Hello,
I have updated the texlive non-binary packages to track the upstream
updates. You will find the detailed list of updated packages in the
attached file. The update should remain straightforward. I have
cleaned up the install scriptlet, hoping that it still works as
intended. Please notify
I'm trying to setup motion
http://www.lavrsen.dk/foswiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
at the moment since I didn't find anything interesting natively on OSX I
was trying to configure inside the virtual machine.
(this is the kernel Linux test 2.6.36-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Nov 24
00:39:57 CET 2010
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 14:35 +0100, Andrea Crotti wrote:
I'm trying to setup motion
http://www.lavrsen.dk/foswiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
at the moment since I didn't find anything interesting natively on OSX I
was trying to configure inside the virtual machine.
(this is the kernel Linux test
Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl writes:
Then there might be a bug in the rc.d script, did you check out what it
does?
Well the rc.d is correct actually, the problem is that with
killall motion motion doesn't quit, so the rc.d script
[ ! -z $PID ] kill $PID /dev/null
of course doesn't
On 9 January 2011 22:47, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl writes:
Then there might be a bug in the rc.d script, did you check out what it
does?
Well the rc.d is correct actually, the problem is that with
killall motion motion doesn't quit, so
Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org writes:
On 9 January 2011 22:47, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl writes:
Then there might be a bug in the rc.d script, did you check out what it
does?
Well the rc.d is correct actually, the problem is that with
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=955a857e062642cd3ebe1dc7bb38c0f85d8f8f17
kernel 2.6.37 from testing breaks ID mapping for me on the client side
(server is .32 LTS).
Is our kernel properly configured? I'm getting the
4294967294:4294967294 ownership
On 01/08/2011 04:21 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Seriously David, I think it's time for you to give up on kde3 already.
You can't expect the people on the Arch list to help support old, unsupported,
and out of date software. The more you bring your Arch box up to date the
less
and less
On 01/08/2011 01:20 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.37 currently
resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
6 boxes updated (4 i686 + 2 x86_64) - no problems. Even
Acabo de instalarme Arch 2010.05 desde cd y la verdad que me sorprendió
muchísimo su dinámica para instalarlo (no es complicado con un poco de
ayuda a la hora de instalar GNOME) y su velocidad, vengo de cansarme de
Ubuntu (¿soy yo solo o hay alguna persona que note algo oscuro en
Ubuntu?) y creo
El 09/01/11 08:15, dario dijo:
Acabo de instalarme Arch 2010.05 desde cd y la verdad que me sorprendió
muchísimo su dinámica para instalarlo (no es complicado con un poco de
ayuda a la hora de instalar GNOME) y su velocidad, vengo de cansarme de
Ubuntu (¿soy yo solo o hay alguna persona que
On 10/01/11 01:53, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
2011/1/9 cantabilecantabile.d...@gmail.com
Le 09/01/2011 04:12, Martín Cigorraga a écrit :
You need to enable the testing repo in /etc/abs.conf
--
cantabile
Jayne is a girl's name. -- River
It is indeed, look: REPOS=(core extra community
On 8 January 2011 19:20, Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Upstream update. This package is NOT in testing (2.6.37 currently
resides there), but at:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/kernel26/
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
We could do with the patch uploading to
13 matches
Mail list logo
