Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-04 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGeedpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowskit.p...@gmx.de wrote: Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches. I already have .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-04 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:14 +0200 schrieb Attila vodoo0...@sonnenkinder.org: Only for the stats: In the case of updating packages Yast, and im suprised that you use this more than zypper, don't touch changed config files because opensuse, and every other rpm basesd distribution, do the same as

Re: [arch-general] package name foo vs libfoo (eg. clutter vs libclutter)

2010-08-04 Thread Ray Rashif
On 4 August 2010 03:55, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:  On 03.08.2010 23:21, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote: Hello, this may be a minor issue, but it's bugging me so much that i had to write it here. and please link me to any previous discussion if this was asked before, i was kinda

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-04 Thread Peter Lewis
Hi, On Wednesday 04 Aug 2010 at 06:22 Andreas Radke wrote: You seem to want to use a distribution made safe for less skilled users. Why do you keep wasting our time suggesting to make Arch something it's not meant to be??? I don't think that David necessarily does want this, and I hope no one

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-04 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:22:41 +0100 schrieb Peter Lewis p...@muddygoat.org: WARNING: Constructive part of the post!! :-) If you think you need a list of packages to remember where you should interact, go on and create one your own. Absolutely, why not? If someone really wants to implement

Re: [arch-general] package name foo vs libfoo (eg. clutter vs libclutter)

2010-08-04 Thread Andre Osku Schmidt
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote: On 4 August 2010 03:55, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:  On 03.08.2010 23:21, Andre Osku Schmidt wrote: Hello, this may be a minor issue, but it's bugging me so much that i had to write it here. and please

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-04 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 08/04/2010 02:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGeedpmc...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowskit.p...@gmx.de

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 08/04/2010 02:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org  wrote: On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGeedpmc...@gmail.com    wrote:

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.08.2010 13:28, schrieb Dan McGee: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: it was reported and we have a patch available http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20353 Awesome, good to see. It might be a pain in the ass but this is going to get reported again and

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-1

2010-08-04 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 04.08.2010 13:28, schrieb Dan McGee: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: it was reported and we have a patch available http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20353 Awesome, good to see.

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-2

2010-08-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but at: http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kernel26/ Please sign off (also, please someone with the b43 problem test if this is fixed). signature.asc

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-2

2010-08-04 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0200 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but at: http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kernel26/ Please sign off (also,

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-2

2010-08-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.08.2010 17:50, schrieb Thorsten Töpper: On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0200 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but at:

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-2

2010-08-04 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:11:27 +0200 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 04.08.2010 17:50, schrieb Thorsten Töpper: On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0200 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having. This package is

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux in Linux-Magazin 09/2010 (German Edition)

2010-08-04 Thread Firmicus
On 03/08/2010 13:20, Mathias Huber wrote: Hi, for those who wanted to be alerted: My short writeup on Arch Linux for Linux-Magazin (German Edition) is freely available online: http://www.linux-magazin.de/Heft-Abo/Ausgaben/2010/09/Frische-Ware Best Regards, Mathias I have indeed just

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-04 Thread Myra Nelson
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 04:07, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: Am Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:22:41 +0100 schrieb Peter Lewis p...@muddygoat.org: WARNING: Constructive part of the post!! :-) If you think you need a list of packages to remember where you should interact, go on and create one

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.34.2-2

2010-08-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.08.2010 16:39, schrieb Thomas Bächler: This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but at: http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kernel26/ Please sign off (also, please someone with the b43 problem