Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:32:20 -0600
schrieb "David C. Rankin" :
> This is currently the state at opensuse and KDE and is a primary
> reason for all the new Arch users and all the new users of xfce,
> fluxbox and gnome.
There also may be some other reasons for all the new Arch users. ;-)
> Arch ha
On 03/13/2010 04:08 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
>> On 03/13/2010 01:57 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>> The yum-createrepo package seems not to be the same as the
>>> createrepo package that you normally see. Specifically executing
>>> the yum-createrepo script with the help option discloses:
>
Xavier Chantry wrote:
The tiny size of the reopen textbox does not give a lot of freedom for
justifications either.
I think this is completely missing the point though. I don't
understand why Dan is the only developer who sees that it sometimes
makes sense to provide additional information on clo
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 04:32:20PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> This is currently the state at opensuse and KDE and is a primary reason for
> all
> the new Arch users and all the new users of xfce, fluxbox and gnome.
>
> We are all in this together. One of the things that makes a distro great
On 03/13/2010 04:38 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 14/03/2010 12:10 πμ, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> I did miss it, must have been tired. See my thread "Something
>> really wrong with
>> createrepo.." Looks like you pulled the development version into the
>> AUR package
>> which I can't get to
On 14/03/2010 12:10 πμ, David C. Rankin wrote:
I did miss it, must have been tired. See my thread "Something really
wrong with
createrepo.." Looks like you pulled the development version into the AUR package
which I can't get to work. The stable version (4.11) works just fine, but has a
On 03/12/2010 06:20 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:39:05 +1000
> schrieb Allan McRae :
>
>> I really do not see the need.
>>
>> If a bug is wrongly closed -> request a reopen.
>> If you just want to confirm a bug has been fixed, there is no need...
>> we already closed the bug re
On 03/13/2010 07:44 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 13/03/2010 11:27 πμ, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> I don't know how I missed the repoview in AUR, I had to get about
>> 6 packages
>> from AUR to build 'yum-createrepo' and I could have sworn I checked for
>> repoview, but I guess I didn't.
>
>
> On 03/13/2010 01:57 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > The yum-createrepo package seems not to be the same as the
> > createrepo package that you normally see. Specifically executing
> > the yum-createrepo script with the help option discloses:
> >
It's better if these things are docume
On 03/13/2010 01:57 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The yum-createrepo package seems not to be the same as the createrepo
> package
> that you normally see. Specifically executing the yum-createrepo script with
> the
> help option discloses:
>
> [13:35 nirvana:/home/backup/rpms] #
Guys,
The yum-createrepo package seems not to be the same as the createrepo
package
that you normally see. Specifically executing the yum-createrepo script with the
help option discloses:
[13:35 nirvana:/home/backup/rpms] # createrepo --help
Usage: genpkgmetadata.py [options]
Options:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> I do not see all reopen requests, but the need to "beg" seems overstated...
> I do know that it is much, much easier to get a bug reopened if the request
> is clear and well justified. A large portion of reopen requests provide no
> informa
On 13/03/10 22:55, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:58:24 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
Yes, there are sometimes situations where I wanted to add a more or
less important comment to a bug reports but it was just closed.
In the other hand I see the problems of never ending discussions
On 13/03/2010 11:27 πμ, David C. Rankin wrote:
I don't know how I missed the repoview in AUR, I had to get about 6
packages
from AUR to build 'yum-createrepo' and I could have sworn I checked for
repoview, but I guess I didn't.
Did you not receive my reply [1]? I clearly state that I u
By default HAL adds the flush flag when USB devices are mounted... I
think which is what making WRITEs slow.
I want that HAL shouldn't add the flush flag. How to ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site & Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:58:24 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
> Yes, there are sometimes situations where I wanted to add a more or
> less important comment to a bug reports but it was just closed.
>
> In the other hand I see the problems of never ending discussions and
> flame wars.
In other bug
On 03/12/2010 03:06 PM, Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> You should use makepkg for it unless you are doing it in virtualenv.
>
> There already is a PKGBUILD for repoview in aur.
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35377
>
Thanks Everyone,
I don't know how I missed the repoview in AUR, I
17 matches
Mail list logo
