On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 02:24 -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> > Oh no. It has been 1 day and my "bug" is not fixed! I must blog about it so
> > the world listens to me...
>
> also no one has presented a /good/ reason for not fixing it, only
> reasons they don't think it should be fixed. you could do
> Oh no. It has been 1 day and my "bug" is not fixed! I must blog about it so
> the world listens to me...
also no one has presented a /good/ reason for not fixing it, only
reasons they don't think it should be fixed. you could do abc or d
things that I can think of... but no one has said why sec
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 11:07:08 and regarding:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
>
> thanks
>
I've used about all of them from plain
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
>>
>> so here's the problem I've discovered
>>
>> http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com/2009/11/bypassing-disabled-accounts-with-kdm.html
>> < links to arch bug included posting here because I believe both kde's
>> and arch's
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 05:50:02 and regarding:
> Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
>
> You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except
> you have got the permission from Sun of course)
>
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 08:26:22 and regarding:
> cool stuff, bro
>
> We hope you enjoy using arch as much as we do.
>
Amen,
When I thought about trying Arch, I never envisioned replacing SuSE
with
Arch, but "never-say-never." Arch is just so much better thought out from the
tech
Caleb Cushing wrote:
so here's the problem I've discovered
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com/2009/11/bypassing-disabled-accounts-with-kdm.html
< links to arch bug included posting here because I believe both kde's
and arch's developers responses are less than satisfactory. This is a
security bug
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Antony Jepson wrote:
>> On 2009-11-17, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
>>> In gmail's web interface a thread is vertical, sorted by time. However
>>> here in mutt, I can see that I've replied to you in our own little
>>> thread branch.
>>
>>
so here's the problem I've discovered
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com/2009/11/bypassing-disabled-accounts-with-kdm.html
< links to arch bug included posting here because I believe both kde's
and arch's developers responses are less than satisfactory. This is a
security bug an easy to fix without
Alessandro Doro wrote:
Patch the Makefile (you don't need to run ./configure) then make.
--- Makefile2009-11-17 21:36:47.0 +0100
+++ ../Makefile 2009-11-17 21:36:03.0 +0100
@@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
hey that compiled. thanks. i didn't realize it has a makefile despite
failed confi
Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/17/2009 07:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
you could try thunderbird. thunderbird
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:11:16PM +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>
> >I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
> >mail reader. Might be worth looking into
> >
> >http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
>
> looks very promising. thanks for sharing. coul
On 11/17/2009 07:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
you could try thunderbird. thunderbird 3 which is now beta
Daenyth Blank wrote:
I just saw a link on reddit this morning for "notmuch", a sup-inspired
mail reader. Might be worth looking into
http://keithp.com/blogs/notmuch/
looks very promising. thanks for sharing. couldnt compile it, but maybe
someone less lazy them me can educate that dude that t
Antony Jepson wrote:
On 2009-11-17, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
In gmail's web interface a thread is vertical, sorted by time. However
here in mutt, I can see that I've replied to you in our own little
thread branch.
I definitely prefer the proper threading available in Mutt. I often find
myself na
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 20:23:25 Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Aha, so this is the same as the "threaded vs nested comments" when it
> comes to web page commenting. As far as I know, that's a holy war no
> one will ever win.
>
Well, in Kmail I can set it to keep my replies on the folder as well as t
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:46:15 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> claws is cool indeed. i like the ability to view html mail (for
> newsletters and such). i just hoped it was more configurable
> (e.g. per-account keybindings so i could have single-key keybindings
> to delete mails when i'm in my news
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:01:31 -0800
Myles Green wrote:
> I've been using Claws-Mail [1] since forever and have been happily
> using it with Gmail as well as my ISP account.
>
> [1] http://claws-mail.org/
claws is cool indeed. i like the ability to view html mail (for
newsletters and such). i j
On 2009-11-17, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
> In gmail's web interface a thread is vertical, sorted by time. However
> here in mutt, I can see that I've replied to you in our own little
> thread branch.
I definitely prefer the proper threading available in Mutt. I often find
myself navigating through my
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Patrick Brisbin wrote:
> On 11/17/09 at 01:13pm, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Marc Deop i Argemí
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
>> >> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
>> >
I thought he was talking about how gmail only has one level for
each conversation and some MUA have more
gmail keeps a list of mails and other ones create a tree of mails
branching at each reply that doesn't follow the data sequencing
or something like that...
--
Guilherme M. Nogueira
"Any suff
On 11/17/09 at 01:13pm, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Marc Deop i Argemí
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
> >> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
> >> interface, and in particular the way it handles threads
> >>
>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Marc Deop i Argemí
wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
>> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
>> interface, and in particular the way it handles threads
>>
>
> Would you mind to explain what is addicting you?
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:11:12 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Xavier wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Arvid Picciani
> > wrote:
> >> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> >> i've trie
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 19:06:18 Xavier wrote:
> Lately I realized I have become way too addicted of the gmail
> interface, and in particular the way it handles threads
>
Would you mind to explain what is addicting you?
I specially *dislike* the way gmail puts all the replies at the same le
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:07, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
>
> thanks
>
I just saw a link on reddit this morning
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Xavier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
>> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
>> unusable slow.
>>
>> Can somone recommend another M
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
>
Lately I realized I have become way too addicted
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:20:06 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it
is unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thank
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it
is unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
emacs/gnus
emacs/wanderlust
?
humm.. i didn't know emac
Arvid Picciani wrote:
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it
is unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
emacs/gnus
emacs/wanderlust
?
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 22:37:08 Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
> i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
> unusable slow.
>
> Can somone recommend another MUA?
kmail. Using for last 5+ years with no real com
Mutt grows old and still doesn't do threads the way i want.
i've tried sup, but find it too early in development. Especcially it is
unusable slow.
Can somone recommend another MUA?
thanks
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
No, it is not actually...
2009/11/17 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:57 -0600, Dwight Schauer wrote:
>> Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
>> away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.
>
> Honestly, is it THAT hard to compile it from the AUR?
>
>
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:57 -0600, Dwight Schauer wrote:
> Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
> away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.
Honestly, is it THAT hard to compile it from the AUR?
Cool artwork David.. Nicely done.
- Original Message
From: David C. Rankin
To: Arch Linux
Sent: Tue, November 17, 2009 2:25:25 AM
Subject: [arch-general] First install of gnome on Arch, pretty cool... (new
artwork this time :-)
Guys,
Looking at the new desktop, I just had to take a
cool stuff, bro
We hope you enjoy using arch as much as we do.
On 11/17/09, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Looking at the new desktop, I just had to take a screenshot and share. I
> never
> install gnome, but since I had enlightenment installed and a bunch of bits
> and
> pieces of gnome ins
Yeah, as soon as I saw this redistribution discussion updated right
away as I assumed it would soon be deleted.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:53 AM, tuxce wrote:
> 2009/11/17 Pierre Schmitz
>>
>> Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
>> > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the inf
2009/11/17 Pierre Schmitz
>
> Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
> >
>
> You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except you
> have got the permission from Sun of course)
>
> --
>
> Pierre Schmit
Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
>
You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except you
have got the permission from Sun of course)
--
Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
2009/11/17 David C. Rankin
> Guys,
>
> The archlinuxfr server has a bad virtualbox package on it. There is a lot
> of
> things virtualbox is, but one thing it isn't is an 8 meg package:
>
> :: Retrieving packages from archlinuxfr...
> error: failed retrieving file 'virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1-x86_64.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 02:47:31PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 13:28 +0100, viodreamlis...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I have got a quad core procesor but my archlinux only detect 1 cpu.
> > ---
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux Nemesis 2.6.31-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 23
42 matches
Mail list logo
