[arch-general] Virtualbox and Kernel 2.6.32.2-2

2009-12-30 Thread Guillermo Leira
Hello! I have just upgraded to this new kernel, and I have a little problem: I have an i686 Virtual Machine running under VirtualBox, on Windows XP. Since this upgrade, as soon as I enter my password, the system gets completely locked. If I press Ctrl-Alt-F1, I can switch to tty1, but if I get

Re: [arch-general] Virtualbox and Kernel 2.6.32.2-2

2009-12-30 Thread Guillermo Leira
I have just upgraded to this new kernel, and I have a little problem: I have an i686 Virtual Machine running under VirtualBox, on Windows XP. Since this upgrade, as soon as I enter my password, the system gets completely locked. If I press Ctrl-Alt-F1, I can switch to tty1, but if I get

Re: [arch-general] firewire_net, 2.6.32.2-2

2009-12-30 Thread Damjan Georgievski
after last kernel update my ethernet over firewire doesn't work any more. Module, firewire_net, is correctly loaded and new interface firewire0 shows up. I can ping other hosts but I can not establish any connections (http, irc, anything). if you can ping, the drivers should be fine. Check

[arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-30 Thread Steve Holmes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hey, has anyone been experiencing any problems with the newest kernel26 package from Arch? this would be 2.6.32.2. After upgrading to it, my machine starts to boot but then dies. When I downgrade to kernel26-2.6.31.6, all works fine again. I'm

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-30 Thread Chris Brannon
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de writes: If you, too, don't use [testing] and get kernel panics then this is because there is at least one important package update which is needed by kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 missing in [core]. I guess it's mkinitcpio. If you update your system to [testing] then it

Re: [arch-general] Kernel panic with kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core]

2009-12-30 Thread Partha Chowdhury
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 05:22:33PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: Hi, I already filed a bug report but thought it couldn't harm or even be good to post it to the mailing list, too. Since the update to kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core] I can't boot this kernel anymore. I always get a kernel panic

Re: [arch-general] Kernel panic with kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core]

2009-12-30 Thread Steve Holmes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 08:29:01AM +0530, Partha Chowdhury wrote: i just updated my system yesterday to kernel 2.6.32.2-2. I faced no problem. It is running as usual.After reading your mail, i looked in the pacman update log and found that

Re: [arch-general] Kernel panic with kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core]

2009-12-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:29:01 +0530 schrieb Partha Chowdhury par...@gmx.us: i just updated my system yesterday to kernel 2.6.32.2-2. I faced no problem. It is running as usual.After reading your mail, i looked in the pacman update log and found that only kernel and virtualbox were

Re: [arch-general] Kernel panic with kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core]

2009-12-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:24:24 -0700 schrieb Steve Holmes steve.holme...@gmail.com: I'll have to look to see if I have the same problem. I wonder why some people have been able to upgrade the kernel without incident and others are having the problem with the panic? What version of mkinitcpio

Re: [arch-general] Kernel panic with kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core]

2009-12-30 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:37:48 +0100 schrieb Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de: The problem occurs with mkinitcpio 0.5.26-1 from [core] but is fixed with mkinitcpio 0.5.26-2 from [testing]. I don't know if only the mkinitcpio update fixed the issue or if there were other package updates from

Re: [arch-general] Kernel panic with kernel26 2.6.32.2-2 from [core]

2009-12-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 04:35 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:29:01 +0530 schrieb Partha Chowdhury par...@gmx.us: i just updated my system yesterday to kernel 2.6.32.2-2. I faced no problem. It is running as usual.After reading your mail, i looked in the pacman update log