Am Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:35:55 +0530
schrieb Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com:
On 03/25/2010 02:29 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:34:40 +0530
schrieb Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com:
I installed kernel26-lts.
It will boot properly upto Udev then screen will
On 25 March 2010 00:36, Damien Churchill dam...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 March 2010 23:52, Linas linas...@ymail.com wrote:
Damien Churchill wrote:
I've got a rather confusing issue with man. Whenever I try and view a
man page I just end up with a blank screen.
Appearance of sites in Chromium is very dirty, though I didn't change
the default font settings.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
On 03/25/2010 01:18 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:35:55 +0530
schrieb Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com:
On 03/25/2010 02:29 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Am Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:34:40 +0530
schrieb Nilesh Govindarajanli...@itech7.com:
I installed kernel26-lts.
It will boot
On 03/25/2010 05:06 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Appearance of sites in Chromium is very dirty, though I didn't change
the default font settings.
Oops, it seems its related to the site. Sorry ignore this thread.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
Good day everyone,
I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab:
none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such
thing, all the information I could get on the internet is that shm is
for POSIX shared memory
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:53 +0900, Juan Diego wrote:
Good day everyone,
I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab:
none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such
thing, all the information I
Am 25.03.2010 16:53, schrieb Juan Diego:
Good day everyone,
I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab:
none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such
thing, all the information I could get on
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 15:18, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 14:20, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not super thrilled about this regression. Either way, I think we
should probably add an option to the scripts to use a designated file
as the target
Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Xavier Chantry:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
This is definitely NOT SAFE!
If you don't have /dev/shm, POSIX shared memory will use the same tmpfs
filesystem as /dev, which is currently limited to 10MB - POSIX shared
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Upstream big update.
Local changelog:
- Removed the multibyte locale speed-up patch (and all the patches to fix
the issues it created...) as it is now included upstream.
- Removed the other patches as it appears they
I wanted to remove them because I was cleaning my fstab of old entries
that I dont use anymore, so I found those two in the middle of the
way, I guess they will have to stay there
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Xavier
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 15:18, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 14:20, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not super thrilled about this regression. Either way, I think we
should
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 01:47 +0900, Juan Diego wrote:
I wanted to remove them because I was cleaning my fstab of old entries
that I dont use anymore, so I found those two in the middle of the
way, I guess they will have to stay there
Bottom-posting, please...
And yes, I've wanted to remove
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version: 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version
numbers? The linked sourceforge page still lists 8.11 as the
2010/3/25 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version: 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version
numbers? The linked
Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version: 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version
numbers? The linked
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:07 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version: 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm assuming this is
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Giovanni Scafora
giova...@archlinux.org wrote:
Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version : 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:31 +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Giovanni Scafora
giova...@archlinux.org wrote:
Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
Repository : extra
Name : gsfonts
Version: 1.0.7pre44-1
Installed : 8.11-5
20 matches
Mail list logo
