Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/14/2011 07:32 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Just a quick question for you, as I understand it Trinity is basically a > fork of kde3. From your comments in this thread it does seem there is > some activity in the project. What's the plans of the project, an > indefinite maintenance of current functio

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-14 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 19:19 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 02/14/2011 09:33 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > So there is definitely a problem with gcc 4.5.2 > > (g++). > > Correction, > > There was a definite problem with the Trinity code after > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/14/2011 09:33 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > So there is definitely a problem with gcc 4.5.2 > (g++). Correction, There was a definite problem with the Trinity code after http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764 for gcc >=4.5 that rejected the existing class constructors in t

Re: [arch-general] netconf network configuration management system

2011-02-14 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > anyone ever looked at http://netconf.alioth.debian.org/ ? > > looks interesting.  I know a bunch of us are working on network management > tools (like netcfg and replacements for it), but that one seems to have a > good philosophy and sh

[arch-general] [signoff] udev-166-2

2011-02-14 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi guys. upstream release: udev 166 Bugfixes. please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[arch-general] netconf network configuration management system

2011-02-14 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
anyone ever looked at http://netconf.alioth.debian.org/ ? looks interesting. I know a bunch of us are working on network management tools (like netcfg and replacements for it), but that one seems to have a good philosophy and should be distro independent. Dieter

Re: [arch-general] Packages with update-desktop-database issues

2011-02-14 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:47:29 +0100 schrieb Matthias Dienstbier : > Hi, > > I recently found that wine doesn't run update-desktop-database > (FS#22882) but that's not the only package with this issue. > > I tested all my installed packages with this command: > for i in $(grep -Rl 'MimeType=.*/.*'

Re: [arch-general] How best to downgrade gcc to 4.4 or 4.3?

2011-02-14 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/13/2011 10:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> What other parts/packages do I need to downgrade, etc. to work with gcc-4.3? >> > > None - you probably need to rebuild earlier Trinity components with the older > gcc though. > > Allan Allan, Thanks -- that was the ticket. I rebuilt everything

[arch-general] Packages with update-desktop-database issues

2011-02-14 Thread Matthias Dienstbier
Hi, I recently found that wine doesn't run update-desktop-database (FS#22882) but that's not the only package with this issue. I tested all my installed packages with this command: for i in $(grep -Rl 'MimeType=.*/.*' /usr/share/applications/*); do pkg= $(LANG=C pacman -Qo "$i"); grep -L update-d

Re: [arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread D. Can Celasun
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:15:09 +0200 > "D. Can Celasun" wrote: > > > 2011/2/14 Lukáš Jirkovský > > > > > On 14 February 2011 13:43, D. Can Celasun > > > wrote: > > > > I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as > > >

Re: [arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:15:09 +0200 "D. Can Celasun" wrote: > 2011/2/14 Lukáš Jirkovský > > > On 14 February 2011 13:43, D. Can Celasun > > wrote: > > > I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as > > > "indicator-ejecter"[2] to follow the general naming convention > > > re

Re: [arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread D. Can Celasun
2011/2/14 Lukáš Jirkovský > On 14 February 2011 13:43, D. Can Celasun wrote: > > I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as > > "indicator-ejecter"[2] to follow the general naming convention regarding > > Ayatana packages [3] . Can someone please delete the original "ejecte

Re: [arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Monday 14 February 2011 12:43:04 D. Can Celasun wrote: > I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as > "indicator-ejecter"[2] to follow the general naming convention regarding > Ayatana packages [3] . Can someone please delete the original "ejecter" > package? > > [1] http:

Re: [arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 14 February 2011 13:43, D. Can Celasun wrote: > I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as > "indicator-ejecter"[2] to follow the general naming convention regarding > Ayatana packages [3] . Can someone please delete the original "ejecter" > package? > > [1] http://aur.arc

[arch-general] Package deletion request

2011-02-14 Thread D. Can Celasun
I've adopted, updated and reuploaded the "ejecter"[1] package as "indicator-ejecter"[2] to follow the general naming convention regarding Ayatana packages [3] . Can someone please delete the original "ejecter" package? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20493 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-ati, xbrightness and KMS bug

2011-02-14 Thread Fess
Thanks. -- With best wishes or hundreds of hate.

Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-ati, xbrightness and KMS bug

2011-02-14 Thread Mauro Santos
On 14-02-2011 09:40, Fess wrote: > Hi guys. > I've switched to xf86-video-ati from fgrlx and have some troubles with > changing brightness level. > xbrightness tells me: "No outputs have backlight property". > With fgrlx it worked like a charm. > If anyone have a solution - it will be great. > >

[arch-general] xf86-video-ati, xbrightness and KMS bug

2011-02-14 Thread Fess
Hi guys. I've switched to xf86-video-ati from fgrlx and have some troubles with changing brightness level. xbrightness tells me: "No outputs have backlight property". With fgrlx it worked like a charm. If anyone have a solution - it will be great. P.S. My keyboard dead now, so i have to use discr