pacman.conf I suppose. By default, pacman is configured to upgrade itself first. If he have upgrade itself, but forget to bring dependencies with it, it's a shame. I think this is a bug with the FirstSync option in pacman.conf