Good day,
I'm getting an error every time I plug-in my webcam as a result the
corresponding module is not being loaded automatically so I have to
load it by myself. Any one knows a way to fix this?
This is the error:
load-modules.sh: 'usb:v0AC8p305Bd0100dcFFdsc00dp00icFFiscFFipFF' is
not a
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:16 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Good day,
I'm getting an error every time I plug-in my webcam as a result the
corresponding module is not being loaded automatically so I have to
load it by myself. Any one knows a way to fix this?
This is the error:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:49 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Actually it is installed, it is called gspca_zc3xx, if I load it the
webcam works, the thing is it is not being loaded automatically
All modules have device aliases for the devices it supports. Udev just
tries to load a module by
Dear Sven-Hendrik,
I will attend and I'll even be an exhibitor. Meet me at the linux-gamers
booth.
I'll be there with at least another Archer. I'll probably be there all
the time.
great! I'll drop by, probably on Friday.
Looking forward to seeing you :-)
Mathias
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:49 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Actually it is installed, it is called gspca_zc3xx, if I load it the
webcam works, the thing is it is not being loaded automatically
All modules have device
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:55:33 +0900
Juan Diego Tascón juantas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:49 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Actually it is installed, it is called gspca_zc3xx, if I load it
the webcam
2010/6/8 Juan Diego Tascón juantas...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:16 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Good day,
I'm getting an error every time I plug-in my webcam as a result the
corresponding module is not being
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Check every checksum that makepkg supports rather than only md5sums.
Fixes FS#17168.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
---
I am sure there has to be some way to loop through all that duplication,
but the
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Kazuo Teramoto kaz@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Check every checksum that makepkg supports rather than only md5sums.
Fixes FS#17168.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
---
I am sure
On 08/06/10 21:09, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Kazuo Teramotokaz@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Check every checksum that makepkg supports rather than only md5sums.
Fixes FS#17168.
Signed-off-by: Allan
Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one
developer is a good way for your email to get lost.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net
Date: Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Namcap release coming soon
To:
On 8 June 2010 16:58, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one
developer is a good way for your email to get lost.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Guillaume ALAUX guilla...@alaux.net wrote:
On 8 June 2010 16:58, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Forwarding to the public list is your best option; going to one
developer is a good way for
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 18:32 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:43:47 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
wrote:
$startdir will not be removed. The error printed for $startdir usage
was always there so I did not change that. For install files, once 3.4
is released,
On 09/06/10 09:22, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 18:32 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:43:47 +1000, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org
wrote:
$startdir will not be removed. The error printed for $startdir usage
was always there so I did not change that. For install
2010/6/8 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
It is very rare that you should ever need to use $startdir in a PKGBUILD at
all.
I exclude config.h from dwm's PKGBUILD $source array and copy it from
$startdir during build().
It's changed constantly so keeping it summed check is awkward, and I
don't
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 07:58:55PM -0430, Andres P wrote:
2010/6/8 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
It is very rare that you should ever need to use $startdir in a PKGBUILD at
all.
I exclude config.h from dwm's PKGBUILD $source array and copy it from
$startdir during build().
It's
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM, d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 07:58:55PM -0430, Andres P wrote:
2010/6/8 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
It is very rare that you should ever need to use $startdir in a PKGBUILD at
all.
I exclude config.h from dwm's PKGBUILD $source
On 06/08/2010 02:41 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 15:16 +0900, Juan Diego Tascón wrote:
Good day,
I'm getting an error every time I plug-in my webcam as a result the
corresponding module is not being loaded automatically so I have to
load it by myself. Any one knows a way to
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
We can also just do some bash string manipulation and leave sed out of
the picture:
devnum=$(cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/dev)
/bin/mknod /dev/rtc0 c ${devnum/:/ }
Since you're already using a ${foo/bar/baz} bashism, that's a
On 09/06/10 10:38, Andres P wrote:
If makepkg were as fluid as /usr/share/mk in *BSD, this wouldn't be
such an issue. ;)
I have no idea what /usr/share/mk does in this regards so you will need
to explain more.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 09/06/10 10:38, Andres P wrote:
If makepkg were as fluid as /usr/share/mk in *BSD, this wouldn't be
such an issue. ;)
I have no idea what /usr/share/mk does in this regards so you will need to
explain more.
In
22 matches
Mail list logo
