On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 03:57:26PM +0200, Jan Spakula wrote:
> Excerpts from Christian Himpel's message of Mo Aug 31 15:32:48 +0200 2009:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 15:22, Jan Spakula wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
> > > It's possibly the issu
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:39:38PM +0200, Firmicus wrote:
> Jan Spakula a écrit :
> > Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
> >
> >> complaint was that they are not in the correct format. So I guess
> >> the following needs to be done.
> >>
> >> 1) Add libpopp
Jan Spakula a écrit :
> Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
>
>> complaint was that they are not in the correct format. So I guess
>> the following needs to be done.
>>
>> 1) Add libpoppler as a dependency to latex
>>
>
> you are right about this.
>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Mon 31 Aug 2009 21:20 +0400, joz...@gmx.com wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:08, wrote:
>> > > @ Loui Chang
>> > > What was wrong with my signature? :) Anyway thanks for suggestion. It's
On Mon 31 Aug 2009 21:20 +0400, joz...@gmx.com wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:08, wrote:
> > > @ Loui Chang
> > > What was wrong with my signature? :) Anyway thanks for suggestion. It's
> > > only
> > > 2 lines now :)
> > If your sig is longer
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:08, wrote:
> > @ Loui Chang
> > What was wrong with my signature? :) Anyway thanks for suggestion. It's only
> > 2 lines now :)
> If your sig is longer than your actual message...
Yeah, looks ugly.
By the way, I tried first
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:08, wrote:
> @ Loui Chang
> What was wrong with my signature? :) Anyway thanks for suggestion. It's only
> 2 lines now :)
If your sig is longer than your actual message...
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
> On 08/31/09 at 11:42am, Andre Ramaciotti da Silva wrote:
>
> > Also, wouldn't it be better if offlineimap ran every once in a while
> > instead of
> > only when you start KDE? In this case, setting up cron would be better
> > suited.
>
> i agree.
On Mon 31 Aug 2009 18:22 +0400, joz...@gmx.com wrote:
> I can't find out the way to start offlineimap automatically each time I
> start KDE. I tryed with ./kde4/Autostart and shell script but it didn't
> work.
> Is there any other way to run in autoamtiaclly in KDE or I must to
> always start it m
On 08/31/09 at 11:42am, Andre Ramaciotti da Silva wrote:
> Also, wouldn't it be better if offlineimap ran every once in a while instead
> of
> only when you start KDE? In this case, setting up cron would be better suited.
i agree.
offlineimap does have a builtin interval-resync functionality,
At Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:30:50 +0200,
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>
> On 31/08/2009, joz...@gmx.com wrote:
> > I can't find out the way to start offlineimap automatically each time I
> > start KDE. I tryed with ./kde4/Autostart and shell script but it didn't
> > work.
> > Is there any other way to run i
On 31/08/2009, joz...@gmx.com wrote:
> I can't find out the way to start offlineimap automatically each time I
> start KDE. I tryed with ./kde4/Autostart and shell script but it didn't
> work.
> Is there any other way to run in autoamtiaclly in KDE or I must to
> always start it manually?
Hi,
$ ln
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 15:57, Jan Spakula wrote:
> Excerpts from Christian Himpel's message of Mo Aug 31 15:32:48 +0200 2009:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 15:22, Jan Spakula wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
>> > It's possibly the issue that's come
I can't find out the way to start offlineimap automatically each time I
start KDE. I tryed with ./kde4/Autostart and shell script but it didn't
work.
Is there any other way to run in autoamtiaclly in KDE or I must to
always start it manually?
Thanks!
--
___
| |
Excerpts from Christian Himpel's message of Mo Aug 31 15:32:48 +0200 2009:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 15:22, Jan Spakula wrote:
> > Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
> > It's possibly the issue that's come up on the forums:
> > if you get something like:
> > --
Excerpts from Christian Himpel's message of Mo Aug 31 15:32:48 +0200 2009:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 15:22, Jan Spakula wrote:
> > Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
> > It's possibly the issue that's come up on the forums:
> > if you get something like:
> > --
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 15:22, Jan Spakula wrote:
> Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
> It's possibly the issue that's come up on the forums:
> if you get something like:
> ---
> This is TeX, Version
> Fatal format file error; I'm stymied
> ---
> then you
Excerpts from Piyush P Kurur's message of Mo Aug 31 14:48:03 +0200 2009:
> complaint was that they are not in the correct format. So I guess
> the following needs to be done.
>
> 1) Add libpoppler as a dependency to latex
you are right about this.
> 2) recompile libpoppler with latest gcc which
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Tom K schrieb:
SImplest, most Arch-like solution is to load the modules in the
required order in the rc.conf MODULES array.
I hope that's what you mean by "manually". :)
With the asynchronous "trigger && load MODULES=() && settle", there is
no way anymore to ensure mod
Hi,
latex which was fine till last update is having an unmet
libpoppler dependency. When I tried to install libpoppler then the
complaint was that they are not in the correct format. So I guess
the following needs to be done.
1) Add libpoppler as a dependency to latex
2) recompile libpop
At Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:07:36 +0300,
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:03, Tom K wrote:
> > SImplest, most Arch-like solution is to load the modules in the required
> > order in the rc.conf MODULES array.
>
> I believe this no longer works. MODULES are not processed in the orde
Am Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:24:19 +0200
schrieb Thomas Bächler :
> Tom K schrieb:
> > SImplest, most Arch-like solution is to load the modules in the
> > required order in the rc.conf MODULES array.
> >
> > I hope that's what you mean by "manually". :)
>
> With the asynchronous "trigger && load MODUL
David C. Rankin wrote:
OK,
Here are the arch screenshot comparisons. NOTE - All the fonts in the arch
kde control panel are set at "8pt" while the ones in the suse screenshots are
set at "9pt" and the arch fonts (moost notable in the kmail folder list) loop
larger than the same fonts in sus
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:47, David C.
Rankin wrote:
> Now with the driver static, I wonder if it might not be worth looking
> into to
> see if it is even feasable to try and make it work with the current arch
> setup.
There is still a problem with kernel.
As far as I remember fglrx was
Tom K schrieb:
SImplest, most Arch-like solution is to load the modules in the required
order in the rc.conf MODULES array.
I hope that's what you mean by "manually". :)
With the asynchronous "trigger && load MODULES=() && settle", there is
no way anymore to ensure module loading order! You
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:03, Tom K wrote:
> SImplest, most Arch-like solution is to load the modules in the required
> order in the rc.conf MODULES array.
I believe this no longer works. MODULES are not processed in the order now.
--
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
26 matches
Mail list logo
