Hi,
I haven't upgrade to Xorg 1.8 yet. The problem is that i am using
catalyst-test driver i.e fglrx on my system. So i wanted to know if
there will be any problems if i upgrade to Xorg 1.8.
The reason i am asking this question is because of this
To get it work with xorg-server = 1.8 (when it
On 23/06/10 12:18, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
Hi,
I haven't upgrade to Xorg 1.8 yet. The problem is that i am using
catalyst-test driver i.e fglrx on my system. So i wanted to know if
there will be any problems if i upgrade to Xorg 1.8.
The reason i am asking this question is because of this
To
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/06/10 12:18, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
Hi,
I haven't upgrade to Xorg 1.8 yet. The problem is that i am using
catalyst-test driver i.e fglrx on my system. So i wanted to know if
there will be any problems if i
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati mkakati2...@gmail.com:
Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
No, it's 10.4. You should use catalyst from AUR. It's 10.6.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29111
Heiko
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati mkakati2...@gmail.com:
Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
No, it's 10.4. You should use catalyst from AUR. It's 10.6.
On 23/06/10 11:39, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baumsli...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakatimkakati2...@gmail.com:
Itsn't catalyst-test in AUR Catalyst 10.6?
No, it's 10.4. You should use catalyst from AUR.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote:
On 23/06/10 11:39, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baumsli...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakatimkakati2...@gmail.com:
Itsn't
On 23/06/10 12:02, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Nathan Waydekum...@konnichi.com wrote:
On 23/06/10 11:39, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Heiko Baumsli...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:50:37 +0530
schrieb Madhurya
Is there a way to disable the symbolic link creation? I install aur
packages using makepkg -ci, but the -ci switch combo does *not* delete
the symlink. I don't want them created in the first place, so can I
somehow turn off this behavior?
Sorry. I was having a blonde moment there. T500. Not X500.
I had X series servers on the brain from IBM.
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 07:26 Allan McRae wrote:
Or do you mean that a makepkg -c will clean elder invalid symlinks?
This one.
Is there a way to delete not only elder symlinks and the destination too? Could
be very nice but is not a must.-)
See you, Attila
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 14:20 ProfessorTomoe wrote:
Is there a way to disable the symbolic link creation? I install aur
packages using makepkg -ci, but the -ci switch combo does not delete
the symlink. I don't want them created in the first place, so can I
somehow turn off this behavior?
12 matches
Mail list logo