On 08/11/2010 06:57 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
hmmm not sure what do here (previously owned by kdebase-runtime)
should I just force this?
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
snip
you might want to report on our tracker to make sure it gets to the
right people
--
Ionuț
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de
Date: 2 August 2010 21:46
Subject: [arch-dev-public] Fwd: Junior Developer Mentor Scheme
To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development
arch-dev-pub...@archlinux.org
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
On 08/11/2010 02:31 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
could we xport this discussion to forums? else more productive for
mailing list would be a proposal for inclusion into pacman.
C Anthony
Thank you C Anthony, good point:
With version 0.0.7, it now has the capability to run completely
Upstream update, please test and sign off.
We should probably be able to move this to core by the end of the week
unless major problems occur.
Please also sign off on 2.6.34.3 (see
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-August/017557.html),
I'd like to move that to core
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:17 PM, J. W. Birdsong
jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com wrote:
On 08/11/10 at 05:05am, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
snip /snip
Again?? Really??
I have a headache. Why isn't Fidel Castro helping me??
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting
rebuilds.
However, it would have to be used by anyone wanting to rebuild a
package
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
would be used by anyone directly. It mainly meant for collecting
Forward Rationale: To give end users (and potential devs) an opportunity
to discuss this too.
On 11-08-2010 16:29, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi devs,
my last attempt for this didn't get much feedback so I try to keep it
short this time...for more details see the old thread at:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Let me underline again that [staging] would be no regular repo that
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:06 +0100, Mario Figueiredo
mario.figueir...@quiettech.org wrote:
Forward Rationale: To give end users (and potential devs) an
The idea can be summed up like this:
testing:
* don't break packages intentionally
* don't push incomplete rebuilds
This would
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:16 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On 08/11/2010 02:31 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
could we xport this discussion to forums? else more productive for
mailing list would be a proposal for inclusion into pacman.
C Anthony
Thank you C
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:40:56 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dan McGee
On 12 August 2010 02:07, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Pierre seems to have forgotten about community-testing I guess. :)
-Dan
I don't have a strong resentment against this, but if it can be sorted
out soon, we can test the water with the python rebuild.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
15 matches
Mail list logo
