Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Forum Update in Progress

2010-08-01 Thread Peter Lewis
On Friday 30 Jul 2010 at 10:51 Peter Lewis wrote: Now it's done, the fonts are all big! Is it just my eyes, or can they be made smaller again (the fonts, not my eyes)? Ah, just realised that the forum has different themes :-) Excellent work, thanks! Pete.

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:47:24 -0700 Alex Matviychuk alex...@gmail.com wrote: I just spent some time setting up my new laptop with an SSD to use NILFS2 as its root filesystem and I'm very pleased with the performance. In an effort to get better support for NILFS2 in arch I've added a request

Re: [arch-general] pacman segfault problem

2010-08-01 Thread b1
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:06 -0700, b1 wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 01:50 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 30.07.2010 22:27, b1 wrote: ~~ Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks Benedikt Use the Arch install medium and its working pacman and set

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Heiko Baums
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:47:24 -0700 Alex Matviychuk alex...@gmail.com wrote: In an effort to get better support for NILFS2 in arch I've added a request to move nilfs-utils to the base group I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I agree with moving it to [core]

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200 Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I agree with moving it to [core] but not to base, because base is assumed to be installed on every computer and packages in the base group are usually

Re: [arch-general] pacman segfault problem

2010-08-01 Thread Dan McGee
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:14 AM, b1 fo...@b1online.de wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:06 -0700, b1 wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 01:50 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 30.07.2010 22:27, b1 wrote: ~~ Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks Benedikt

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Sonntag 01 August 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200 Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I agree with moving it to [core] but not to base, because base is assumed to be installed on

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Dan McGee
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Sonntag 01 August 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200 Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I agree with moving it

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 01/48] Bashification of initscripts

2010-08-01 Thread Victor Lowther
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 31.07.2010 18:44, schrieb Victor Lowther: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 23.07.2010 22:58, schrieb Victor Lowther: After looking over it again, you are correct --

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Sonntag 01 August 2010 schrieb Dan McGee: On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote: Am Sonntag 01 August 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200 Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: I don't think that nilfs-utils

[arch-general] New Xorg nv / nouveau

2010-08-01 Thread fons
Hello all, The system I reported on in my previous post does seem to work, but graphical performance is *very* slow. (xorg 1.8, nv, nvidia Quadro FX 770M) This problem is obvious for xterm (for the first time in years I had to revert to a native X font to get any speed) and also quite evident

Re: [arch-general] community/jre and community/jdk packages are out of date - PKGBUILD proposal

2010-08-01 Thread ALAUX, Guillaume
On 31 July 2010 12:37, ALAUX, Guillaume guilla...@alaux.net wrote: On 31 July 2010 12:23, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/31/2010 01:08 PM, ALAUX, Guillaume wrote: On 31 July 2010 11:51, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/31/2010 12:22 PM, ALAUX, Guillaume wrote: I

Re: [arch-general] Better NILFS2 Support

2010-08-01 Thread Alex Matviychuk
Yes sure i believe it works, my concerns are more that the main tools just don't support it, which makes it imho more complicated to implement the installation support. So here is what I needed to mess with to get it working: Kernel: Version 2 of the filesystem, known as NILFS2, is included

[arch-general] [namcap] [PATCH] Check for packages that should be 'any'

2010-08-01 Thread David Campbell
If a package has no elf files but is not 'any', throw a warning saying that the package could be 'any'. --- Namcap/anyelf.py | 18 ++ namcap-tags |1 + 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Namcap/anyelf.py b/Namcap/anyelf.py index

[arch-general] No updates in a while - Is this the 'untiered mirror' thing?

2010-08-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, It is rare I go a week without some type of update. My last update was: [2010-07-25 04:49] upgraded wavegain (1.2.8-1 - 1.2.8-2) Looking at archdev-public, there is a 7/24 no more untiered mirrors post from Roman about the need to shut down mirrors. Is this what is behind no