On Thu, April 8, 2010 11:09 pm, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 23:05, David Rosenstrauch
> wrote:
>> * Bizarrely enough, *some* of the keys on the keyboard actually work
>> (such
>> as / * - + on the numeric keypad).
>>
>> * I'm getting a load of errors in the slim.log file that loo
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 23:05, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> * Bizarrely enough, *some* of the keys on the keyboard actually work (such
> as / * - + on the numeric keypad).
>
> * I'm getting a load of errors in the slim.log file that look like this:
> expected keysym, got XF86_Switch_VT_1 line 8 of x
On Thu, April 8, 2010 9:51 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> So WTF?!?!?!? Hal sees the keyboard. And xev running inside the x
> session sees the keyboard. SO WHY ON EARTH IS MY KEYBOARD STILL DEAD IN
> MY X SESSIONS?!?!? AHH
Wee hee! It gets weirder!
* Bizarrely enough, *
On Wed, April 7, 2010 2:11 pm, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, David Rosenstrauch
> wrote:
>>
>> Anybody have any ideas on this? GUI is completely unusable on the
>> server
>> until I solve this! :-(
>>
>> I really have zero idea what's going on. And it's a difficult thi
On 09/04/10 01:45, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:42:29 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
On 09/04/10 01:20, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:37:13 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
wrote:
The move is in progress...please don't touch anything while we are
still
on it. :-)
So,
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:42:29 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
wrote:
> On 09/04/10 01:20, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:37:13 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
>> wrote:
>>> The move is in progress...please don't touch anything while we are
still
>>> on it. :-)
>>
>> So, we are done. Mirrors should
On 09/04/10 01:20, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:37:13 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
wrote:
The move is in progress...please don't touch anything while we are still
on it. :-)
So, we are done. Mirrors should be back in sync some day.
Have the packages in [xorg18] been moved into [extr
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:42:05PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 08.04.2010 15:38, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:41:12 +0200, Thomas Bächler
> > wrote:
> >> Thanks to a hint from Pierre, I fixed it:
> >> # update-ca-certificates --fresh
> >> The hashes in /etc/ssl/certs a
On 04/08/10 07:21, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
My take on it is that while it's always a good idea to be using a
current install medium, with Arch it only matters that your system is
able to become current via update. The release of a new install set in
itself should never be a reason to reinst
It would appear that on Apr 8, Lukáš Jirkovský did say:
> Hi David,
> > It doesn't matter whether you use the
> > latest install set or the one from 3 'releases' back, after the first
> > update,
> > you will have the exact same, current Arch Linux we all have. It is the
> > smartest
> > way to
10 matches
Mail list logo
