Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-26 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Michishige Kaito wrote: > Actually, dark themes can be easy on the eyes, I've found. But they gotta > be > well done, cos otherrwise they just look weird. > > 2010/2/27 Nilesh Govindarajan > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Sachiel wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Fe

Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-26 Thread Michishige Kaito
Actually, dark themes can be easy on the eyes, I've found. But they gotta be well done, cos otherrwise they just look weird. 2010/2/27 Nilesh Govindarajan > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Sachiel wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David C. Rankin > > wrote: > > > Listmates, > > >

Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-26 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Sachiel wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David C. Rankin > wrote: > > Listmates, > > > >I stumbled across some absolutely killer gtk-2.0 & metacity themes > that caught > > my eye. If you use gnome, Xfce, etc.., give them a try and I guarantee >

Re: [arch-general] Gnome/Gtk-2.0 BLING! (list of surprisingly cool themes)

2010-02-26 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > >        I stumbled across some absolutely killer gtk-2.0 & metacity themes > that caught > my eye. If you use gnome, Xfce, etc.., give them a try and I guarantee you, > you Are all of them black-ish?

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: FS#17503: [unzip] zsh completion missing for unzip patches

2010-02-26 Thread Thayer Williams
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Xavier Chantry wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Thayer Williams wrote: >> >> Bumping this for feedback.  7z correctly unzips localized win32 zip >> files, but bsdtar/unzip cannot.  Is that good enough to remove the >> conflicting win32 patches from unzip

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/26/2010 01:29 PM, christopher floess wrote: On 02/26/2010 09:18 PM, Gary Wright wrote: On 02/26/2010 08:41 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/26/2010 12:43 PM, christopher floess wrote: Maybe it's just my untrained eye, but things don't seem to be out of the ordinary here. /lib didn't show anything 32-bit. At this point, if I could be fairly certain that a reinstall would work, I'd try that. I'm just afraid that it won't produc

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: FS#17503: [unzip] zsh completion missing for unzip patches

2010-02-26 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Thayer Williams wrote: > > Bumping this for feedback.  7z correctly unzips localized win32 zip > files, but bsdtar/unzip cannot.  Is that good enough to remove the > conflicting win32 patches from unzip? > Links to feature request for adding support to bsdtar / un

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread christopher floess
On 02/26/2010 09:18 PM, Gary Wright wrote: On 02/26/2010 08:41 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it something like "pacman -R --all !base" would be

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Gary Wright
On 02/26/2010 08:41 AM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it something like "pacman -R --all !base" would be nice -- Chris pacman -R $(pacman -Qq | grep

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread christopher floess
On 02/26/2010 01:00 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: I'm out of ideas too, because they still segfault. Crap. I guess I could reinstall the system, but doesn't seem like the way to go here. I have X working with wmii. I just have nasty looking window decorations and random productivity Applicatio

[arch-general] svn / kwallet integration broken

2010-02-26 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Not sure if the cause is recent upgrades to svn, or the recent upgrade to the KDE 4.4 beta, but svn integration with kwallet as a password store doesn't seem to be working anymore. Anyone else seeing this and/or have any idea what's up? Thanks, DR

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
> Is there a way to de-install everything that's NOT in base? I looked around > for this, and will I could certainly create a command line chain for it > something like "pacman -R --all !base"  would be nice > > -- Chris > pacman -R $(pacman -Qq | grep -v "$(pacman -Qqg base)") Though I havn't te

Re: [arch-general] Postfix Package Upgrade

2010-02-26 Thread Carlos Williams
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: > My bad, I just checked this mirror (in my country) > ftp://ftp.inescn.pt/pub/net/mail/postfix/index.html for the downloads > available but it seems this mirror is not up to date. Paul just released the Postfix 2.7.0-1 package in 'Testing' for

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Leandro Inacio
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:03, Allan McRae wrote: > On 26/02/10 22:31, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 26.02.2010 10:28, schrieb Allan McRae: >> >>> HI, >>> >>> I mentioned this several months ago and got no response so I will post >>> again. If there are no objections in 48 hours, the rebuilds wi

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.02.2010 14:01, schrieb Heiko Baums: > Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:36 +0100 > schrieb Thomas Bächler : > >> We don't need rp-pppoe in base (IMO not even in core, but others >> disagree). > > I disagree because configuring a pppoe client with pure ppp is far too > complicated. For people who ha

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:36 +0100 schrieb Thomas Bächler : > We don't need rp-pppoe in base (IMO not even in core, but others > disagree). I disagree because configuring a pppoe client with pure ppp is far too complicated. For people who haven't got a router and establish their DSL connections d

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:28:46 +0100 schrieb Thomas Bächler : > bsdtar can be used for that purpose. Didn't know that. Thanks for the info. Greetings, Heiko

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.02.2010 13:23, schrieb Heiko Baums: > cpio is probably not necessarily needed by the average user, but as far > as I know it's needed to uncompress or read the content of the initrd > (e.g. xzcat kernel26.img | cpio -t), which sometimes can be necessary > for debugging purposes. So I'm not su

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Allan McRae
On 26/02/10 22:23, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:28:24 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae: I mentioned this several months ago and got no response so I will post again. If there are no objections in 48 hours, the rebuilds will start hitting [testing]. FS#12890 suggests cleaning some of the

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:23:16 +0100 schrieb Heiko Baums : > And cryptsetup definitely needs to stay in [core] and in the base > group because this is needed for encrypting hard disks, which is > supported by AIF anyway. And cryptsetup is needed at boot time and > during the installation from the Li

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Clean up the base group

2010-02-26 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:28:24 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae : > I mentioned this several months ago and got no response so I will > post again. If there are no objections in 48 hours, the rebuilds > will start hitting [testing]. > > FS#12890 suggests cleaning some of the packages from the base group.

Re: [arch-general] ld-2.11.1.so and segfaults

2010-02-26 Thread Damjan Georgievski
> I'm out of ideas too, because they still segfault. Crap. > > I guess I could reinstall the system, but doesn't seem like the way to go > here. I have X working with wmii. I just have nasty looking window > decorations and random productivity Applications that don't work. > > Is there a way to de-