On 09/18/2010 05:44 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 02:50:17PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
which seems an appropriate question, given the circumstances of
removal; if the only reason was to discourage the creation of local
mirrors... well, to me at least, that seem
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Like I've written on the arch-multilib mailing list I'd prefer to
> having flashplugin in [multilib] renamed to lib32-flashplugin or
> bin32-flashplugin and the new 64 bit version added to [extra] as
> flashplugin at least if the new 64 bit ver
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 14:50 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
> could a script be created that simply spreads the load to _all_ the
> official mirrors? the DB files could be pulled from archlinux.org,
> but the packages could be retrieved from all mirrors in parallel...
Archlinux.org is just an
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 02:50:17PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> which seems an appropriate question, given the circumstances of
> removal; if the only reason was to discourage the creation of local
> mirrors... well, to me at least, that seems a poor reason.
>
> i sympathize with some of th
2010/9/18 Stefan Erik Wilkens :
> 2010/9/18 Guus Snijders :
>> On 17-09-10 09:34, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote:
>>>
>>> Well then the situation is rather simple, isn't it.
>>>
>>> If the amount of traffic a private local mirror generates for the
>>> official mirror is greater than the amount of traffi
On 09/18/2010 10:47 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
What problems where you experiencing? Im having similar issues.
Chris,
I have had a number of lock-on-boot issues with the past few kernels on both my
laptop and test server. The information is scatters over a several month period
of time on th
2010/9/18 Guus Snijders :
> On 17-09-10 09:34, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote:
>>
>> Well then the situation is rather simple, isn't it.
>>
>> If the amount of traffic a private local mirror generates for the
>> official mirror is greater than the amount of traffic that any local
>> clients (excluding a
On 17-09-10 09:34, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote:
Well then the situation is rather simple, isn't it.
If the amount of traffic a private local mirror generates for the
official mirror is greater than the amount of traffic that any local
clients (excluding any "other purposes" unrelated to the sync p
Hi,
recently bin86 was removed from base-devel group but the unique way I know to
see this change is manually reading the pkg changelog in the arch site.
The problem is simple, how to detect this change in pacman?
For example, after a gnome upgrade, if a new package is added to gnome group I
can
What problems where you experiencing? Im having similar issues.
On 18 September 2010 04:10, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Just dropping a line to let you know that I haven't had a
> hang-on-boot with kernel26-2.6.35.4-2. That's great. I'll keep you posted,
> but it looks like the issu
10 matches
Mail list logo
