On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 03:25 +0100, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
I confess I'm baffled as to why upstream did this change, why it was
needed and if it actually was needed.
I can't seem to find anything about it in the online changelog
either.
Seems something completely arbitrary. Or an oversight.
Hi bump to latest version,
please signoff both arches,
thanks
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 22:48, Aaron Schaefer aa...@elasticdog.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
On 09.09.2010 11:55, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this
is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very
strange) upstream versioning scheme.
That's just git describe.
tag-commits since tagged commit-last commit
On 9 September 2010 13:02, Florian Pritz bluew...@server-speed.net wrote:
On 09.09.2010 11:55, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this
is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very
strange) upstream versioning
Page Local mirros was removed from wiki by this reason:
-
It is generally frowned upon to create a local mirror due the bandwidth that is
required.
There is not a good reason to create a local mirror, since one of the
alternatives below will likely meet your needs.
-
I think it's very
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:02:02 +0200, Florian Pritz
bluew...@server-speed.net wrote:
On 09.09.2010 11:55, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
this will hopefully the last update of xz for some time. :-) Maybe this
is a sign for the final 5.0 version to be near. I am now using the (very
strange) upstream
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Fess killall_hum...@lavabit.com wrote:
Page Local mirros was removed from wiki by this reason:
-
It is generally frowned upon to create a local mirror due the bandwidth that
is required.
There is not a good reason to create a local mirror, since one of
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:55:35 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Fess killall_hum...@lavabit.com wrote:
Page Local mirros was removed from wiki by this reason:
-
It is generally frowned upon to create a local mirror due the bandwidth that
On 09/09/10 14:11, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:55:35 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Fesskillall_hum...@lavabit.com wrote:
Page Local mirros was removed from wiki by this reason:
-
It is generally frowned upon to create
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
For some reason pacman is superslow, and I'm not allowed to create/use
loopback devices.
pacman-optimize takes
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com
wrote:
I have an OpenVZ VPS running arch.
For some reason pacman is superslow,
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 08.09.2010 06:16, schrieb Victor Lowther:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com
wrote:
Instead of checking for the existance of a file in /var/run/daemons
on
every iteration, handle the null case by setting nullglob.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:05:47 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:48:06 +1000, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Just a reminder for people to look at their packages and rebuild
On 09/09/10 16:19, Victor Lowther wrote:
Thomas Bächlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 08.09.2010 06:16, schrieb Victor Lowther:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Dave Reisnerd...@falconindy.com
wrote:
Instead of checking for the existance of a file in /var/run/daemons
on
every
Okay, sorry about that.
Here's the relevant stuff:
uptime:
22:04:53 up 26 days, 17:16, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00
Now it doesn't seem to touch even 1.
free -m:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 512251260
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:57:18 +0300, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:05:47 +0200, Pierre Schmitz
pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:48:06 +1000, Allan McRae
Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote:
On 09/09/10 16:19, Victor Lowther wrote:
Thomas Bächlertho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 08.09.2010 06:16, schrieb Victor Lowther:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Dave Reisnerd...@falconindy.com
wrote:
Instead of checking for the existance of a
These comments were removed from the default pacman.conf, so let's
remove them from these default configuration files as well.
---
pacman-extra.conf|5 -
pacman-multilib.conf |6 --
pacman-staging.conf |7 ---
pacman-testing.conf |5 -
4 files changed, 0
HI,
Is it possible an IRC OP can contact me off list?
Cheers
Callum
On 09/09/2010 10:09 PM, Callum Scott wrote:
HI,
Is it possible an IRC OP can contact me off list?
Cheers
Callum
sure, what's up?
--
Ionuț
Hi list.
Few days ago I've succesfully installed arch. It was booting really fast
first time (i.e. without gnome, networkmanager, etc).
After installing GNOME and some daemons, adding them to the rc.conf, the
system now takes 30-40 seconds to load.
I heard that HAL daemon takes a lot of time
22 matches
Mail list logo
