On 08/16/2010 05:35 AM, Auguste Pop wrote:
after a recent update, i found out that telepathy-butterfly is broken.
/usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-butterfly, running manually from a
console, complains about requiring papyon= 0.5.0, while to he
package state it requires papyon= 0.4.9. but there is
Haha. Don't be so aggressive against discussion on an issue that you
brought up in the first place. We're just trying to help put things in
their proper place. But yeah I agree there are too many silly tangents
on this issue. So let somebody submit a patch and get it over with.
Ah wasn't
Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of 2010-08-16 00:03:59 +0200:
Guys,
Here is a quick browser tip for firefox. About a year ago I stumbled
across
'NightShift - Eyecare' that did a fantastic job at basically inverting the
way
firefox rendered pages darkening the display and
On 16 August 2010 15:12, mike rosset schizoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha. Don't be so aggressive against discussion on an issue that you
brought up in the first place. We're just trying to help put things in
their proper place. But yeah I agree there are too many silly tangents
on this issue. So
On 16/08/10 21:08, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 16 August 2010 15:12, mike rossetschizoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha. Don't be so aggressive against discussion on an issue that you
brought up in the first place. We're just trying to help put things in
their proper place. But yeah I agree there are too
http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/communitypkg
Currently all commands that send something to the repos are commented.
- two seperate paths : monolithic or splitted package
- script take care when arch, pkgver, pkgrel are redefined in package()
functions
- archrelease is only called for archs who
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
http://pkgbuild.com/~lcarlier/communitypkg
Currently all commands that send something to the repos are commented.
- two seperate paths : monolithic or splitted package
- script take care when arch, pkgver, pkgrel
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:18:58 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
Can also haz bug report? -- http://bugs.archlinux.org/
FYI, there was one a while back... It was closed as won't fix.
Why?
Heiko
Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit :
Patches are a lot more likely to get looked at by any of us. And yes,
this should probably be more than one patch.
http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/
Hre are the patches (5), i hope i've not introduce bug while merging my
changes
Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:24:29, vous avez écrit :
Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit :
Patches are a lot more likely to get looked at by any of us. And yes,
this should probably be more than one patch.
http://projects.archlinux.org/devtools.git/
Hre are the patches (5),
I want to give my 2 cents of feedback to this issue posted in
[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.35.2-1 :
(I had the impression that it might be heating up my laptop more than
normal, but then I was doing backups last night, and I'm feeling a part of
my laptop that I'm not sure if it's
On 08/16/10 12:55, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
I'm having fan noise issue since latest kernel update. While system does run
smooth, there's a notable increment of noise from the fan that seems to be
running a little faster. On the other hand the videocard cooler seems to run
as silent as ever.
On 08/16/2010 07:38 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote:
Indeed nice stuff, but...
Stylish is supposed to work with Chrome, and I tried it with
Chromium 5.0.375.99 - an error message unable to open a transaction to
the database keeps popping up...
Cheers,
Sergey
Philipp, Sergey,
I hadn't tried
Do you mean that 2.6.34.3 has increased fan-noise from an earlier 2.6.34
release? 2.6.34.3 is not the same as 2.6.35.* but may have some of the same
patches...
-Isaac
Hi Isaac,
exactly, fan-noise is louder now.
Far beyond, If you listen my PC's case you will hear how, from time to time
On 08/15/2010 06:46 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote:
Actually, my fan mostly didn't speed up, instead the temp (if this is real) got
hotter, so I manually adjusted it up a bit (via some macbook-fan-specific
mechanism), but maybe it's the same thing (macbook linux are long known to run
the fan a little
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:29 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
...
The local file issue should be an easy fix.
...
Yes, just add url-prefix(file://) to the end of @-moz-document
section. In my example for Midnight Style script,
@-moz-document url-prefix(http://),
Excerpts from ms's message of 2010-08-16 22:36:45 +0200:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:29 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
...
The local file issue should be an easy fix.
...
Yes, just add url-prefix(file://) to the end of @-moz-document
section. In my example for
On 08/17/2010 02:50 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Good point on power consumption. I'll see if I can find powertop in
AUR. The instrumentation on my laptop sucks - few sensors, but my best
sensors are my hands. The CPU and GPU are located in the left side of
my laptop and you can feel the temp
Le 15/08/2010 23:45, David C. Rankin a écrit :
The kicker is temp issues are hard to chase down. Something is putting
more demand on the processor in the 2.6.35 setup, but what??
Be sure to test with kernel 2.6.35.2, not previous releases.
This patch [1] may reduce CPU wakeups from
On 08/16/2010 09:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:18:58 +1000
schrieb Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org:
Can also haz bug report? -- http://bugs.archlinux.org/
FYI, there was one a while back... It was closed as won't fix.
Why?
Heiko
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231
Am 17.08.2010 00:42, schrieb Matthew Monaco:
On 08/16/2010 09:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:18:58 +1000
schrieb Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org:
Can also haz bug report? -- http://bugs.archlinux.org/
FYI, there was one a while back... It was closed as won't fix.
Why?
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:55 -0400
schrieb Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231
I requested to re-open this bug.
Heiko
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:55 -0400
schrieb Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231
I requested to re-open this bug.
Heiko
Thank you Heiko, I'll submit the patch if the task ever
On 08/16/2010 07:50 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:42:55 -0400
schrieb Matthew Monacodgbale...@verizon.net:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12231
I requested to re-open this bug.
Heiko
I didn't give the link so you could reopen it. I think the short discussion
makes it
Excerpts from Filip Filipov's message of Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:08 +0300:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Filip Filipov pilif.pi...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 18:39
Subject: Re: [arch-general] FF Browser Tip for Archers who like a
darker desktop (DR, you listening?)
Guys,
This one caught me by surprise. I have my test server that I update before
updating my regular server. It is based on a MSI K9N2 board (MS-7374) with a
Phenom 9850 proc 8G of ram. The box has 2 dmraid arrays:
[22:00 ecstasy:/mnt/arch] # dmraid -r
/dev/sdd: nvidia, nvidia_baaccaja,
On 08/16/2010 10:17 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
After boot to the normal 2.6.34 kernel, the box kept automatically
rebooting itself - WTF? So I booted to the LTS kernel, which booted this time
and rebuilt the initramfs file with:
/sbin/mkinitcpio -k 2.6.34-ARCH -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g
27 matches
Mail list logo
