Re: [arch-general] no python3 package?

2010-10-06 Thread Angus
> Hmm...  I probably should have added a version to the provides line in the > python package.   Currently it only provides "python3" and not a version so > the versioned deps in those AUR packages are causing issues.  I'll get > around to that before this exits [testing] > > Allan > Yes, that

Re: [arch-general] no python3 package?

2010-10-06 Thread Allan McRae
On 07/10/10 14:59, Angus wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote: I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3 being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to 'python3.x'). But what's the reason for no longer ha

Re: [arch-general] no python3 package?

2010-10-06 Thread Angus
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote: >> >> I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3 >> being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to >> 'python3.x'). >> >> But what's the reason for no longer having a package nam

Re: [arch-general] no python3 package?

2010-10-06 Thread Allan McRae
On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote: I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3 being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to 'python3.x'). But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3' with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made

[arch-general] no python3 package?

2010-10-06 Thread Angus
I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3 being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to 'python3.x'). But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3' with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made) the transition a little easier,

[arch-general] update to kde 4.5.2 - no sound - tries to remove my devices??

2010-10-06 Thread David C. Rankin
om/dl/Archlinux/bugs/kde4-nosound.png The sound is "HDA Nvidia (ALC888 Analog)" and the same for digital and HDMI. I looked through dmesg to see if there was anything glaring, but there wasn't. (dmesg output here): [44k] http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/Archlinux/bugs/dmesg-2010100

Re: [arch-general] Rope as a anjuta dependency

2010-10-06 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2010/10/6 Tomás Acauan Schertel : > Now that Anjuta IDE supports python, and to have full integration with > python, rope [1] is needed, isn't a good idea bring rope do extra repo > instead of having it in AUR? > > Thanks. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13702 > > Good idea, also

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >  On 06.10.2010 19:39, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Tom wrote: I'm seconding this. r300g is working exceptionally well compared to r300 and it is very stable even with lots of 3D stuff and wine ga

[arch-general] Rope as a anjuta dependency

2010-10-06 Thread Tomás Acauan Schertel
Now that Anjuta IDE supports python, and to have full integration with python, rope [1] is needed, isn't a good idea bring rope do extra repo instead of having it in AUR? Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13702 -- Tomás A. Schertel

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 06.10.2010 19:39, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Tom wrote: >>> I'm seconding this. r300g is working exceptionally well compared to >>> r300 and it is very stable even with lots of 3D stuff and wine games. >>> I'd definitely want this to be the default in Arch. Per

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Tom wrote: >> I'm seconding this. r300g is working exceptionally well compared to >> r300 and it is very stable even with lots of 3D stuff and wine games. >> I'd definitely want this to be the default in Arch. Perhaps we should >> file a bug report. In fact, I will

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread Tom
> I'm seconding this. r300g is working exceptionally well compared to > r300 and it is very stable even with lots of 3D stuff and wine games. > I'd definitely want this to be the default in Arch. Perhaps we should > file a bug report. In fact, I will file one if we can get a few more > opinions on

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 06.10.2010 15:05, Stephen E. Baker wrote: >> My understanding is that r300g is the new default in Mesa 7.9. See >> http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-com...@lists.freedesktop.org/msg23390.html >> . Does this mean that Arch will automatically switch to it on release >> of Mesa or will extra steps

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread Stephen E. Baker
> My understanding is that r300g is the new default in Mesa 7.9. See > http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-com...@lists.freedesktop.org/msg23390.html > . Does this mean that Arch will automatically switch to it on release > of Mesa or will extra steps be required? As I understand it the PKGBUILD will

Re: [arch-general] Creation of startup scripts

2010-10-06 Thread Jeremiah Dodds
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Christian wrote: > I want to start my programs at boot time from /etc/rc.d > OK i will read up on bash scripting then and see what I can come up with! > I just want to understand what certain things mean and if I can leave them > out or not when I copy and use othe

Re: [arch-general] some notes on the radeon gallium driver

2010-10-06 Thread Jeff Cook
My understanding is that r300g is the new default in Mesa 7.9. See http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-com...@lists.freedesktop.org/msg23390.html . Does this mean that Arch will automatically switch to it on release of Mesa or will extra steps be required?