On 11/10/10 00:40, David C. Rankin wrote:
Normally that is a "Hey stupid, you have a drive failing... go fix it"
issue.
But it's not. smartctl is fine on all drives -- "no errors logged". Nothing in
syslog or dmesg, and the disks are clean.
I suppose you've looked around the smartctl F
On 11/09/2010 12:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 09.11.2010 19:25, schrieb David C. Rankin:
>> Guys,
>>
>> As a follow up, the post to kernel.org did not elicit any response. The
>> folks at dm-devel suggested it may be a grub bug. So that leave me with two
>> more
>> avenues to try (1) the
On 11/08/2010 07:49 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 11/08/2010 07:34 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 11/08/2010 03:14 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 11/07/2010 05:23 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
Anyone have issues changing from Xorg to one of the tty's? I've got a radeon
r600.
Mathhew,
I'll give it a
Am 09.11.2010 14:55, schrieb Gerhard Brauer:
> Hi,
Hi Gerhard, it is nice to hear from you after such a long time :)
> our current default wireless framework in base /e/rc.d/network
> script is iwconfig (Open/WEP only). I like to integrate
> wpa_supplicant as easy as we could use iwconfig ATM.
N
On 11/09/2010 12:45 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 09.11.2010 19:25, schrieb David C. Rankin:
Guys,
As a follow up, the post to kernel.org did not elicit any response. The
folks at dm-devel suggested it may be a grub bug. So that leave me with two more
avenues to try (1) the grub list, and (
Am 09.11.2010 19:25, schrieb David C. Rankin:
> Guys,
>
> As a follow up, the post to kernel.org did not elicit any response. The
> folks at dm-devel suggested it may be a grub bug. So that leave me with two
> more
> avenues to try (1) the grub list, and (2) lilo test.
https://wiki.archlinux
Guys,
As a follow up, the post to kernel.org did not elicit any response. The
folks at dm-devel suggested it may be a grub bug. So that leave me with two more
avenues to try (1) the grub list, and (2) lilo test.
I have also kept a running summary of the problem and input from the various
I have a wireless printer, which only takes WEP... Also, not all gateways
support WPA2 reliably (e.g. Verizon ActionTec devices).
On (11/09/10 17:19), Philipp Überbacher wrote:
-~> Would any sane person still use WEP if they have WPA2 available, which
-~> is most likely the case these days?
--
l
Excerpts from Gerhard Brauer's message of 2010-11-09 14:55:53 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> our current default wireless framework in base /e/rc.d/network
> script is iwconfig (Open/WEP only). I like to integrate
> wpa_supplicant as easy as we could use iwconfig ATM.
>
> iwconfig is a useless framework in mos
On 11/09/2010 03:55 PM, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Hi,
our current default wireless framework in base /e/rc.d/network
script is iwconfig (Open/WEP only). I like to integrate
wpa_supplicant as easy as we could use iwconfig ATM.
iwconfig is a useless framework in most user environments in these
days (
Hi,
our current default wireless framework in base /e/rc.d/network
script is iwconfig (Open/WEP only). I like to integrate
wpa_supplicant as easy as we could use iwconfig ATM.
iwconfig is a useless framework in most user environments in these
days (most AP's have a stronger encryption than WEP'),
FWIW:
I've gone through the archives and found multiple threads about our
cron discussions.
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-September/
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-January
(esp.
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-Ja
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 03/11/10 12:50, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/10 11:38, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> Another day, another glibc...
>>>
>>> This adjusts the static linking fix. The one previously used is a more
>>> correct fix but appears incomplete. I have
13 matches
Mail list logo
