Listmates
I had a failing drive in my arch server so I installed a new one. The bios raid
'nvidia dmraid' provides the feature to 'Rebuild' the array and allows for
adding the new disk to the array. After that configuration you are prompted to
"Boot to an OS that supports rebuilding.." (or somethi
Am oder ungefähr am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On 01/19/2010 01:37 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
>
> I stumbled into a part solution to the problem for firefox and other mozilla
> apps. Basically there is a new type of "skin" you can use called user space
> skins that use
On 01/20/2010 02:24 PM, Slash wrote:
>
> Most of my applications are console, but I have been using the
> Murrina-Black GTK2 theme for a long time (~2 years) without issues. In
> regards to white websites, I just deal with it. Like other people
> said, as long as you aren't sitting in the dark, it
On Thursday 21 January 2010 00:50:22 David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote:
> >> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two b
>> On 01/19/2010 08:09 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>
>>> sorry for hijacking your thread but speaking of dark themes, I have been
>>> looking for ages for a nice reverse theme for gtk+ but every single one
>>> I remember wasn't perfect... Anyone 100% happy with a reverse theme?
>>
Most of my a
On 01/20/2010 09:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tobias, all,
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
It was ironic, because I was using W
On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Tobias, all,
>
> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>
> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
>
> It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the ke
On 01/20/2010 09:21 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tobias, all,
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills Virtual
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> Tobias, all,
>>
>> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>>
>> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
>> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
>>
>> It was ironic, becaus
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>>
>> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
>> (2) the kerne
Processes are still being randomly killed by oom-killer here even tho
there's lots of free swap available, most of the time ksmserver which kills
the kde session. It's been happening since updating to 2.6.32 series. The
issue is discussed here (with patch):
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=1
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 07:42 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> bump to latest bugfix version.
> Please signoff both arches,
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Everything working perfectly as usual. 32bit kernel with nvidia kernel
module.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tobias, all,
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>
> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
even with 2.6.32.3, I had to
On 01/20/2010 11:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the
kernel
Just a suggestion: I usually drop down to single user ("sudo telinit
s") before I install major packages like a kernel.
DR
On 01/20/2010 03:49 AM, Mikael Eriksson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>> And most importantly, how the /heck/ do you handle the *bright*
>> *white* pages of the web... I'd tried creating a custom CSS for me,
>> but it broke too many pages...
>
> I us
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:51 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >> bump to latest bugfix version.
> >> Please signoff both arches,
> >>
> >> greetings
> >> tpowa
> >
> > Can't 'sign off'
On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> bump to latest bugfix version.
>> Please signoff both arches,
>>
>> greetings
>> tpowa
>
> Can't 'sign off', but kernel26 2.6.32.4-1 seems to be working fine on x86_64
> with nvidia. I'
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:01:09 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100
> > Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> >
> >> The only drawback right now is that sup is still
> >> very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's t
On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100
Philipp Überbacher wrote:
The only drawback right now is that sup is still
very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail
client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially
when
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100
Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> The only drawback right now is that sup is still
> very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail
> client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially
> when it comes to reading and searching and I don
Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of Wed Jan 20 13:08:19 +0100 2010:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 04:43 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:12:31PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > Probably because (in my experience at least) top-posting occurs much
> > > more frequently than "me too"
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Steve Holmes
> wrote:
>> Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse
>> chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and
>> nobody seems to complain about that concept.
>
2010/1/20 Johannes Held :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Holmes :
>> If I addopt bottom posting, I plan then to delete all but the most recent
>> post to keep thing conscise.
> Sure! That's the right(tm) way to do it. ;-)
>
>> Actually I'm run into *MANY* of these huge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Holmes :
> If I addopt bottom posting, I plan then to delete all but the most recent
> post to keep thing conscise.
Sure! That's the right(tm) way to do it. ;-)
> Actually I'm run into *MANY* of these huge long threads in a single
> message to h
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
> Actually when you think about it, most blogs are all in reverse
> chronical order which to me is the same thing as top-posting and
> nobody seems to complain about that concept.
Separate blog posts are typically unrelated, so there is no reas
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 04:43 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:12:31PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Probably because (in my experience at least) top-posting occurs much
> > more frequently than "me too" posts at least, probably more frequently
> > than improper quoting as well.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:12:31PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Probably because (in my experience at least) top-posting occurs much
> more frequently than "me too" posts at least, probably more frequently
> than improper quoting as well.
And yet wh
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> And most importantly, how the /heck/ do you handle the *bright*
> *white* pages of the web... I'd tried creating a custom CSS for me,
> but it broke too many pages...
I use the BYM[0] extension for firefox. It removes image bac
29 matches
Mail list logo
