Am 04.08.2010 16:39, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having.
> This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but at:
>
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kernel26/
>
> Please sign off (also, please someone with the b43 prob
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 04:07, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:22:41 +0100
> schrieb Peter Lewis :
>
>> WARNING: Constructive part of the post!! :-)
>>
>> > If you think you need a list of packages to remember where you
>> > should interact, go on and create one your own.
>>
>> Absolut
On 03/08/2010 13:20, Mathias Huber wrote:
Hi,
for those who wanted to be alerted: My short writeup on Arch Linux for
Linux-Magazin (German Edition) is freely available online:
http://www.linux-magazin.de/Heft-Abo/Ausgaben/2010/09/Frische-Ware
Best Regards,
Mathias
I have indeed just receiv
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:11:27 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 04.08.2010 17:50, schrieb Thorsten Töpper:
> > On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0200
> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >> This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been
> >> having. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently
Am 04.08.2010 17:50, schrieb Thorsten Töpper:
> On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0200
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having.
>> This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but
>> at:
>>
>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/k
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:02 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having.
> This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but
> at:
>
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kernel26/
>
> Please sign off (also, please someone wi
This new build fixes the b43 trouble lots of users have been having.
This package is NOT in testing (2.6.35 currently resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/kernel26/
Please sign off (also, please someone with the b43 problem test if this
is fixed).
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 04.08.2010 13:28, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>>> it was reported and we have a patch available
>>>
>>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20353
>>
>> Awesome, good to see. It might be a pain in the
Am 04.08.2010 13:28, schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>> it was reported and we have a patch available
>>
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20353
>
> Awesome, good to see. It might be a pain in the ass but this is going
> to get reported again and again if we
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 08/04/2010 02:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:
Am 04.08.2010 13:23, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> it has ssb changes and b43 relies on it
>
> Thanks, Ionuț. So much for a stable release...I should probably let
> them know upstream, no? Is this something to send to linux-stable?
This is the second time they introduced a regression within a stable
seri
On 08/04/2010 02:23 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGeewrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowskiwrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff f
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
>>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 4 August 2010 03:55, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> On 03.08.2010 23:21, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this may be a minor issue, but it's bugging me so much that i had to
>>> write it here. and please link me to any previous
Am Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:22:41 +0100
schrieb Peter Lewis :
> WARNING: Constructive part of the post!! :-)
>
> > If you think you need a list of packages to remember where you
> > should interact, go on and create one your own.
>
> Absolutely, why not? If someone really wants to implement this, why
Hi,
On Wednesday 04 Aug 2010 at 06:22 Andreas Radke wrote:
> You seem to want to use a distribution made safe for less skilled
> users. Why do you keep wasting our time suggesting to make Arch
> something it's not meant to be???
I don't think that David necessarily does want this, and I hope no o
On 4 August 2010 03:55, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 03.08.2010 23:21, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this may be a minor issue, but it's bugging me so much that i had to
>> write it here. and please link me to any previous discussion if this
>> was asked before, i was kinda lazy t
Am Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:14 +0200
schrieb Attila :
> Only for the stats: In the case of updating packages Yast, and im
> suprised that you use this more than zypper, don't touch changed
> config files because opensuse, and every other rpm basesd
> distribution, do the same as archlinux with *.rpmsav
18 matches
Mail list logo
