Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] devtools and db-scripts plans

2010-02-05 Thread Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
- allow db-move to handle multiple packages (or add a script to help moving from community-testing) We should kill these testing2whatever scripts and unify it completely in db-move (including the testing2x case where the right repository is automatically determined). Short-term it w

Re: [arch-general] pacman message: "too much happens::" ...

2010-02-05 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 18:07, clemens fischer wrote: > Sorry.  It's an fcrontab entry: > >  { pacman --noprogressbar -Sy && pacman --noprogressbar -Qu || :; } 2>&1 > > > clemens > > Try it with --debug for more info?

Re: [arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Friday 05 February 2010 18:48:15 David C. Rankin wrote: > Thanks Shridhar, > > I know how to do that. Nepomuk has been working fine in the past > versions > of 4.3.4, but now it seems that virtuoso isn't behaving properly. Are you > seeing this problem as well? I haven't upgraded yet.

Re: [arch-general] Viewing Actual Kernel Release Version

2010-02-05 Thread Ionut Biru
On 02/06/2010 01:30 AM, Carlos Williams wrote: I noticed today when doing a system upgrade via Pacman, it wanted to upgrade my kernel and install 'kernel26-2.6.32.7-1' however I wanted to know how this version differs from my current version kernel. When I run 'uname -r' command, I just get "2.6.

[arch-general] Viewing Actual Kernel Release Version

2010-02-05 Thread Carlos Williams
I noticed today when doing a system upgrade via Pacman, it wanted to upgrade my kernel and install 'kernel26-2.6.32.7-1' however I wanted to know how this version differs from my current version kernel. When I run 'uname -r' command, I just get "2.6.32-ARCH". Can someone please tell me how I can f

Re: [arch-general] pacman message: "too much happens::" ...

2010-02-05 Thread clemens fischer
Dan McGee wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, clemens fischer wrote: > >> I'm updating the pacman database about once a day.  For the last few >> days I always get this message: >> >>  "too much happens:: Synchronizing package databases..." >> >> but everything works fine.  I checked usr/bin/

Re: [arch-general] pacman message: "too much happens::" ...

2010-02-05 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, clemens fischer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm updating the pacman database about once a day.  For the last few > days I always get this message: > >  "too much happens:: Synchronizing package databases..." > > but everything works fine.  I checked usr/bin/pacman, > /usr/lib/

Re: [arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Brendan Long wrote: > On 02/05/2010 12:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: >> >> On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote: >>> >>> So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The >>> xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because

[arch-general] pacman message: "too much happens::" ...

2010-02-05 Thread clemens fischer
Hi, I'm updating the pacman database about once a day. For the last few days I always get this message: "too much happens:: Synchronizing package databases..." but everything works fine. I checked usr/bin/pacman, /usr/lib/libalpm.so.4 and usr/sbin/fcron using strings(1) for the text "much",

[arch-general] Dark Red & Gold KDE4 Theme - brighten your desktop for a bit (DR - you might even like it :-)

2010-02-05 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, I never thought red and gold would work on a kde4 desktop, but I think it looks great. While I figure out how to package them and where to put them, I could use some feedback on whether they need any more work. Below are links to the RedGold theme, a background to go with it, and an emer

Re: [arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Brendan Long
On 02/05/2010 12:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote: So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because firefox-branded (from the AUR) depends on an old version, but firefox

Re: [arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Ionut Biru
On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote: So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because firefox-branded (from the AUR) depends on an old version, but firefox-branded won't update because it needs a ne

[arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Brendan Long
So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because firefox-branded (from the AUR) depends on an old version, but firefox-branded won't update because it needs a newer version of xulrunner. I got it to work by

Re: [arch-general] [Testing] Kontact 4.3.98-1: No plugins shown

2010-02-05 Thread Bram Schoenmakers
2010/2/5 Erwin Van de Velde : Hi, > Hi, > > Kontact does not show any of its plugins (kmail, korganizer, ...). It starts > empty and if started from CLI, it prints: You could try to run kbuildsycoca4 --noincremental as your regular user. Kind regards, -- Bram Schoenmakers What is mind? No ma

Re: [arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
On 5 February 2010 15:41, ludovic coues wrote: > Maybe virtuoso have trouble with the database. I've see a post on this mail > list or dev-archlinux where they are talking about some change in the > database format. I think this is the mail you're talking about: http://www.mail-archive.com/arch-d

Re: [arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread ludovic coues
2010/2/5 David C. Rankin > On 02/05/2010 03:00 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > On Friday 05 February 2010 14:08:11 David C. Rankin wrote: > >> Looking at the processes, it is 'virtuoso -t' that is to blame. Can > anyone > >> else confirm this behavior ... and .. does anyone know of a wor

Re: [arch-general] A bug in compiz-core

2010-02-05 Thread Ionut Biru
On 02/05/2010 04:55 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: Hi, I was trying to configure compiz and kde, when I ran fusion-icon on the terminal, it told me that /usr/lib/compiz/libpng.so.14 could not be loaded as required by compiz. But I found /usr/lib/compiz/libpng.so and symlinked to libpng.so.14 th

[arch-general] A bug in compiz-core

2010-02-05 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
Hi, I was trying to configure compiz and kde, when I ran fusion-icon on the terminal, it told me that /usr/lib/compiz/libpng.so.14 could not be loaded as required by compiz. But I found /usr/lib/compiz/libpng.so and symlinked to libpng.so.14 that fixed the problem. But is this a bug to be

Re: [arch-general] Recent update to php-apache breaks LAMP stack.

2010-02-05 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/05/2010 05:20 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > On 02/04/2010 11:43 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> Nilesh Govindarajan writes: >>> On 02/02/2010 04:14 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Hi, I'd recently updated php, mysql, and php-apache packages to following versions: php 5.3

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-05 Thread Matěj Týč
On 4 February 2010 22:56, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:52:34 Matěj Týč wrote: >> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not >> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two >> weeks old. > But giovanni said that yafray

Re: [arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/05/2010 03:00 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Friday 05 February 2010 14:08:11 David C. Rankin wrote: >> Looking at the processes, it is 'virtuoso -t' that is to blame. Can >> anyone >> else confirm this behavior ... and .. does anyone know of a workaround? > > Disble nepomuk? >

Re: [arch-general] Mounting tmpfs on /dev. Why?

2010-02-05 Thread ludovic coues
2010/2/4 Arvid Picciani > On 02/04/2010 02:33 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > I'd like you to find any modern Linux distribution that doesn't do it >> this way. Good luck with that. >> > > > HereticLinux :P > isn't Heretic an adjective meaning '20 years old' ? -- Cordialement, Coues Ludovic 06

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 05/02/2010, Giovanni Scafora wrote: >> 2010/2/4, Matěj Týč : >>> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not >>>  exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two >>>  weeks old. >> >> I know, y

Re: [arch-general] Recent update to php-apache breaks LAMP stack.

2010-02-05 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On 02/04/2010 11:43 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Nilesh Govindarajan writes: On 02/02/2010 04:14 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: Hi, I'd recently updated php, mysql, and php-apache packages to following versions: php 5.3.1-4 mysql 5.1.43-1 php-apache 5.3.1-4 After update my existing webapps started sho

[arch-general] [Testing] Kontact 4.3.98-1: No plugins shown

2010-02-05 Thread Erwin Van de Velde
Hi, Kontact does not show any of its plugins (kmail, korganizer, ...). It starts empty and if started from CLI, it prints: $ kontact kontact(10740)/kdecore (KSycoca) KSycocaPrivate::openDatabase: Trying to open ksycoca from "/var/tmp/kdecache-evdvelde/ksycoca4" kontact(10740)/kdecore (trader) K

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-05 Thread Ray Rashif
On 05/02/2010, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2010/2/4, Matěj Týč : >> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not >> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two >> weeks old. > > I know, yafaray is actively developed, but we have yafray in extra >

Re: [arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Friday 05 February 2010 14:08:11 David C. Rankin wrote: > Looking at the processes, it is 'virtuoso -t' that is to blame. Can > anyone > else confirm this behavior ... and .. does anyone know of a workaround? Disble nepomuk? -- Regards Shridhar

[arch-general] kde44beta - 'virtuoso -t' grabbing ~80% of the CPU every few minutes

2010-02-05 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, After the kde44beta install, I first notices increased fan noise every 10 minutes or so that lasts for about 4-5 minutes, then things would go back to normal. At first I just thought it was strigi catching up or so, but after a full day the CPU was still getting pegged. Loo