On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Xavier wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty
>>> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae
wrote:
>
> Thomas Bächler wrot
Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Xavier wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Allan McRae schrieb:
That works for me. I initially thought it was strange that it came
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM.
Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM
I have the same chipset. No issues.
Same chi
Jan de Groot schreef:
[...]
I always thought GNU was about one tool - one job, but then they
violated that by building emacs.
Actually, one tool for one job is a Unix statement and dates from (long)
before GNU:
(i) Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh
rather
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> Thomas Bächler wrote:
Allan McRae schrieb:
>
> That works for me. I initially thought it was strange that it came
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>>
>>> Allan McRae schrieb:
That works for me. I initially thought it was strange that it came on
but now I see why. extreme-tuxracer is giving
On 05.12.2009 17:39, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:30:10 +0100
> schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase :
>
>
>> You could try this one
>> (http://phraktured.net/archlinux-2009.12-netinstall-x86_64.iso) we are
>> currently preparing for the next release. It uses a newer kernel and
>> isolinux.
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:30 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:11 PM, toomanymirrors
> wrote:
> > Yes, no matter where you mount a raid partition to, you will necessarily
> > need the raid modules loaded. Accessing hardware requires drivers.
> > Jackson
>
> So in my rc.conf
Whats the plan re devtmpfs ?
2009/12/5 Roman Kyrylych :
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM.
>>
>> Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM
>
>
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 18:29, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> What's your chipset? Allan's chipset? No such issues here on 945GM.
>
> Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM
I have the same chipset. No issues.
--
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кир
Am Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:30:10 +0100
schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase :
> You could try this one
> (http://phraktured.net/archlinux-2009.12-netinstall-x86_64.iso) we are
> currently preparing for the next release. It uses a newer kernel and
> isolinux. Please tell us the results. That image I linked is
>
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Emmanuel Benisty schrieb:
>>>
>>> With KMS on, my screen flickers every 20sec or so. Tried with no
>>> xorg.conf
>>> and the same thing. I even got some sort of yellow/orange screen of
>>> death.
>>> I did not use KMS with 2.6.31 so this
Le Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:26:27 +0100,
Xavier a écrit :
> If I got that right, I find it quite funny and ironical that a
> clueless and endless ranting about dbus ended up making me understand
> the coolness of dbus.
I agree, it sounds cool, but then I thought: web browsers have been
doing that for
Emmanuel Benisty schrieb:
With KMS on, my screen flickers every 20sec or so. Tried with no xorg.conf
and the same thing. I even got some sort of yellow/orange screen of death.
I did not use KMS with 2.6.31 so this may not be kernel related. I'll look
into it later but disabling kms from the g
Le Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:34:59 +0100,
Jan de Groot a écrit :
> Please don't post things you haven't looked into. Hal has nothing to do
> with your gfx driver, as gfx drivers are probed by xorg itself using the
> libpciaccess library. The only things managed by hal/dbus in xorg are
> input devices.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> Allan McRae schrieb:
>>>
>>> That works for me. I initially thought it was strange that it came on
>>> but now I see why. extreme-tuxracer is giving me (>50%) more FPS with this
>>> update.
>>
>> Intel DRM has been
Hmm... strange... but it's fine the way it is :)
Thanks
2009/12/5 Thomas Bächler
> Gabriel Morrison Lima Dantas schrieb:
>
>> Removing radeon from initramfs and putting it in MODULES section of
>> rc.conf
>> solves the problem.
>>
>
> Hm, I hope you are happy this way until we know what's going
Gabriel Morrison Lima Dantas schrieb:
Removing radeon from initramfs and putting it in MODULES section of rc.conf
solves the problem.
Hm, I hope you are happy this way until we know what's going on ... the
problem is certainly not that the firmware is not put in initramfs, but
something else
Removing radeon from initramfs and putting it in MODULES section of rc.conf
solves the problem.
2009/12/5 Thomas Bächler
> Gabriel Morrison Lima Dantas schrieb:
>
> Hi, I installed kernel26 and kernel26-firmware from testing, and I'm
>> experiencing some problems with KMS. During system initial
Am Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:30:10 +0100
schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase :
> You could try this one
> (http://phraktured.net/archlinux-2009.12-netinstall-x86_64.iso) we are
> currently preparing for the next release. It uses a newer kernel and
> isolinux. Please tell us the results. That image I linked is
>
Gabriel Morrison Lima Dantas schrieb:
Hi, I installed kernel26 and kernel26-firmware from testing, and I'm
experiencing some problems with KMS. During system initialization, the
system requests the firmware radeon/R300_cp.bin, waits a couple of seconds
and then proceeds normal initialization. But
Hi, I installed kernel26 and kernel26-firmware from testing, and I'm
experiencing some problems with KMS. During system initialization, the
system requests the firmware radeon/R300_cp.bin, waits a couple of seconds
and then proceeds normal initialization. But when I log into X, DRI isn't
enabled. C
>
>> If Arch wants to be (disk)size-effective, We would end up with hundreds
>> of Debian-like *-{header,dev} packages.
>
> We're not going to do that, it just seemed insane to include this stuff in
> the kernel.
>
>> I just don't think splitting header packages is practical with distributions
>>
nez...@allurelinux.org schrieb:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Attila wrote:
At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header
packages?
First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amoun
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Attila wrote:
> At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
>
> > Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header
> > packages?
>
> First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amount and if
> you
>
On 05.12.2009 07:48, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Freitag 04 Dezember 2009 schrieb Heiko Baums:
>
>> Am Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:09:36 +0100
>>
>> schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
>>
>>> You could try archboot isos linked here:
>>> ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/iso/archboot
>>>
>> This iso boots fin
At Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009 09:56 Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> Isn't it against Arch philosophy to split packages it binary and header
> packages?
First the headers from the kernel package was even a reduced amount and if you
look in the PKGBUILD only for the cases if you build some packages for yo
Am Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:48:13 +0100
schrieb Tobias Powalowski :
> Sure but at least you can install arch now :)
I can install Arch with the core and netinstall isos, too.
I just need to execute `udevadm trigger` and `exit` at the ramfs$
prompt. Then it continues booting. ;-)
I looked at the hooks
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 09:31 +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Samstag 05 Dezember 2009 09:00:38 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> > - splitted kernel-headers to extra package
> > If you want to build external modules please install:
> > pacman -S kernel26-headers
> > Please change your PKGBUILDS t
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2009/12/4 Allan McRae :
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2009/12/4 Daenyth Blank :
2009/12/4 Lukáš Jirkovský :
Hi everyone,
I've just noticed coreutils 8.1 in [testing] repo and I think I should
warn you. Unfortunatelly it has one quite bad regression which can
break quite many s
2009/12/4 Allan McRae :
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/4 Daenyth Blank :
>>>
>>> 2009/12/4 Lukáš Jirkovský :
Hi everyone,
I've just noticed coreutils 8.1 in [testing] repo and I think I should
warn you. Unfortunatelly it has one quite bad regression which can
break
Hi guys,
kernel 2.6.32 first test run ...
Upstream changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16855 # added CONFIG_PM_DEBUG
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE
Arch Linux changes:
- splitted kerne
32 matches
Mail list logo
