On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
While looking through bugs for [core] packages, I notice that there are a
large number of bug report for these three packages. In total they account
for ~13% of the bugs in the tracker!
[...]
But given these are some of
Am 06.12.2010 11:39, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
While looking through bugs for [core] packages, I notice that there are a
large number of bug report for these three packages. In total they account
for ~13% of the bugs in the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch/commit/b4c804d60d6e8361db3f19bf3a2fa6fb58ee8458
Two short comments about this commit:
1) We need to run vgchange again after rw-mounting everything (without
--sysinit), so
Currently, if one wants to make a pkg, lets
say, for an app that only has binaries available
and only for 32bit archs, then one usually
makes a bin32-appname pkg for it. I don't
like this and would like to have the bin32
and the non-bin32 pkgs to be just one
pkg with the name of the app. But if
Am 06.12.2010 13:43, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch/commit/b4c804d60d6e8361db3f19bf3a2fa6fb58ee8458
Two short comments about this commit:
1) We need to run vgchange again after
On 2010/12/6 jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, if one wants to make a pkg, lets
say, for an app that only has binaries available
and only for 32bit archs, then one usually
makes a bin32-appname pkg for it. I don't
like this and would like to have the bin32
and the non-bin32
On 2010/12/6 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to assume that pacman and makepkg run on systems that are
either 32-bit or 64-bit. IMO, your proposal looks very ad hoc, and
would add unnecessary complications to makepkg, with no benefit when
dealing with PowerPC, ARM,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Thanks. The initscripts patch won't work though:
[[ $USELVM =~ yes|YES -x /sbin/lvm -d /sys/block ]] || return
return is a statement that will only work inside a function. I don't
know what it will do on the top
Scroll CLEAR down to the bottom for my response.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:02:27PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
On 10/20/2010 11:45 AM, maxc wrote:
There is an excellent post by Guido here, Hilton:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-February/011910.html
Guido seems to
The former ooo-build project go-openoffice is deprecated by
upstream developers in favor of the upcoming LibreOffice (LibO).
It's time to drop it from our repos while we are rebuilding all
OpenOffice branches for the icu-4.6 .so-bump.
Please use the vanilla Oracle openoffice-base packages or try
Den 06. des. 2010 18:27, skrev Steve Holmes:
Really please, please don't top post.
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
Who cares! it takes too long to scroll down through the past fifteen
generations to get to the relevant part of the message.
That no problem as you only keep the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Christoffer Hirth li...@toffyrn.net wrote:
Den 06. des. 2010 18:27, skrev Steve Holmes:
Really please, please don't top post.
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
Who cares! it takes too long to scroll down through the past fifteen
generations to
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:27 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
Really please, please don't top post.
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
Who cares! it takes too long to scroll down through the past fifteen
generations to get to the relevant part of the message.
If you're posting on an ML
Am 06.12.2010 16:48, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Thanks. The initscripts patch won't work though:
[[ $USELVM =~ yes|YES -x /sbin/lvm -d /sys/block ]] || return
return is a statement that will only work inside a function.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
I pushed everything to the official git tree.
Great!
There's one more thing about the check in the SWAP area of the crypttab
code: Instead of using isLuks to check for a LUKS device, check with
blkid whether there is
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 10:27 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
Scroll CLEAR down to the bottom for my response.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:02:27PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
Really please, please don't top post.
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
Who cares! it takes too long to scroll
On 07/12/10 11:52, Loui Chang wrote:
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 10:27 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
Scroll CLEAR down to the bottom for my response.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:02:27PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
Really please, please don't top post.
http://www.river.com/users/share/etiquette/
Who
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 23:24 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Top posting vs. going off topic without changing subject lines. I'm not
sure which is worse...
Bottom posting in Gmail is a pain in the ass. --Kaiting.
Get a better
18 matches
Mail list logo
