On 01/02/2010, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
>> 2010/1/31, f...@kokkinizita.net :
>> > that means that cdrkit has been renamed to cdrtools ? :-)
>>
>> Of course, it means that the software has benn renamed or replaced by
>> another
On 02/01/2010 11:01 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
Hm,
would be nice. :-) I ve been digging into SELinux and Arch lately, and yes
some more official support would be nice. If there is something being organized,
I'd gladly help, at least in this SEL
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Nicky726 wrote:
> Hm,
>
> would be nice. :-) I ve been digging into SELinux and Arch lately, and yes
> some more official support would be nice. If there is something being
> organized,
> I'd gladly help, at least in this SELinux area.
>
security isnt about SELin
On 01/31/2010 09:18 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 01/31/2010 08:31 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>
> Key signing is not required for us I think. Because Arch people are
> the first to release package updates. It is tested properly and is
> given in .tar.gz archives. Even if a byte i
On 01/31/2010 10:25 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 09:45 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> On 01/31/2010 10:31 PM, Alexander Lam wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>
>
> Eh. I cannot keep on switching the User Agent every time I start
> firefox. So about:config :D ;)
>
The about:config way will als
On 02/01/2010 09:45 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 01/31/2010 10:31 PM, Alexander Lam wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Giuseppe Turrisi
wrote:
Il 31/01/2010 12:30, Jan de Groot ha scritto:
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 16:58 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Something is seriously funny
On 01/31/2010 08:31 PM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
I really like Arch. I switched about a year ago after being a Debian
user for nine years. There is something that troubles me though about
Arch. Its lack of security focus. By this I mean there is no
consistent way that security issues are dealt w
On 01/31/2010 10:31 PM, Alexander Lam wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Giuseppe Turrisi
wrote:
Il 31/01/2010 12:30, Jan de Groot ha scritto:
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 16:58 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Something is seriously funny going on here with FF 3.5.7 (Shiretoko).
I'm using
On 30-01-2010 12:58, Baho Utot wrote:
I don't think you "get it".
First of all, I don't care what happened when the split or fork
happened. It makes _ZERO_ difference to me.
This is what I have done because of _your_ direct actions on this list
and other actions by you on some news groups I rea
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 20:11, Brendan Long wrote:
> The difference between replaced and renamed is significant though.
> There's no reason not to replace kernel-headers with linux-api-headers,
> but there are some other packages (cdrtools vs cdrkit comes to mind)
> that would give the same messag
On 01/31/2010 04:24 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/1, f...@kokkinizita.net :
>
>> Pacman did *not* tell him this was just a rename.
>>
> pacman just ask him if he wants to replace kernel-headers by
> api-headers, but it's obvious that software has been renamed or
> replaced by anothe
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> inetutils-1.7-2 is in testing. The localstatedir was fixed (FS#17981).
>
> Please test and signoff. Users signoff will be appreciated as not a
> lot of devs use these tools.
>
> Eric
>
bump. Anyone?
2010/2/1, f...@kokkinizita.net :
> Pacman did *not* tell him this was just a rename.
pacman just ask him if he wants to replace kernel-headers by
api-headers, but it's obvious that software has been renamed or
replaced by another one.
If you dislike that behaviour, please send a request to pacman
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/1/31, f...@kokkinizita.net :
> > that means that cdrkit has been renamed to cdrtools ? :-)
>
> Of course, it means that the software has benn renamed or replaced by
> another one.
So it can mean two very different things.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/1/31, f...@kokkinizita.net :
> > that means that cdrkit has been renamed to cdrtools ? :-)
>
> Of course, it means that the software has benn renamed or replaced by
> another one.
>
>
> --
> Arch Linux Developer
> http://
2010/1/31, f...@kokkinizita.net :
> that means that cdrkit has been renamed to cdrtools ? :-)
Of course, it means that the software has benn renamed or replaced by
another one.
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 23:45 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:26:02PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> > 2010/1/31, Hussam Al-Tayeb :
> > > Or simply tell him the the package kernel-headers was renamed to
> > > linux-api-headers?
> >
> > Nope, pacman already said him
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:26:02PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/1/31, Hussam Al-Tayeb :
> > Or simply tell him the the package kernel-headers was renamed to
> > linux-api-headers?
>
> Nope, pacman already said him that. :-)
So, if pacman ever asks:
Replace cdrkit by cdrtools ? [Yn]
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 23:26 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/1/31, Hussam Al-Tayeb :
> > Or simply tell him the the package kernel-headers was renamed to
> > linux-api-headers?
>
> Nope, pacman already said him that. :-)
>
>
Give a man a fish
Am 31.01.2010 22:05, schrieb richard terry:
Hi List,
Just went to do a system upgrade and noticed this and unsure what it means or
if I should so Yes:
:: Replace kernel-headers with core/linux-api-headers? [Y/n] n
Any comments?
Thanks in anticipation.
Richard
Hello,
That was just a renam
2010/1/31, Hussam Al-Tayeb :
> Or simply tell him the the package kernel-headers was renamed to
> linux-api-headers?
Nope, pacman already said him that. :-)
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 15:22 -0600, Daniel Griffiths wrote:
> On 01/31/2010 03:05 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Just went to do a system upgrade and noticed this and unsure what it
> means or
> > if I should so Yes:
> >
> > :: Replace kernel-headers with core/linux-api-headers? [Y/n]
Ray Rashif writes:
> In the latest kernel, there is 'make localmodconfig' for precisely
> this problem.
Thanks to all of you, I recorded everything so I'll try next time.
By the way I had to mask the kernel26 build (even if I don't use it)
because broadcom-wl is always a bit too late and it woul
You can simply install it through "pacman -S kernel26-lts" and edit you
bootloader configuration to point to the new ramdisk and kernel image.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:02 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> On 01/31/10 10:54, Jan de Groot wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 10:34 -0600, William A
On 01/31/2010 03:05 PM, richard terry wrote:
Hi List,
Just went to do a system upgrade and noticed this and unsure what it means or
if I should so Yes:
:: Replace kernel-headers with core/linux-api-headers? [Y/n] n
Any comments?
Thanks in anticipation.
Richard
This has been discussed s
Hi List,
Just went to do a system upgrade and noticed this and unsure what it means or
if I should so Yes:
:: Replace kernel-headers with core/linux-api-headers? [Y/n] n
Any comments?
Thanks in anticipation.
Richard
On 31/01/2010, Andrea Fagiani wrote:
> On 01/30/2010 01:37 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Am Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:11:26 +0100
>> schrieb Andrea Crotti:
>>
>>
>>> Sometimes (only twice actually) I had to recompile the kernel with ice
>>> support from aur.
>>> Now compiling the kernel is not a short job,
On 01/31/10 10:54, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 10:34 -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I am new to the list, used Linux since Caldera 2.2. I noticed
references to a kernel-lts, labelled as 'long-time-support' on the Arch
website. I did a bit of googling& noticed refer
2010/1/31 Alexander Lam :
> Starting with the obvious.
> did you select the right device in alsamixer? (use F6)
Nope... did that and moved it from 70% to 100%, it's a lot more
manageable now. It's still a tad weak but it's probably just because
it's a crappy mic. Excellent, thanks!
--
Samuel
Le Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:01:15 +,
Ananda Samaddar a écrit :
> After some discussion we should be able to reach a consensus and
> start giving security issues the priority they deserve.
Maybe this is the problem: some people (including me) might think that
perfect security is not a priority. Th
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Giuseppe Turrisi
wrote:
> Il 31/01/2010 12:30, Jan de Groot ha scritto:
>>
>> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 16:58 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>>>
>>> Something is seriously funny going on here with FF 3.5.7 (Shiretoko).
>>>
>>> I'm using it from the arch repos, but o
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 10:34 -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
> I am new to the list, used Linux since Caldera 2.2. I noticed
> references to a kernel-lts, labelled as 'long-time-support' on the Arch
> website. I did a bit of googling & noticed references to such from Arch
> & Ubuntu
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
>
> The topic says it all. I've got a new microphone, and whereas it
> works, it's rather quiet when I try to record it wtih audacity. Most
> people on skype complain that my voice is rather quiet as well, and I
> have to basically put the mic
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:36:50 +0100
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> No, what I meant was that difference between having package pool to
> which packages are linked and sending some text file to all servers
> saying "Hi, please move package foo-1.2.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz from
> [testing] to [core]" which wou
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:24:22 +0100
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I didn't understand what you meant first time. I think I got it now.
> If I understand it well you mean having all packages in one directory
> on server and the repos would be differentiated by some text files or
> symlinks. The differe
I am new to the list, used Linux since Caldera 2.2. I noticed
references to a kernel-lts, labelled as 'long-time-support' on the Arch
website. I did a bit of googling & noticed references to such from Arch
& Ubuntu forums. I found no references at kernel.org, although I noticed
that the
On 31 January 2010 17:15, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 17:14:05 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský:
>> I think that the syncing would be much less painful if there was some
>> possibility to tell mirrors that package foo has been moved from
>> [testing] to [extra]. Then these rebuilds
Hm,
would be nice. :-) I ve been digging into SELinux and Arch lately, and yes
some more official support would be nice. If there is something being
organized,
I'd gladly help, at least in this SELinux area.
Regards,
Ondrej Vadinsky
--
Don`t it always seem to go
That you don`t know what you`
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 17:14:05 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský:
> I think that the syncing would be much less painful if there was some
> possibility to tell mirrors that package foo has been moved from
> [testing] to [extra]. Then these rebuilds would be only a matter of
> distributing information w
On 31 January 2010 17:05, Hannes Rist wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> There are several methods to improve the situation:
>> * multi tier mirroring. Roman started to work on this but might need
> some help
>> here. It's mostly an organizing task
>
> I strongly second that. Having a geographically organized hier
Hi,
> There are several methods to improve the situation:
> * multi tier mirroring. Roman started to work on this but might need
some help
> here. It's mostly an organizing task
I strongly second that. Having a geographically organized hierarchy would
be nice, so that there are tier-1 mirrors in
2010/1/31 Joerg Schilling :
> virus_found wrote:
>
>> Now you know about several of those cases, for I wasn't able to burn my
>> CD on a modern device (Lenovo SL500's DVD device) with cdrtools
>> (alpha67, IIRC), but I was able to do it with
>> cdrkit without an issue.
>
> There is a 99.9%
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:01, Ananda Samaddar
wrote:
> I really like Arch. I switched about a year ago after being a Debian
> user for nine years. There is something that troubles me though about
> Arch. Its lack of security focus.
>
Basically this and everything related to it comes down to ma
Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> On the Wiki, Add a small note about cdrtools. proposing it as
> alternate over cdkit.so let the user decide:
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CD_Burning_Tips
This is of course better than doing nothing. Please note however that
this discussion did not start bec
I really like Arch. I switched about a year ago after being a Debian
user for nine years. There is something that troubles me though about
Arch. Its lack of security focus. By this I mean there is no
consistent way that security issues are dealt with. There was a
proposal for 'The Arch Linux Se
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 15:27:03 schrieb Dan McGee:
> Thanks for signing that message, I wasn't sure it was from you.
OT: Can't we strip gpg-signatures from the mailinglist? It's of no use. Use
s/mime instead ;-)
> The problem here is we haven't had anyone step up and finish a two
> tier mir
Baho Utot wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Baho Utot wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that.
> >> It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum
> >> both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2010 03:27 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> As far as pushing goes, that is a bad idea for a number of reasons,
> the primary being one compromised root server gains you ssh access to
> X more servers.
Can be solved easily by using forced commands:
http
On 01/31/2010 04:30 PM, Benedikt Müller wrote:
2010/1/31 Dan McGee:
As far as pushing goes, that is a bad idea for a number of reasons,
the primary being one compromised root server gains you ssh access to
X more servers.
-Dan
I didn't say that it must be root. One user with the only permissi
2010/1/31 Dan McGee :
> As far as pushing goes, that is a bad idea for a number of reasons,
> the primary being one compromised root server gains you ssh access to
> X more servers.
>
> -Dan
>
I didn't say that it must be root. One user with the only permission
to use rsync would be the right for t
> We have a bit update today, and we see: The syncing process is not
> really good. So I suggest to change the procedure mirrorsyncs are
> done: We should have primary and secondary mirrors. When al.org is
> updated, the sync process of the primary mirrors should be started via
> ssh(or something s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We have a bit update today, and we see: The syncing process is not
really good. So I suggest to change the procedure mirrorsyncs are
done: We should have primary and secondary mirrors. When al.org is
updated, the sync process of the primary mirrors sho
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:39 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
>
Man, your desktop theme is _slick_... What is its name?
About the quickstart, I've used it some time, but now i use a taskbar
called Fancy Task. It works as a quick launch and task manager. Very
usefull.
--
A: Because it obfuscates
Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > Would it be worth to do so? I am not convinced. The GPL was intentionally
> > opened against any kind of libraries after it turned out that the first GCC
> > version was legally unusable. I was part of this discussion and thus I know
> > about this fact. The project
Hi,
On the Wiki, Add a small note about cdrtools. proposing it as
alternate over cdkit.so let the user decide:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CD_Burning_Tips
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
www.gaurishsharma.com
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:39:07PM +0100, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
> virus_found wrote:
>
> > Now you know about several of those cases, for I wasn't able to burn my
> > CD on a modern device (Lenovo SL500's DVD device) with cdrtools
> > (alpha67, IIRC), but I was able to do it
Il 31/01/2010 12:30, Jan de Groot ha scritto:
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 16:58 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Something is seriously funny going on here with FF 3.5.7 (Shiretoko).
I'm using it from the arch repos, but on visiting Google Help or Orkut,
it says Browser not supported ?
And the supp
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that.
It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum
both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cdrtools
and they are the same, how did that
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:37:54AM +1100, James Rayner wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:34 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >
> > > You should try the testing version of netcfg instead:
> > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux
virus_found wrote:
> Now you know about several of those cases, for I wasn't able to burn my
> CD on a modern device (Lenovo SL500's DVD device) with cdrtools
> (alpha67, IIRC), but I was able to do it with
> cdrkit without an issue.
There is a 99.9% chance that you are not telling the t
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 16:58 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Something is seriously funny going on here with FF 3.5.7 (Shiretoko).
>
> I'm using it from the arch repos, but on visiting Google Help or Orkut,
> it says Browser not supported ?
>
> And the supported browser list says FF 1.5+
>
>
Something is seriously funny going on here with FF 3.5.7 (Shiretoko).
I'm using it from the arch repos, but on visiting Google Help or Orkut,
it says Browser not supported ?
And the supported browser list says FF 1.5+
Something is wrong with the arch build ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Ser
Baho Utot wrote:
> I have preformed some tests and guess what cdrkit works! Imagine that.
> It burnt the iso's for Slackware distribution, and using md5sum to sum
> both a Slackware distribution disk burned by both cdrkit and cdrtools
> and they are the same, how did that happen?
There is a 9
Hi bump to latest version,
xfsprogs-3.1.1 (29 January 2010)
- Fix various blkid topology support problems in mkfs.xfs.
- Fix various build warnings.
- Add automatic build dependency calculations.
- Cleaner build system output.
- Add missing aclocal m4 file to
Am Samstag 30 Januar 2010 schrieb Allan McRae:
> On 27/01/10 16:18, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hi
> > bump to latest version.
> >
> > Please signoff both arches.
>
> Signoff i686.
> Allan
>
anyone for x86_64?
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.arc
The topic says it all. I've got a new microphone, and whereas it
works, it's rather quiet when I try to record it wtih audacity. Most
people on skype complain that my voice is rather quiet as well, and I
have to basically put the mic in my mouth for them to hear to hear me
properly.
Nothing's show
66 matches
Mail list logo
