Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] xorg-server 1.8 repository

2010-04-17 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jan de Groot wrote: > Things todo before this merges to extra: > - Fix xf86-video-siliconmotion, xf86-video-unichrome, xf86-video-nouveau I'm curious as to what this means. In particular, what's broken with nouveau? Does it not compile, or not work properly? And is

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread Allan McRae
On 18/04/10 11:44, David C. Rankin wrote: On 04/17/2010 06:49 PM, Byron Clark wrote: Thanks Byron, The issue ended up being a new libssl version. Thankfully there was a libssl-compatibility package in AUR that provided libssl.so.0.9.8. That's one way to fix it. The other way is to reb

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread Byron Clark
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:44:09PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 04/17/2010 06:49 PM, Byron Clark wrote: > >> > Thanks Byron, > >> > > >> > The issue ended up being a new libssl version. Thankfully there was a > >> > libssl-compatibility package in AUR that provided libssl.so.0.9.8. > > That

Re: [arch-general] did my 4/10/10:pacman -Syu: destabilized e17's run command dialog??

2010-04-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/16/2010 04:12 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > Actually, I'm not sure if this is thanks to E17 itself or specific to > Arch... And it's no big deal anyway because: > A) e17 is "under heavy development", (And I know that means it's unstable) > B) I've already got a workaround that wor

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/17/2010 08:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 04/17/2010 06:49 PM, Byron Clark wrote: Thanks Byron, > I guess one way would just be to rebuild everything and see if it fixes it, > but > there has to be some debugging tool that can ID who calls what. What say the > experts? > > >

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/17/2010 06:49 PM, Byron Clark wrote: >> > Thanks Byron, >> > >> >The issue ended up being a new libssl version. Thankfully there was a >> > libssl-compatibility package in AUR that provided libssl.so.0.9.8. > That's one way to fix it. The other way is to rebuild rpm or whichever > of it

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread Byron Clark
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 05:59:33PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 04/17/2010 02:09 PM, Byron Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:02:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > >> Traceback (most recent call last): > >> File "/usr/share/createrepo/genpkgmetadata.py", line 26, in > >> imp

Re: [arch-general] HAL dependencies

2010-04-17 Thread Rob Bean
Ok. I'm just going to rebuild them and see what happens. :) On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 18.04.2010 01:22, schrieb Rob Bean: > > It looks like there are only 3: gnome-vfs, gstreamer0.10-good-plugins, > and > > vlc. I can use ABS to rebuild these without HAL, but

Re: [arch-general] HAL dependencies

2010-04-17 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 18.04.2010 01:22, schrieb Rob Bean: > It looks like there are only 3: gnome-vfs, gstreamer0.10-good-plugins, and > vlc. I can use ABS to rebuild these without HAL, but I'm concerned that > these packages may actually need it. From short discussions with Jan, I determined that the HAL dependenc

[arch-general] HAL dependencies

2010-04-17 Thread Rob Bean
I've recently started using Xorg 1.8 from the [xorg18] repo to finally be able to get rid of HAL. Xorg is working fine, but I want to remove the remaining packages that depend on HAL. It looks like there are only 3: gnome-vfs, gstreamer0.10-good-plugins, and vlc. I can use ABS to rebuild these w

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/17/2010 02:09 PM, Byron Clark wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:02:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/share/createrepo/genpkgmetadata.py", line 26, in >> import rpm >> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rpm/__init__.py", line

Re: [arch-general] libkrb5.so.25 error - was (Re: ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?)

2010-04-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/17/2010 01:14 PM, dave reisner wrote: > Symlinking so's is unadvisable as it's bound to get you in trouble sooner or > later -- clearly in your case it's sooner. > > The only reason I can think of to install a compatibility package is one of > two reasons: > > 1) The package is a closed so

Re: [arch-general] ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?

2010-04-17 Thread Byron Clark
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:02:55AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/createrepo/genpkgmetadata.py", line 26, in > import rpm > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rpm/__init__.py", line 7, in > from _rpm import * > ImportError: li

Re: [arch-general] libkrb5.so.25 error - was (Re: ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?)

2010-04-17 Thread dave reisner
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:05 PM, David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: >Thank you for your help. I solved the libssl issue by installing > libssl-compatibility from AUR. However -- that brought to light another > problem > brought on by recent updates that moved libssl.s

[arch-general] libkrb5.so.25 error - was (Re: ImportError: libssl.so.0.9.8: -- do I just rebuild the AUR packages?)

2010-04-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 04/15/2010 11:26 AM, dave reisner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, David C. Rankin < > drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> After the latest openssl updates, the AUR packages for createrepo and >> repoview >> are failing. >> >> > Same as any other so-name bump. I

Re: [arch-general] IceCat and Novell Moonlight pre

2010-04-17 Thread Figue
El 17/04/10 17:54, f. gr. escribió: Hi all, I'm trying to install Novell Moonlight plugin 3.0 preview 6 . But I got this message: «GNU IceCat could not install the file at http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/downloads/2.99.0.6/novell-moonlight-2.99

[arch-general] IceCat and Novell Moonlight pre

2010-04-17 Thread f. gr.
Hi all, I'm trying to install Novell Moonlight plugin 3.0 preview 6 . But I got this message: «GNU IceCat could not install the file at http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/downloads/2.99.0.6/novell-moonlight-2.99.0.6-x86_64.xpi because: Signing cou

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gcc-4.5 toolchain rebuild

2010-04-17 Thread Dan McGee
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >> Thanks for your reply Allan. >> >> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >>> On 17/04/10 00:03, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: Just out of curiosity, what is the

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] gcc-4.5 toolchain rebuild

2010-04-17 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > Thanks for your reply Allan. > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 17/04/10 00:03, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: >>> >>> Just out of curiosity, what is the plan regarding this issue (quoted >>> from the gcc changelog): >