On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
my point of this ramble if
On 22/06/10 15:59, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Dan McGeedpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, C Anthony Risingeranth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony
2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
I'd still like to know how this replaces/conflicts with Arch policy for
'as upstream as possible'. I'm aware that just starting out the answer
may just be we don't know yet, but for me one of the benefits of Arch
is that all packages are close to upstream
Excerpts from Andres P's message of 2010-06-22 01:53:20 +0200:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
He said from git/svn... ie backporting, not contributing.
...?
Once they're in svn they're confined to abs? Besides, it's not like there's
anything
On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested to know your experience of running arch as
server os. running I use distros like debian,CentOS etc. till now I
have been scared of running arch as server.
Please share your experience
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
Even I've
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:16:23 +1000
Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
The point is that the developers around here already patch for
security issues. The only change that I think that a security team
will achieve is to notify me (as a developer) of issues that I have
overlooked on the
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:44:44 -0500
David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Great Job Devs. That brings my total Arch installs to 7,
including my 2 primary servers. Arch has nailed what a distro should
be and that's something worth jealously guarding against the
pressures
Excerpts from Gaurish Sharma's message of Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:10 +0530:
I would be interested to know your experience of running arch as
server os. running I use distros like debian,CentOS etc. till now I
have been scared of running arch as server.
Please share your experience
I'm using
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Sure, like any dev will be going through every possible bug tracker,
repo or ask any possible user to find patches for his app.
Don't be ridiculous. If you write a patch that's not distro specific,
then it's your
Hello. With such an addition, how do I make a given command not
interrupt makepkg? Like command || ignore_errors
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 20:37:45 Evgeny Burmentyev wrote:
Hello. With such an addition, how do I make a given command not
interrupt makepkg? Like command || ignore_errors
|| return 0
?
--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 08:40:18PM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 20:37:45 Evgeny Burmentyev wrote:
Hello. With such an addition, how do I make a given command not
interrupt makepkg? Like command || ignore_errors
|| return 0
?
--
Andrea Scarpino -
No no no no no. || return 0 would exit the function with a success
if the command fails.
You'll want || true
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Evgeny Burmentyev vir.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 08:40:18PM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 20:37:45 Evgeny
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 20:52:59 Jan Steffens wrote:
No no no no no. || return 0 would exit the function with a success
if the command fails.
You'll want || true
right, || true is the real 'Ignore'
--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Sure, like any dev will be going through every possible bug tracker,
repo or ask any possible user to find patches for his app.
Don't be
Has anyone tried Arch Linux on their thinkpad? I just want to know how fast
it is. I don't like the long boot that is found in Ubuntu and many other
distro.
Josef Tupag best humidifiers http://thebesthumidifiers.com
I've been running it on my X61 for a while now. For the most part? I'm way
happy. it's pretty fast, and reliable. However, I have had some issues with
my wireless card but that's been acting up for years without me being able
to figure out what the problem is (in windows and in linux). All in all
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:12:30PM +0300, Josef Tupag wrote:
Has anyone tried Arch Linux on their thinkpad? I just want to know how fast
it is. I don't like the long boot that is found in Ubuntu and many other
distro.
I'm writing this on an R51. It has seen Suse, Fedora and
finally Arch, and
Am Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:12:30 +0300
schrieb Josef Tupag joseftu...@gmail.com:
Has anyone tried Arch Linux on their thinkpad? I just want to know
how fast it is. I don't like the long boot that is found in Ubuntu
and many other distro.
Josef Tupag best humidifiers
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:12:30 +0300, Josef Tupag joseftu...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone tried Arch Linux on their thinkpad? I just want to know how fast
it is. I don't like the long boot that is found in Ubuntu and many other
distro.
Using Arch on my R61 since I bought it, never used anything
Suspend to disk works really well on my X61, maybe it's just the x31 that
had issues.
-Josh
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:12:30 +0300, Josef Tupag joseftu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Has anyone tried Arch Linux on their thinkpad? I
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package file in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
opera-snapshot-10.60-6378.2ah-i686.pkg.tar.gz -
/server/work/archlinux/repo/opera-snapshot-10.60-6378.2ah-i686.pkg.tar.gz
My differences to
Installed Arch on my X500 and it works amazingly well. Pretty fast and
I have a lot of features working that I could never get working with
OpenSUSE.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:51 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
Ok, the beauty of openbsd is that they're running a BIND version that's been
patched to the point of no recognition. They have confidence in their
skills instead of quitting before giving it a shot.
then in my opinion
Excerpts from Thomas Jost's message of Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:31 +0200:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:12:30 +0300, Josef Tupag
joseftu...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone tried Arch Linux on their thinkpad? I just want to know
how fast it is. I don't like the long boot that is found in Ubuntu
and many
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package file in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
opera-snapshot-10.60-6378.2ah-i686.pkg.tar.gz -
On 23/06/10 05:21, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
example: SSH 0-day exploit is released. bang! you crack out your
interim PKGBUILD and crack a beer because your safe right? whoops,
because this is a production machine (from a message a couple hours
ago):
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Sergey
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 05:21, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
example: SSH 0-day exploit is released. bang! you crack out your
interim PKGBUILD and crack a beer because your safe right? whoops,
because this is a production machine (from
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package file
in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
How to install perl plugins in pidgin ?
The default pidgin doesn't have perl support, so I compiled it with
--enable-perl from ABS, but the perl plugin in ~/.purple/plugins with
executable perm doesn't show up in the list.
--
Regards,
Nilesh Govindarajan
Facebook:
On 06/22/10 19:31, Allan McRae wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package
file in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
opera-snapshot-10.60-6378.2ah-i686.pkg.tar.gz -
On 06/22/10 19:49, Allan McRae wrote:
Also, as established earlier in the thread, some of our packages have
patches for security issues that a a couple of years old because
upstream has not made a new release. So the whole probably be fixed by
upstream in less that a week and a point release
On 23/06/10 11:55, Baho Utot wrote:
On 06/22/10 19:31, Allan McRae wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package
file in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:23 AM, John Holbrook johnholbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Installed Arch on my X500 and it works amazingly well. Pretty fast and
I have a lot of features working that I could never get working with
OpenSUSE.
T43P works well too, but is there a model X500 from lenovo?
On 23/06/10 10:47, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the package file
in the
directory of the PKGBUILD. Example:
# ls -l *.gz
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 10:47, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 23/06/10 07:01, Attila wrote:
Hello together,
since the new pacman a makepkg run creates a symlink to the
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 05:48 Allan McRae wrote:
Possibly... I do not use makepkg -i as I use makepkg -sr so it
removed the makedepends that will be unneeded in the future. Using
makepkg -c clean up the dangling symlinks.
I even use makepkg -c too and the symlink is still there. And
On 23/06/10 15:11, Attila wrote:
Or do you mean that a makepkg -c will clean elder invalid symlinks?
This one.
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 06:06 Dan McGee wrote:
It is also a very helpful symlink for those of us that like to run
namcap after building to check the package.
That is an advantage ... because i forgot in the most cases to run it and now
the motivation to do it is higher.-)
See you, Attila
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 06:06 Dan McGee wrote:
It is also a very helpful symlink for those of us that like to run
namcap after building to check the package.
I must correct myself and have a from my view better idea for this.
I suggest a new option -n (or --namcap) which runs namacp after
40 matches
Mail list logo
