On 2 February 2010 13:43, Ty John wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:13:38 -0600
> "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote:
>
>> On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> > Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only
>> > one thing. pacman should support installing multiple ke
Am Sonntag 31 Januar 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Hi bump to latest version,
> xfsprogs-3.1.1 (29 January 2010)
> - Fix various blkid topology support problems in mkfs.xfs.
> - Fix various build warnings.
> - Add automatic build dependency calculations.
> - Cleaner buil
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:13:38 -0600
"William A. Mahaffey III" wrote:
> On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> > Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only
> > one thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels.
> > Developers need not maintain the old
Allan McRae wrote:
Well, there was a news item saying it would be best to wait a couple of
days to do an update... but no-one ever listens to us.
And yet they're still using Archlinux. True love!
regards,
Hannes
--
Hannes Rist
++
| Crew Se
On 02/01/10 23:10, Allan McRae wrote:
On 02/02/10 15:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only
one thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels.
Developers need not maintain th
On 02/02/10 15:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only
one thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels.
Developers need not maintain the old version. Let it be in the cache
o
On 02/01/10 21:59, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only
one thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels.
Developers need not maintain the old version. Let it be in the cache
of the user. But pacman should not remove the olde
On 02/02/2010 09:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only one
thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels. Developers need
not maintain the old version. Let it be in the ca
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only one
> thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels. Developers need
> not maintain the old version. Let it be in the cache of the user. But pacman
> should n
On 02/01/2010 05:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 01/02/10 21:57, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
On Monday 01 February 2010 16:09:08 solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
prelink modifies binary and library to ... prelink ;-) them. during the
days of kde 3 I noticed a significant improvement in loading time of
appli
Well, Arch is rolling release distro, I agree. Arch rocks. But only one
thing. pacman should support installing multiple kernels. Developers
need not maintain the old version. Let it be in the cache of the user.
But pacman should not remove the older one after upgrade.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
S
On 02/02/10 13:01, Steve Holmes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:42:32AM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
mirrors.kernel.org in fact is not a single mirror. is an alias to a
geolocation subdomain and from there is serving from closer
geographically position(in theory).
for you maybe you hit in an up to
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:42:32AM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote:
> mirrors.kernel.org in fact is not a single mirror. is an alias to a
> geolocation subdomain and from there is serving from closer
> geographically position(in theory).
> for you maybe you hit in an up to date server.
I don't know but I'
On 02/02/2010 04:29 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I'm also having major problems upgrading my system. Pacman errors out
and it tells me I have 77 packages to update and I was current two
days ago.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Steve Holmes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> I'm also having major problems upgrading my system. Pacman errors out
> and it tells me I have 77 packages to update and I was current two
> days ago. I believe it is 77 and counting.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I'm also having major problems upgrading my system. Pacman errors out
and it tells me I have 77 packages to update and I was current two
days ago. I believe it is 77 and counting. Last night it was 66.
I'm using the kernel.org site for my pack
On 01-02-2010 06:17, Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Armando M. Baratti" wrote:
Strange, I have had the opposite experience.
Trying to burn some CDs with cdrkit (on CentOS) give some problem with
not being able to generate Joliet system and I have had trouble with
utf-8 too.
First I thought I was mak
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 06:09:58PM -0500, dave reisner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, wrote:
>
> > On Arch you of course always have the 'fallback' boot
> > option (which can be expected to work), or you can boot
> > from the original netinstall CD. But it's by no means
> > clear to me
Am Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:09:58 -0500
schrieb dave reisner :
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, wrote:
>
> > On Arch you of course always have the 'fallback' boot
> > option (which can be expected to work), or you can boot
> > from the original netinstall CD. But it's by no means
> > clear to me how
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, wrote:
> On Arch you of course always have the 'fallback' boot
> option (which can be expected to work), or you can boot
> from the original netinstall CD. But it's by no means
> clear to me how you could 'rewind' a failed kernel update
> using either of these.
>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:48:14PM +0100, Tom wrote:
> > Mantaining multiple kernels would only add overhead on developers'
> > work, and bloating /boot.
>
> I don't really get that. I'm no expert in using pacman or writing
> PKGBUILDs, but I can very readily imagine a mechanism that on each
> ro
> We have a bit update today, and we see: The syncing process is not
> really good.
There's also the problem that some mirrors (most of the ones I've
tried) sync the package database before syncing all the packages.
So "pacman -Syu" errors-out because it can't download some packages.
So I either
Am Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:08:23 +0100
schrieb Attila :
> One of them which is important be the kernel. So if pacman would have
> the option to install a certain version of a package than the user
> need only to know if there is more than one version in db. So perhaps
> this coould be solved at exampl
Le Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:21:03 +0100,
Heiko Baums a écrit :
> If a security bug is found it should be filed to and fixed by upstream
> anyway.
This is true, except sometimes upstream patching can take a while and
it would be a good idea to warn users about the problem in the meantime
so that they c
>> And if you really need to downgrade the kernel or another package just
>> do it with pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/-.
>
> I know this is the No.1 hint but this solution is not very well from my view
> because instead the hardidsk getting bigger and bigger it sounds unlogical to
> keep a lot of
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:13:55 -0500
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 17:11, Ty John wrote:
> > Basically, I want to set and unset the variable when I connect and
> > disconnect the VPN.
>
> The best way is probably to have a set of aliases in your bashrc that
> run it and set the var
At Montag, 1. Februar 2010 22:08 Heiko Baums wrote:
At first i want to say that i'm not interested for that the devs have to have
too much work.
> And if you really need to downgrade the kernel or another package just
> do it with pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/-.
I know this is the No.1 hint
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 17:11, Ty John wrote:
> Basically, I want to set and unset the variable when I connect and
> disconnect the VPN.
The best way is probably to have a set of aliases in your bashrc that
run it and set the variables. Scripts and functions cannpt modify the
calling environment.
Could there be a rename/fork rss feed ?
I'm regularly connecting and disconnecting to a VPN using vpnc. The
network I connect to has a transparent proxy which I want to set
$http_proxy to.
I thought I could do something like
export http_proxy="proxy.whatever.com"
in the /etc/rc.d/vpnc file, in the start and stop functions as
necessary
2010/2/1 Xavier Chantry
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM, ludovic coues wrote:
> >>
> >> WAIT WHAT?
> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/kernel26-lts/
> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/kernel26-lts/
> >>
> >
> > lts is not for everyday desktop usage.
> >
>
> Who said
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 01/02/10 13:08, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> exim has no maintainer and I have been assigned a bug for it as the last
>> person to rebuild it (db-4.8 rebuild). I do not use it and have no
>> intentions of fixing the bug. Does anybody want to be
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> Sounds like the real problem is pacman's message then. My suggestion:
> change "package x has been replaced by package y" to "package x has been
> renamed package y".
>
fork/alternative != rename
The term 'replace' is more general than a ren
On 2 February 2010 05:29, Ty John wrote:
> I'm not subscribed to it either and I must admit that I was a bit
> surprised when I saw the message while updating.
> I may be wrong but I believe pacman is limited in the way it produces
> informing messages in that it can only do so in a post install s
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM, ludovic coues wrote:
>>
>> WAIT WHAT?
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/kernel26-lts/
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/kernel26-lts/
>>
>
> lts is not for everyday desktop usage.
>
Who said anything about desktop usage ?
It is useful fo
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ananda Samaddar
wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:14:18 -0600
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daenyth Blank
>>
>> Don't forget: everyone is interested in "starting discussions" or
>> "planning" or "drawing up plans", but when it comes to t
On 02/01/2010 12:08 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> Oh nono, $replaces isn't used like that. When for instance you have
> deleted a package and brought in a new one with a different name,
> often due to a name change (upstream or not), you need to make sure
> pacman will know and seamlessly "update" to the
On 02/01/2010 09:06 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> [snip]
> Oh my! A bug! But software never has bugs, and we should test
> everything for months before releasing it!
>
> Seriously, do you think we purposely release buggy software? (We
> don't) Do strive for a rock solid system? No, because our users (and
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:35:56 +0800
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 21:08 +1030, Ty John wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:08:33 +0800
> > Ray Rashif wrote:
> >
> > > On 01/02/2010, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora
> > > > wr
Am Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:17:51 -0500
schrieb Carlos Williams :
> How does Arch Linux far behind in security as compared to Debian.
> Perhaps I caught this conversation late but I would like to know what
> makes Debian better in aspects of security -vs- Arch? Can anyone
> please explain?
Debian keeps
Am Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:48:14 +0100
schrieb Tom :
> I don't really get that. I'm no expert in using pacman or writing
> PKGBUILDs, but I can very readily imagine a mechanism that on each
> rolling release update to the kernel, moves the current kernel on the
> users system to say 'kernel-previous',
On 1 February 2010 06:27, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> While I was using Fedora, the first thing after installing the OS was to
> disable SELinux :D
I thought to myself I might have a look at some SELinux guides on the
web, seeing as it could be a useful tool. I was rather put off that
the first
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:14:18 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daenyth Blank
>
> Don't forget: everyone is interested in "starting discussions" or
> "planning" or "drawing up plans", but when it comes to the actual work
> well, then the original initiators get disinter
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 15:17, Carlos Williams wrote:
> How does Arch Linux far behind in security as compared to Debian.
> Perhaps I caught this conversation late but I would like to know what
> makes Debian better in aspects of security -vs- Arch? Can anyone
> please explain?
>
Mainly package si
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:01, Ananda Samaddar
>> wrote:
>>> I really like Arch. I switched about a year ago after being a Debian
>>> user for nine years. There is something that trou
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:01, Ananda Samaddar
> wrote:
>> I really like Arch. I switched about a year ago after being a Debian
>> user for nine years. There is something that troubles me though about
>> Arch. Its lack of security focus.
>
> After all, you really should compile your own kernels, and keep
> backups around just in case you break something there yourself...
What I mean is, for me, the official arch-kernel IS the main backup...
;)
> Mantaining multiple kernels would only add overhead on developers'
> work, and bloating /boot.
I don't really get that. I'm no expert in using pacman or writing
PKGBUILDs, but I can very readily imagine a mechanism that on each
rolling release update to the kernel, moves the current kernel on th
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:16:09 -0500
> schrieb Andrew Antle :
>
>> >> Do you have a link to this PDF?
>> >
>> > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
>> >
>> > Cf. http://sta.li/faq
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto
Am Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:16:09 -0500
schrieb Andrew Antle :
> >> Do you have a link to this PDF?
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
> >
> > Cf. http://sta.li/faq
>
> http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
Thanks for the links.
Greetings,
Heiko
Dan McGee wrote:
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan :
On 02/01/2010 08:53 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:59 +0100, ludovic coues wrote:
2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
How to install multiple ke
Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous kernels
so that if a new one is buggy, then the old one can be used.
QFT.
WAIT WHAT?
h
Hi,
this is a small fix for the bug reported here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=699763
Now, you have to set explicit the plugin path to the kernel mode
plugin if you want to use it. So, it's up to you if you need it or
not and it won't be set anymore as default, because it generated
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:43 -0500, Ray Kohler wrote:
> 2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan :
> > Agreed. But recently a USB problem (possibly a bug) was being discussed
> > heavily on the forums. What about it ? Didn't the developers test the kernel
> > properly before releasing it to the community ?
>
>
>> Do you have a link to this PDF?
>
> http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
>
> Cf. http://sta.li/faq
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
--
Andrew Antle
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Static libraries are bad. Besides taking up diskspace, they're just
>> bad to use. Ulrich Drepper has a nice PDF about this.
>
> Do you have a link to this PDF?
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
Cf. http://sta.li/faq
-
Am Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:14:27 +0100
schrieb Jan de Groot :
> If a program is built static against an insecure library, upgrading
> the insecure library means the static binary is still vulnerable.
> That's what Allan means.
Well, that's obvious.
> When we switch to glibc-based initramfs, there sh
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan :
> Agreed. But recently a USB problem (possibly a bug) was being discussed
> heavily on the forums. What about it ? Didn't the developers test the kernel
> properly before releasing it to the community ?
Can you point me to this thread? Forum search and google aren't
I believe what you want is the eye of gnome application, a
middleweight image viewer.
sudo pacman -S eog
Best regards
Nicklas W Bjurman
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Leandro Inacio
wrote:
> Please,
>
> pacman -Sg gnome-extra
>
> after
>
> pacman -Si package_name | grep -i Description
>
> Look
Please,
pacman -Sg gnome-extra
after
pacman -Si package_name | grep -i Description
Lookup the package that you needs, some questions are answered with pacman
commands.
And do what Ionut said.
--
Leandro Inácio
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 13:21, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:15
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan :
> Agreed. But recently a USB problem (possibly a bug) was being discussed
> heavily on the forums. What about it ? Didn't the developers test the kernel
> properly before releasing it to the community ?
want to improve this situation ? use [testing] in arch, report b
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I have Gnome Desktop Environment up and running perfect on my Arch
> x86_64 system but I elected to not install "gnome-extra" packages
> because it installs too much junk I don't want and or need. My
> question is I am missing two applicati
On 02/01/2010 06:15 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
I have Gnome Desktop Environment up and running perfect on my Arch
x86_64 system but I elected to not install "gnome-extra" packages
because it installs too much junk I don't want and or need. My
question is I am missing two applications from Gnome a
I have Gnome Desktop Environment up and running perfect on my Arch
x86_64 system but I elected to not install "gnome-extra" packages
because it installs too much junk I don't want and or need. My
question is I am missing two applications from Gnome and don't know
what they're called and or what to
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan :
> Agreed. But recently a USB problem (possibly a bug) was being discussed
> heavily on the forums. What about it ? Didn't the developers test the kernel
> properly before releasing it to the community ?
>
They do test the kernel, but you can't possibly expect them to
And the second version of dmesg...
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC5] (IRQs 16) *0, disabled.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC6] (IRQs 16) *0, disabled.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC7] (IRQs 16) *0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC8] (IRQs 16) *0, disabled.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCF] (IRQs 20 21 22 23)
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan :
> On 02/01/2010 08:53 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:59 +0100, ludovic coues wrote:
>>>
>>> 2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
>>>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
>
> How to install multiple kernels using pacman
I can not attach all the dmesg output (bigger than 40kbytes) so i'll send it
in two parts,ok?
Also, i found that my friend's desktop (64-bit) and my old IBM T42 (32-bit)
have the same problem...
But not a somewhat old HP desktop (32bit) i use as a fileserver...
All of them are having Archlinux and
On 02/01/2010 08:53 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:59 +0100, ludovic coues wrote:
2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previ
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:59 +0100, ludovic coues wrote:
> 2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
>
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
> > wrote:
> > > How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
> > >
> > > Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous
> > kernels
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:39:08AM +0100, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> hi.
> preload and prelink are NOT the same thing.
> ...
>
Thx for your explanation.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 09:59, ludovic coues wrote:
> 2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
> lts is not for everyday desktop usage.
>
> By the way, there should be a way to get older with something like that
> pacman -S kernel26-2.6.32.6-1
>
Arch is a rolling release distro. The repo only keeps one version
On 02/01/10 08:59, ludovic coues wrote:
2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous
kernels
so that if a new one
2010/2/1 Emmanuel Benisty
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
> wrote:
> > How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
> >
> > Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous
> kernels
> > so that if a new one is buggy, then the old one can be used.
>
> QF
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 14:59 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000
> schrieb Allan McRae :
>
> > I disagree. Static libraries generally suck and hide rebuilds needed
> > for security issues. So unless something specifically needs the
> > static library, I think it should
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
>
> Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous kernels
> so that if a new one is buggy, then the old one can be used.
QFT.
WAIT WHAT?
http://www.archlinux.org/packa
Am Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> I disagree. Static libraries generally suck and hide rebuilds needed
> for security issues. So unless something specifically needs the
> static library, I think it should be removed.
Such rebuilds are only hidden if a program is linked
You can still use it, starting fallback kernel and downgrading it with
pacman.
Mantaining multiple kernels would only add overhead on developers' work, and
bloating /boot.
2010/2/1 Nilesh Govindarajan
> How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
>
> Arch should do something like Fedora/Redha
How to install multiple kernels using pacman ?
Arch should do something like Fedora/Redhat. Maintain 1-2 previous
kernels so that if a new one is buggy, then the old one can be used.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com
On 01/02/10 22:11, Heiko Baums wrote:
Hi,
I had this issue only twice by now, but I think this is a general
problem.
In the recent times libraries in the repos are only built dynamically
while the statical versions are disabled.
This can lead to several problems if someone needs to compile a p
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 21:08 +1030, Ty John wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:08:33 +0800
> Ray Rashif wrote:
>
> > On 01/02/2010, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> > >> 2010/1/31, f...@kokkinizita.net :
> > >> > that means that cd
On 01/02/10 21:57, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
On Monday 01 February 2010 16:09:08 solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
prelink modifies binary and library to ... prelink ;-) them. during the
days of kde 3 I noticed a significant improvement in loading time of
applications. I have dropped its use (prelink ...
Hi,
I had this issue only twice by now, but I think this is a general
problem.
In the recent times libraries in the repos are only built dynamically
while the statical versions are disabled.
This can lead to several problems if someone needs to compile a program
and needs to link statically agai
On Monday 01 February 2010 16:09:08 solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> prelink modifies binary and library to ... prelink ;-) them. during the
> days of kde 3 I noticed a significant improvement in loading time of
> applications. I have dropped its use (prelink ... and kde3) because some
> recent binutils(o
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 13:20 +0200, Thanos Zygouris wrote:
> Output of lsmod | grep cdrom
> cdrom 36354 1 sr_mod
>
> As for the controller, i am not sure...my mothermoard uses the nVidia 430
> chipset...is that enough info?
>
Could you just attach the output of dmesg?
> security isnt about SELinux.
Well, seems I didn't completely get the original person's point of view then.
I thought that it was more end-computer oriented. Then I think SELinux could
be part of its security.
Ondrej Vadinsky
--
Don`t it always seem to go
That you don`t know what you`ve got
Output of lsmod | grep cdrom
cdrom 36354 1 sr_mod
As for the controller, i am not sure...my mothermoard uses the nVidia 430
chipset...is that enough info?
Look the message of the cd-info when i insert the "Gentoo netinstall" CD:
CD location : /dev/cdrom
CD driver name: GNU/Li
On 02/01/2010 07:25 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Eh. I cannot keep on switching the User Agent every time I start
firefox. So about:config :D ;)
don't open after a while reporting that firefox is identifying as other
version/name [1]
[1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18033
[/end joke]
-
If you go to wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox there is a link to
the forum with the caption firebrand, go to the third page of the
forum and copy the updated script and run it in sudo(when firefox is
not running). This will rebrand your firefox completely to firefox.
Best regards
Nicklas W Bju
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:51 +0200, Thanos Zygouris wrote:
> Thanks for replying...
> It's a IDE drive:
> 1) wodim --devices
> 0 dev='/dev/scd0'rwrw-- : 'TSSTcorp' 'CD/DVDW SH-S182D'
>
> 2) dmesg | grep sr0
> sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 48x/48x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
>
> And i did
Thanks for replying...
It's a IDE drive:
1) wodim --devices
0 dev='/dev/scd0'rwrw-- : 'TSSTcorp' 'CD/DVDW SH-S182D'
2) dmesg | grep sr0
sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 48x/48x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
And i did try to disable hal...nothing changes...
hi.
preload and prelink are NOT the same thing.
preload is a daemon that scan what file you load into memory the most
(in learning mode). and later (in operating mode), it prefetches them. I
can't say if there is a difference as it's been a long time I use it. a
slight improvement may be at the st
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:08:33 +0800
Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 01/02/2010, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> >> 2010/1/31, f...@kokkinizita.net :
> >> > that means that cdrkit has been renamed to cdrtools ? :-)
> >>
> >> Of course, it
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:26 +0200, Thanos Zygouris wrote:
> Hi gyus,
> i got a problem...(do not know how/when did it started though).
> I cannot mount CD roms...(i do not speak about automounting)
> Here is what "dmesg" tells:
>
> sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code
> sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Result:
Hi gyus,
i got a problem...(do not know how/when did it started though).
I cannot mount CD roms...(i do not speak about automounting)
Here is what "dmesg" tells:
sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code
sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08
sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : 0x4 [curren
Hello, list!
Do this programs makes system faster? Maybe anyone use this program. II
can`t find article in archlinux wiki about them, only in gentoo wiki(or
handbook) - so i can`t find an answer to "is this good for Archlinux".
PS Plz share /etc/prelink.conf
"Armando M. Baratti" wrote:
> Strange, I have had the opposite experience.
> Trying to burn some CDs with cdrkit (on CentOS) give some problem with
> not being able to generate Joliet system and I have had trouble with
> utf-8 too.
>
> First I thought I was making some stupid mistake, but chang
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:36 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:37:54AM +1100, James Rayner wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:34 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:00:04PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > >
> > > > You should try the testi
98 matches
Mail list logo
