Am Montag 02 August 2010 schrieb Alex Matviychuk:
Yes sure i believe it
works, my concerns
are more that the main tools just don't support it,
which makes it imho
more complicated to implement the installation
support.
So here is what I needed to mess with to get it working:
Kernel:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:37 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
It is rare I go a week without some type of update. My last update
was:
[2010-07-25 04:49] upgraded wavegain (1.2.8-1 - 1.2.8-2)
Looking at archdev-public, there is a 7/24 no more untiered
I've noticed the same thing. No updates in a week. Very unusual for the
packages I use.
On Aug 2, 2010 3:17 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr burl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:37 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
It is rare I go a week without some type
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 at 08:24 Robert Howard wrote:
I've noticed the same
thing. No updates in a week. Very unusual for the
packages I use.
This
thread just prompted me to check and yeah I hadn't had anything for at least
a few days. I just did a sort of Monte-Carlo test, by switching mirrors
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Peter Lewis p...@muddygoat.org wrote:
thread just prompted me to check and yeah I hadn't had anything for at least
a few days. I just did a sort of Monte-Carlo test, by switching mirrors in
/etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist and suddenly got a whole load of updates.
-Mensaje original-
De: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org [mailto:arch-general-
boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Peter Lewis
Enviado el: lunes, 02 de agosto de 2010 9:33
Para: arch-general@archlinux.org
Asunto: Re: [arch-general] No updates in a while - Is this the 'untiered
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 at 08:48 Kazuo Teramoto wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at
4:33 AM, Peter Lewis p...@muddygoat.org wrote:
thread just prompted me
to check and yeah I hadn't had anything for at
least a few days. I just
did a sort of Monte-Carlo test, by switching
mirrors in
On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
write_srcinfo(). This generates a file .SRCINFO - like the .PKGINFO
one - when makepkg --source is run and then it is added to the src.tar.gz
archive.
I think having such a
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:58:00 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the
On 31/07/2010 14:00, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 13:30, schrieb jesse jaara:
The name and description of the arch-dev-public mailing list are
extreamly misleading, for me personally the name and description tells that
the list is open for everyone to discuss about development of Arch
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
write_srcinfo(). This generates a file .SRCINFO - like the .PKGINFO
one - when makepkg --source is run and then it
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, vlad v...@uni-bonn.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new function
write_srcinfo(). This generates a file .SRCINFO -
On Mon 02 Aug 2010 17:03 +0200, vlad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:49:11AM -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
On Tue 27 Jul 2010 15:25 +0200, vlad wrote:
Here is a patch against makepkg from git which introduces a new
function write_srcinfo(). This generates a file .SRCINFO - like
the
On Monday 02 Aug 2010 at 15:50 Firmicus wrote:
On 31/07/2010 14:00, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 13:30, schrieb jesse jaara:
The name and description of the arch-dev-public mailing list are
extreamly misleading, for me personally the name and description tells
that the list is
On 08/02/2010 02:17 AM, Burlynn Corlew Jr wrote:
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=MirrorStatus
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mirror
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Beginners'_Guide#Mirrorcheck_for_up-to-date_packages
It is possible your current installed package list has had no updates,
Am Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
schrieb Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us:
Just for information, the opposite point of view recently came up on
the suckless mailing-list:
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1007/5256.html
I prefer Arch's approach but it is probably true that a large base
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:08:50 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
schrieb Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us:
Just for information, the opposite point of view recently came up on
the suckless mailing-list:
Am Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:10:22 +0200
schrieb Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be:
I think they mean keeping regular packages like usual, but just making
more packages part of the base group.
And like I said earlier, I don't see the point either.
This indeed doesn't make much sense, too.
I
Guys,
My logs have been filling up with avahi-daemon messages. The avahi errors
always appear in groups of 3:
Aug 2 16:05:03 nirvana avahi-daemon[1954]: Invalid query packet.
Aug 2 16:05:03 nirvana avahi-daemon[1954]: Invalid query packet.
Aug 2 16:05:03 nirvana avahi-daemon[1954]:
Would be useful to put a script in cron using reflector to update mirrors
say, once a week?
On 08/02/2010 06:44 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Notices did go out on one of the lists (forgot which one) that the new
tiered mirror scheme was coming into effect.
Link? I don't recall seeing anything about that either here or on the
Arch announcements list.
Thanks,
DR
I don't know if this was addressed before, I'm sorry to say this and you'll
probably hate me but it's something that get my attention: the
authentication in Arch's website is, at least, very unefficient. At worst,
it's directly against Arch's Way, I think (I'm not the best guy to say this,
just
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:38 -0400, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 08/02/2010 06:44 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Notices did go out on one of the lists (forgot which one) that the new
tiered mirror scheme was coming into effect.
Link? I don't recall seeing anything about that either here or on the
Guys,
Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors could not copy sent mail
to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
snip
Aug 2 17:15:03 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal: Dovecot version mismatch:
Master is v1.2.12, login is v1.2.13 (if you don't care, set
On 2 August 2010 22:00, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors could not copy
sent mail to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
snip
Aug 2 17:15:03 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal:
On 08/02/10 at 10:39pm, Tavian Barnes wrote:
On 2 August 2010 22:00, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com
wrote:
Guys,
Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors could not copy
sent mail to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
snip
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 06:52:45 J. W. Birdsong wrote:
Great point; but we could at least mention **Restart Dovecot with
#/etc/rc.d/dovecot restart** (or some such msg) in the dovecot.install
file.Because we know EVERYONE reads the pacman msg(s) after an
install. Regardless I think
You can restart openssh without being kicked off.
Tavian Barnes taviana...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2010 22:00, David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors could not copy
sent mail to 'sent' on servername?
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 23:00 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Sending mail from my local server resulted in errors could not copy
sent mail
to 'sent' on servername? Checking the mail logs, I found this:
snip
Aug 2 17:15:03 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal: Dovecot version
Hi,
is possible to image my current Arch system into a USB pendrive and use it
from there?
Many thanks!
Martín
Guys,
This is just a point of interest more than anything else. Many of you know I
came to Arch from suse and one of the reasons was suse announced plan to
eliminate kde3 in its 11.2 release in early 2009. Arch had chakra and it worked
great so Arch was a great logical choice.
It seems
On 08/02/2010 11:39 PM, Tavian Barnes wrote:
Because of KISS? Pacman is a package manager, not a system administration tool.
Imagine the story with a different daemon: SSH. You ssh into your
box, su, and pacman -Syu. Halfway through the upgrade, openssh gets
updated, which automatically
32 matches
Mail list logo
