[arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Jordan Windsor
I'm following the guide available at this URL: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_bundled_32bit_system Currently I'm stuck on this step: [r...@archpc ~]# pacman --root /opt/arch32 --cachedir /opt/arch32/var/cache/pacman/pkg --config /opt/arch32/pacman.conf -S base base-devel

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:22:45 +0930 Jordan Windsor jorda...@gmail.com wrote: I'm following the guide available at this URL: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_bundled_32bit_system Currently I'm stuck on this step: [r...@archpc ~]# pacman --root /opt/arch32 --cachedir

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread PT M.
There's the line Architecture = auto in the new pacman.conf, maybe you can specify i686 here. On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Jordan Windsor jorda...@gmail.com wrote: I'm following the guide available at this URL: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_bundled_32bit_system

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 07/25/2010 10:52 AM, Jordan Windsor wrote: I'm following the guide available at this URL: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_bundled_32bit_system Currently I'm stuck on this step: [r...@archpc ~]# pacman --root /opt/arch32 --cachedir /opt/arch32/var/cache/pacman/pkg --config

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Norbert Zeh
PT M. [2010.07.25 1606 +0800]: There's the line Architecture = auto in the new pacman.conf, maybe you can specify i686 here. This is exactly what resolved the problem for me. Found this advice by googling a bit. - Norbert -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\

Re: [arch-general] New to Arch with problems with AUR

2010-07-25 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 23.07.2010 12:39, schrieb Nathan Wayde: On 23/07/10 11:36, Florian Pritz wrote: On 23.07.2010 12:27, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote: First i present myself. My name is Mario and i was reading this list for a few weeks. I'm coming from Debian, [...] Welcome :) For instance, i couldn't

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Jordan Windsor
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Norbert Zeh n...@cs.dal.ca wrote: PT M. [2010.07.25 1606 +0800]: There's the line Architecture = auto in the new pacman.conf, maybe you can specify i686 here. This is exactly what resolved the problem for me.  Found this advice by googling a bit. - Norbert

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 07/25/2010 01:13 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Norbert Zehn...@cs.dal.ca wrote: PT M. [2010.07.25 1606 +0800]: There's the line Architecture = auto in the new pacman.conf, maybe you can specify i686 here. This is exactly what resolved the problem for me.

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Jordan Windsor
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 01:13 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Norbert Zehn...@cs.dal.ca  wrote: PT M. [2010.07.25 1606 +0800]: There's the line Architecture = auto in the new pacman.conf, maybe you can

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Allan McRae
On 25/07/10 20:56, Jordan Windsor wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 01:13 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Norbert Zehn...@cs.dal.cawrote: PT M. [2010.07.25 1606 +0800]: There's the line Architecture =

Re: [arch-general] Chroot 32bit under 64bit; Problems with kernel package

2010-07-25 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 07/25/2010 01:56 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 01:13 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Norbert Zehn...@cs.dal.cawrote: PT M. [2010.07.25 1606 +0800]: There's the line

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-25 Thread Allan McRae
On 24/07/10 02:55, Dan Vratil wrote: I tried the latest version of mailman (2.1.13) as you suggested. I used the PKGBUILD from SVN trunk, but I modified it, so that it does not require /home/mailman and mailman user and group to exist during build and I modified the mailman.install file so that

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

2010-07-25 Thread Peter Lewis
Hi, On Sunday 25 Jul 2010 at 16:50 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: I also have some suggestions for these packages: - rename them from {jre,jdk} to {java6-sun-jre,java6-sun-jdk} or so would enable us to use different versions of SUN's JVM (Java5, 6 and 7) Well the open jdk package is called openjdk6.

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

2010-07-25 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Hi, On Sunday 25 Jul 2010 at 16:50 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: I also have some suggestions for these packages: - rename them from {jre,jdk} to {java6-sun-jre,java6-sun-jdk} or so would enable us to use different versions of SUN's JVM (Java5, 6 and 7)

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

2010-07-25 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Hi, On Sunday 25 Jul 2010 at 16:50 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: I also have some suggestions for these packages: - rename them from {jre,jdk} to

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

2010-07-25 Thread Guillaume ALAUX
On 25 July 2010 18:45, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:37 PM, Guillaume ALAUX wrote: On 25 July 2010 18:17, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/25/2010 07:14 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Hi, On Sunday 25 Jul 2010 at 16:50 Guillaume ALAUX wrote: I also have