Re: [arch-general] Entranced - Anybody Using It? I get it started, can enter name, but that's it.

2009-11-10 Thread Jeffrey Parke
David C. Rankin wrote: Guys I was trying to setup entranced on Arch. I followed the enlightenment.org wiki, but the arch setup for Xsession, etc. left me a little unsure on exactly where some of the entrance_edit path info should point. The Arch default for entrance_config.cfg is: Entrance

[arch-general] Entranced - Anybody Using It? I get it started, can enter name, but that's it.

2009-11-10 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys I was trying to setup entranced on Arch. I followed the enlightenment.org wiki, but the arch setup for Xsession, etc. left me a little unsure on exactly where some of the entrance_edit path info should point. The Arch default for entrance_config.cfg is: Entrance Daemon Settings attempts

Re: [arch-general] pacman & sudo

2009-11-10 Thread Alessandro Doro
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Xavier wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Alessandro Doro wrote: > > And times ago there where permission (umask) issues with users calling > > pacman with sudo. > > > > There is no problem calling pacman with sudo, I do that all the time. > > I t

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread fons
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:11:04PM -0500, Christopher Daley wrote: > I think the default way of starting pulse has become dependent on consolekit > & policykit ever since the pulse user was removed. If you (like me) don't like all this kiddy stuff, both are easy to disable. For Consolekit, just r

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Daley
Never mind about that package on AUR, I can't get it to build. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Daley wrote: > Have you tried running pulseaudio as a daemon? e.g. "/etc/rc.d/pulseaudio > start' > This would likely be a fix for now... > > OR > If you're feeling daring, then maybe try

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Daley
Have you tried running pulseaudio as a daemon? e.g. "/etc/rc.d/pulseaudio start' This would likely be a fix for now... OR If you're feeling daring, then maybe try out this udev-acl package I just put up on AUR. I have no idea if it will work, I just threw it together with the patch that was prov

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Christopher Daley wrote: > Also, make sure your user is a member of the group 'audio'? > > If you're still having problems then run > > ls -l /dev/snd > > and show us the output I'm having the same problem as OP. Re-configuring fails: % groups wheel audio users

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread Jan de Groot
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:36 +0100, A Rojas wrote: > I just updated to hal 0.5.13-3 and after rebooting the soundcard is not > accessible to non-root users anymore, so there is no sound. Any idea how to > solve this? > Thanks > Hal used to do ACL management, just like udev does. The new release

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Daley
Also, make sure your user is a member of the group 'audio'? If you're still having problems then run ls -l /dev/snd and show us the output On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Jozsef wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, A Rojas wrote: > > > I just updated to hal 0.5.13-3 and after rebooting the soundca

Re: [arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread Jozsef
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, A Rojas wrote: > I just updated to hal 0.5.13-3 and after rebooting the soundcard is not > accessible to non-root users anymore, so there is no sound. Any idea how to > solve this? > Thanks ALSA or OSS? If it is ALSA try to reconfigure it. That should work. -- Best, Joz

[arch-general] No sound after hal update

2009-11-10 Thread A Rojas
I just updated to hal 0.5.13-3 and after rebooting the soundcard is not accessible to non-root users anymore, so there is no sound. Any idea how to solve this? Thanks

[arch-general] pacman & sudo

2009-11-10 Thread Xavier
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Alessandro Doro wrote: > And not only for security reasons; If you have time have a look at > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14926 > in that case the permission problems affected the system directories. > > And times ago there where permission (umask) issues with u