Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

2010-05-08 Thread Allan McRae
On 08/05/10 23:11, Matěj Týč wrote: What's wrong with that pacmatic functionality that shomehow tries to solve this, since it is not implemented in pacman? pacmantic's functionality is Arch specific while pacman is not. Message 29 in a thread that had the initial question answered in post #2

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD contributor, maintainer, author...

2010-05-08 Thread Allan McRae
On 09/05/10 16:08, vlad wrote: On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:09:46AM +0300, Ionut Biru wrote: On 05/09/2010 01:02 AM, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: Hello Arch, i'm doing (for fun) a PKGBUILD parser in javascript, and now as i was testing it with random PKGBUILD files from AUR, i noticed that there

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD contributor, maintainer, author...

2010-05-08 Thread vlad
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:09:46AM +0300, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 05/09/2010 01:02 AM, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: > >Hello Arch, > > > >i'm doing (for fun) a PKGBUILD parser in javascript, and now as i was > >testing it with random PKGBUILD files from AUR, i noticed that there > >is more than one w

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD contributor, maintainer, author...

2010-05-08 Thread Calvin McAnarney
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote: > Hello Arch, > > i'm doing (for fun) a PKGBUILD parser in javascript, and now as i was > testing it with random PKGBUILD files from AUR, i noticed that there > is more than one way people use to define authors... > (/usr/share/PK

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD contributor, maintainer, author...

2010-05-08 Thread Ionut Biru
On 05/09/2010 01:02 AM, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: Hello Arch, i'm doing (for fun) a PKGBUILD parser in javascript, and now as i was testing it with random PKGBUILD files from AUR, i noticed that there is more than one way people use to define authors... (/usr/share/PKGBUILD.proto shows only "C

[arch-general] PKGBUILD contributor, maintainer, author...

2010-05-08 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt
Hello Arch, i'm doing (for fun) a PKGBUILD parser in javascript, and now as i was testing it with random PKGBUILD files from AUR, i noticed that there is more than one way people use to define authors... (/usr/share/PKGBUILD.proto shows only "Contributor") till now i've found: - Contributor - Mai

[arch-general] audacious segfaults; can debug because of dependencies

2010-05-08 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Hello list, I tried audacious for a change this morning, but it segfaulted on visualisation change[1]. From the look of the backtrace[2], and seeing that glib was updated a couple of days ago, a simple rebuild of the package should be sufficient. I would normally have submitted that to the bug tr

Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

2010-05-08 Thread Jonathan Brown
- Original Message From: Kaiting Chen To: General Discussion about Arch Linux Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 9:50:24 AM Subject: Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim? Hey just want to jump in here and say that I don't think it's a problem in communication. We like Lin

Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

2010-05-08 Thread Kaiting Chen
Hey just want to jump in here and say that I don't think it's a problem in communication. We like Linux and especially Arch because it lets us do what we want, and with power comes responsibility. That responsibility means that one should do a kernel of research before asking for help. In this case

Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

2010-05-08 Thread Matěj Týč
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 11:57 +0200, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > I think the question "Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?" > reveals a problem of communication. Let me explain: > > The news/announce "Vim/GVim 7.2.411 Update" has been published the > 2010-04-18 (when vim/gvim landed in [testi

Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

2010-05-08 Thread Philipp
Excerpts from solsTiCe d'Hiver's message of 2010-05-08 11:57:45 +0200: > I think the question "Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?" > reveals a problem of communication. Let me explain: > > The news/announce "Vim/GVim 7.2.411 Update" has been published the > 2010-04-18 (when vim/gvim land

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule

2010-05-08 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sat, 08 May 2010 11:50:27 +0200 Mathieu Pasquet wrote: > On 07/05/2010 21:53, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > >> > Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for > >> > installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install. > > I second that. I have met someone who just

Re: [arch-general] Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?

2010-05-08 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
I think the question "Err... Why is gvim now conflicting with vim?" reveals a problem of communication. Let me explain: The news/announce "Vim/GVim 7.2.411 Update" has been published the 2010-04-18 (when vim/gvim landed in [testing] ?). So it's over 19 days now. That's the problem. Even on the web

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux release Schedule

2010-05-08 Thread Mathieu Pasquet
On 07/05/2010 21:53, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: >> > Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for >> > installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install. I second that. I have met someone who just can't easily install ArchLinux because his network card is supported o