On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 23:02 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 09/01/2010 06:08 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Pacman helps you manage your system, it doesn't (and shouldn't) try to
> > make assumptions about stuff like this, because that's your job. You
> > know your system better than anyone else (idea
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 23:33, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 11:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> I had opened a bug on it, but I guess somebody closed it because I can't
>> find
>> the bug now.
>
> Correction - I didn't open a bug on this one, I was thinking about the
> dmraid fail to b
In case anyone uses it, I updated my fduppkg script that scans
/var/cache/pacman/pkg and moves duplicate packages to a separate directory so
you can either keep the current + last package sets or just delete the dups.
This update just cleans up the output and adds an -s | --silent option that
s
On 09/02/2010 11:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
I had opened a bug on it, but I guess somebody closed it because I can't find
the bug now.
Correction - I didn't open a bug on this one, I was thinking about the dmraid
fail to boot bug where I provided all the hardware info:
http://bugs.archlin
On 09/02/2010 04:34 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
David:
Stupid question 1, is the usbhid-ups a kernel module (I assume it is,
just making sure)?
Stupid question 2, do you have the module listed in the modules
section of your rc.conf?
I've found it much easier to list the modules I need in the rc.conf
On 09/01/2010 06:08 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Pacman helps you manage your system, it doesn't (and shouldn't) try to
make assumptions about stuff like this, because that's your job. You
know your system better than anyone else (ideally).
And your assertion about 'blowing up a 288 package update' is n
Robert Howard wrote:
> Perhaps I misstated my point. My system is pretty snappy when it's working
> right (it should be as I've got 8GB RAM and 8 CPU cores) but since the
> last update Dolphin literally stop working for short periods when you
> interact with files (mouse over, click, right click).
Perhaps I misstated my point. My system is pretty snappy when it's working
right (it should be as I've got 8GB RAM and 8 CPU cores) but since the last
update Dolphin literally stop working for short periods when you interact
with files (mouse over, click, right click). It's a total freeze of the
ap
Hello altogether
and especially to the people contributing to the multilib repo.
Having this repo is so damn great! Really good work. If I would have
been asked to send in a wishlist, of my most desired features, a month
ago such a repo would have been on place one!!!
Thank you guys
Benedikt
Recently after upgrading KDE on my arch64 installation,
neither dolphin or konqueror don't show thumbnails for images.
They just show the thumbnail as a question mark (like that for an
unknown file).
I deleted the configuration, etc. but still no solution.
What can be the problem? A bug or som
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 15:54, Rafael Beraldo
wrote:
> I added hdparm -B 254 /dev/sda to /etc/rc.local, but I don't know if it is a
> good solution either. Anyway, as Isaac Dupree said, unfortunatelly there is
> no intermediate setting, then it is best not to have anoying and (I think)
> dangerous
On 2 September 2010 10:46, Nicolas Bevilacqua wrote:
>
> I have the same netbook and the same problem. I resolved by changing a few
> lines in the file /etc/hdparm.conf.
>
> Adding at the end the lines:
>
> # apm setting when on battery
> apm_battery = 254
> # -S standby (spindown) timeout for the
El 02/09/2010 01:58 a.m., David C. Rankin escribió:
On 09/01/2010 10:22 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 09/01/10 00:25, Rafael Beraldo wrote:
The thing is, 128 keeps the hard disc spinning down a lot. In fact,
254 is
quite noiseless, but as from 253 the clicking sound returns. I read
this bug
page
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 05:39 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 09/01/2010 07:08 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:58 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >> On 09/01/2010 08:59 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >>>
> but in any even
On 09/01/2010 07:08 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:58 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 09/01/2010 08:59 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
but in any event, related or not,
dovecot should update without failing due to the existing
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 03:08, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I've tried sever reinstalls of talking archlinux after the August 19, 2010
> kernel update and though the Linux installs, it never comes up talking. The
> sound card device of course is controled by udev so this explains the reason
> for the fai
I've tried sever reinstalls of talking archlinux after the August 19, 2010
kernel update and though the Linux installs, it never comes up talking.
The sound card device of course is controled by udev so this explains the
reason for the failures. I'm doing internet installs since that's how
tha
17 matches
Mail list logo
