Wow did all of you post simultaneously ;)
On 24.02.2010 00:11, Michishige Kaito wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick apt-cache sear
On Tue 23 Feb 2010 23:11 +, Michishige Kaito wrote:
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick apt-cache se
On Feb 23, 2010, at 18:11, Michishige Kaito
wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers
for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-
dev. A
quick apt-cac
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:11:12PM +, Michishige Kaito wrote:
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick a
On 02/24/2010 01:11 AM, Michishige Kaito wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick apt-cache search pac
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Michishige Kaito
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick a
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick apt-cache search package | grep dev would yield the right package.
Now
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 23:47 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/23, Ng Oon-Ee :
> > Hi, just ran -Syu and got boost 1.42.0 but schroot in [community] is not
> > yet updated and throws a libboost error. Just a heads-up in case it
> > didn't turn up on the mentioned (off-ML) list.
>
> Rebuild
2010/2/23, Ng Oon-Ee :
> Hi, just ran -Syu and got boost 1.42.0 but schroot in [community] is not
> yet updated and throws a libboost error. Just a heads-up in case it
> didn't turn up on the mentioned (off-ML) list.
Rebuild is not completed yet for community repo.
Only extra is completed now.
P
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:08 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/23, Allan McRae :
> > That looks a fairly small rebuild. Put boost in [testing] and I will start
> > building.
>
> Thanks Allan.
> I'm building boost 1.42.0, and I put it in testing soon.
>
Hi, just ran -Syu and got boost 1.42.
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:49:42PM +0100, Alex wrote:
> On 23.02.2010 00:04, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> >One of my next projects will require touchscreens for
> >a 'kiosk' type of application, and I'm still trying
> >to find the right hardware. Any suggestions will be
> >much appreciated (if t
Hi!
> One of my next projects will require touchscreens for
> a 'kiosk' type of application, and I'm still trying
> to find the right hardware. Any suggestions will be
> much appreciated (if they work with Arch of course).
I did a sort of kiosk application last year with an LG 1730 sf, which work
On 23.02.2010 00:04, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Hello all,
Over the past 3 months I've installed Arch on five
different machines: an IBM R51, a Fujitsu-Siemens
W360, my home machine which has no pedigree, an
EEE-1000H and an today an EEE-904HA.
Apart from one major panic related to the libpng1
On 02/23/2010 09:58 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 02/23/2010 06:12 PM, Rene Rasmussen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:29:27 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 02/23/2010 08:21 AM, Peter Wu wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 21:12:36 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
There's no such command.
should be at
On 02/23/2010 06:12 PM, Rene Rasmussen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:29:27 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 02/23/2010 08:21 AM, Peter Wu wrote:
On Monday 22 February 2010 21:12:36 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
There's no such command.
should be at /usr/bin/vbox_build_module.
run it under
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:29:27 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 02/23/2010 08:21 AM, Peter Wu wrote:
> > On Monday 22 February 2010 21:12:36 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> There's no such command.
> >>>
> >>> should be at /usr/bin/vbox_build_module.
> >>>
> >>> run it under root.
> >>
> >>
18 matches
Mail list logo
