Re: [arch-general] Cannot install grub2 update from testing repo.

On 29/01/11 17:30, fredbezies wrote: I cannot install this update. I have this version of grub2 installed : [fred@fredo-arch-xfce ~]$ pacman -Qi grub2 Nom : grub2 Version : 1.98-5 And when I try a pacman -Syu, here is the error message I get : [fred@fredo-arch-

[arch-general] Cannot install grub2 update from testing repo.

I cannot install this update. I have this version of grub2 installed : [fred@fredo-arch-xfce ~]$ pacman -Qi grub2 Nom : grub2 Version : 1.98-5 And when I try a pacman -Syu, here is the error message I get : [fred@fredo-arch-xfce ~]$ sudo pacman -Syu :: Synchronis

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

On 01/27/2011 03:29 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.37 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - modules are now gzipped, this saves 70MB disk space > - added CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED=y >

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

2011/1/28 David C. Rankin > On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > >So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or > at > >>> > > Trinity? > >>> > > > >>> > > The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not? > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Yes! wiki it up! > > kde3 i

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree < > m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote: > >> On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote: >> >>> Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could >>> theoretically check in

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On 01/28/2011 11:30 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > >So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or at >>> > > Trinity? >>> > > >>> > > The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not? >>> > > >> > >> > Yes! wiki it up! > kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That

Re: [arch-general] New GRUB2 packages - any comments ?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 17:58, Kirill Churin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:55 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > >> Hi all, >>         I (skodabenz) and Ronald Van Haren (pressh) have put together >> a split PKGBUILD for grub2 including UEFI support (apart from standard >> BIOS firmware). >> >> The fi

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > > > On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin > > wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > > >As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I > > have > > > been keeping not

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Am 28.01.2011 22:37, schrieb Karol Babioch: > Hi, > > Am 28.01.2011 21:46, schrieb Thomas Bächler: >> you need to run it twice > > That doesn't work :(. It still says "fsck.ext4: No such file or > directory while trying to open /dev/raid/home". This is a (new?) lvm bug. If you edit rc.sysinit an

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Karol Babioch wrote: > While /dev/lvm/root gets really mounted, its getting /dev/mapper/lvm-var > which gets mounted for /var, seems quite odd for me? > > Can anyone elaborate on this? i dont know the exact reason, or where it's happening, but ultimately everythin

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Hi again, it seems to work now, but I had to put "/dev/mapper/raid-home" in the fstab, instead of "/dev/raid/home". I guess its time to ask for the difference between those both, because I never really got it. My guess would be that the first one comes from device mapper, while the second one is

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Hi, Am 28.01.2011 21:46, schrieb Thomas Bächler: > you need to run it twice That doesn't work :(. It still says "fsck.ext4: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/raid/home". When entering the maintenance console /dev/raid/home does exist and can easily be mounted either directly or

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Am 28.01.2011 21:35, schrieb Karol Babioch: > For me, it seems that this is something, which must be fixed within the > sysinit scripts, basically lvm2 has to be executed twice, after > encrypting the root partition and after encrypting devices according to > /etc/crypttab. Yes, it does. If you wa

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Hi, Am 28.01.2011 21:16, schrieb RekahSoft: > Have you taken a look at the archwiki? It helped me out.. I've taken a look at that and setup a few boxes with full system encryption already, however I can't find any useful information for the setup of this box, because /home is on another drive, wh

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Have you taken a look at the archwiki? It helped me out.. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/System_Encryption_with_LUKS_for_dm-crypt

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Karol Babioch wrote: > Am 28.01.2011 20:19, schrieb Tom Gundersen: >> notice that inside the >> crypttab stuff there is a call to activate_vgs > > What do you mean by that? Is it something I have to take care of, or > should it work automatically? The way I read t

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin > wrote: > > Guys, > > > >As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I > have > > been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that > > information up on a

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Hi, Am 28.01.2011 20:19, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > notice that inside the > crypttab stuff there is a call to activate_vgs What do you mean by that? Is it something I have to take care of, or should it work automatically? I think that my setup isn't that unrealistic, so I would like to have it su

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > >        As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have > been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that > information up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it > here on the A

Re: [arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Karol Babioch wrote: > Now, while the root lv gets mounted, the initscripts then tries to mount > anything within /etc/fstab, but here lies the problem, because the lvm2 > hook hasn't unlocked /dev/sdb1, because it is encrypted, and gets > unencrypted only afterwar

[arch-general] How to encrypt /home, so it gets mounted during boot

Hi, I've encrypted my /home partition (which lays on a raid), basically just for the fun of it ;). I'm now encountering a problem, which isn't that easy to solve as it seems to me :(. I've got the following setup: /dev/sda1 -> /boot /dev/sda2 -> encryption -> lvm -> / /dev/sdb1 -> encryption ->

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Isaac Dupree < m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org> wrote: > On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote: > >> Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could >> theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package >> with *insert malicio

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On 01/28/11 09:32, Jakob Gruber wrote: Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package with *insert malicious content* in it to the repos with a very low probability of anyone ever noticing. A (mandatory) cent

Re: [arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

On Friday 28 January 2011 17:20:40 David C. Rankin wrote: > As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have > been > keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that information > up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it here on the > A

[arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

Guys, As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that information up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it here on the Arch wiki, or do you want it over on the Trinity wiki?" It do

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Thomas S Hatch > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger >wrote: > > > > But with that said I feel very strongly that my wants as a commercial > user > > of Arch are not on par w

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > > But with that said I feel very strongly that my wants as a commercial user > of Arch are not on par with the needs of the Arch community in the manner, > in fact I would say tha

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 07:36 -0700, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > Excerpts from Ionuț Bîru's message of Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:57 +0200: > > > and with this, i rest my case. Cherry picking from testing is wrong > > and it should be all or nothing approach. > > I agree in general, but IMHO the kernel is

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD - howto handle 'src' when svn source is already in PKGBUILD dir?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:02 PM, David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > On 01/28/2011 02:57 AM, Kirill Churin wrote: > >> See how this is handled e.g. in this PKGBGUILD: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git/mesa-git/PKGBUILD >> >> > Thank you Kirill! > > So it looks

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

On 01/27/2011 11:29 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi guys, please signoff 2.6.37 series for both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Features included: - modules are now gzipped, this saves 70MB disk space - added CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED=y - aufs2.1 latest sna

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Thomas S Hatch > wrote: > > > > Jakob, YES! You are spot on here, one of the main motivations behind a > > system like this is security. While I don't think that this is a problem > > with our developers

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > Jakob, YES! You are spot on here, one of the main motivations behind a > system like this is security. While I don't think that this is a problem > with our developers, I do think that it is a potential future problem, Arch > is continuing

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD - howto handle 'src' when svn source is already in PKGBUILD dir?

On 01/28/2011 02:57 AM, Kirill Churin wrote: See how this is handled e.g. in this PKGBGUILD: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git/mesa-git/PKGBUILD Thank you Kirill! So it looks like I need to backup one (or two) directories and do the PKGBUILD higher up in the svn tree rather than

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

Thanks Allan, I will look at pacbuild. Jelle, as for AUR interactions, this would not be a primary use by any means, I think that serving the core Arch repos would be top priority. There are a lot of ideas about interacting with the AUR, but I think that resource wise and logistically it should i

Re: [arch-general] pacman-g2?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mathias Huber wrote: > Dear Cédric, > > >> Joey Hess's tool etckeeper > >> > > >> claims it works with 'pacman-g2'. Does anyone know

Re: [arch-general] pacman-g2?

Dear Cédric, >> Joey Hess's tool etckeeper >> >> claims it works with 'pacman-g2'. Does anyone know what kind of >> pacman version that is? >> >> Cheers, Mathias >> >> > Google has a lot of answers to this qu

Re: [arch-general] pacman-g2?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Mathias Huber wrote: > Dear Archers, > > Joey Hess's tool etckeeper > > > > claims it works with 'pacman-g2'. Does anyone know what kind of pacman > version that is? > > Cheers,

[arch-general] pacman-g2?

Dear Archers, Joey Hess's tool etckeeper claims it works with 'pacman-g2'. Does anyone know what kind of pacman version that is? Cheers, Mathias

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

Excerpts from Ionuț Bîru's message of Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:57 +0200: > and with this, i rest my case. Cherry picking from testing is wrong > and it should be all or nothing approach. I agree in general, but IMHO the kernel is different, I do not see any reason to not run whatever kernel people lik

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message of Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:29 +0100: > please signoff 2.6.37 series for both arches. signoff x86_64 Excerpts from Thomas Bächler's message of Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:20 +0100: > The kernel26 package lacks a versioned dependency on > module-init-tools Thanks, Th

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

Another aspect of this is security. Right now, any dev / TU could theoretically check in a correct PKGBUILD but upload a binary package with *insert malicious content* in it to the repos with a very low probability of anyone ever noticing. A (mandatory) central build server could guarantee that

Re: [arch-general] New GRUB2 packages - any comments ?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 18:34, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:55 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: >> Hi all, >>         I (skodabenz) and Ronald Van Haren (pressh) have put together >> a split PKGBUILD for grub2 including UEFI support (apart from standard >> BIOS firmware). >> > > You ask

Re: [arch-general] New GRUB2 packages - any comments ?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:55 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > Hi all, >         I (skodabenz) and Ronald Van Haren (pressh) have put together > a split PKGBUILD for grub2 including UEFI support (apart from standard > BIOS firmware). > You asked it in another thread but split PKGBUILD intended for the rep

Re: [arch-general] New GRUB2 packages - any comments ?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:55 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > Hi all, > I (skodabenz) and Ronald Van Haren (pressh) have put together > a split PKGBUILD for grub2 including UEFI support (apart from standard > BIOS firmware). > > The first PKGBUILD (all links at the end of this post) builds > grub

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 12:34 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:01 PM, C Anthony Risinger > >wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM

[arch-general] New GRUB2 packages - any comments ?

Hi all, I (skodabenz) and Ronald Van Haren (pressh) have put together a split PKGBUILD for grub2 including UEFI support (apart from standard BIOS firmware). The first PKGBUILD (all links at the end of this post) builds grub2-common which contains the utilities common for all the platforms

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

On 28/01/11 20:57, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 01/28/2011 10:20 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 28.01.2011 06:35, schrieb Sergey Manucharian: Hi Tobias, Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message of Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:29 +0100: please signoff 2.6.37 series for both arches. What I'm doing wrong with

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

On 01/28/2011 10:20 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 28.01.2011 06:35, schrieb Sergey Manucharian: Hi Tobias, Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message of Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:29 +0100: please signoff 2.6.37 series for both arches. What I'm doing wrong with new kernel installation? Currently I'm

Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

Just as an FYI, have a look a the old pacbuild project: http://projects.archlinux.org/pacbuild.git/ I have no idea how far along its development was, but it might give you some ideas.

Re: [arch-general] PKGBUILD - howto handle 'src' when svn source is already in PKGBUILD dir?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:57 AM, David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > I'm trying to figure out the best way to create a set of PKGBUILDs for the > Trinity svn tree. I already have the svn source on my computer. I can check > for > the latest version or svn up each

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.37-4

Am 28.01.2011 06:35, schrieb Sergey Manucharian: > Hi Tobias, > > Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message of Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:29 > +0100: > >> please signoff 2.6.37 series for both arches. > > What I'm doing wrong with new kernel installation? Currently I'm > running 2.6.37.1, trying to upd