Re: [arch-general] Question about automated builder

2011-02-17 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 06:25, Thomas S Hatch wrote: [...] > Heh, I like OCaml, but I chose Python for a few reasons, one was so that > more people could hack on it, I want it to be very modular, so for instance > it will be possible to make a variety of modules to watch different SCM > managers,

Re: [arch-general] Trinity Running on Arch Linux!

2011-02-17 Thread Peter Lewis
On Wednesday 16 February 2011 17:32:59 David C. Rankin wrote: > It works! After building kdebase (and fighting with other modules), I > just decided to start trinity and see if it would work. Changed ~/.xinitrc > to 'startkde' and then typed 'startx' and: > > http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/tri

[arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?

2011-02-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, Just a quick question on the vi dependency of mailx. Why not mailx-heirloom? It provides a great deal more capability with attachments, and flexibility as a cli mailer. The issues is down in the noise, but why drive a pinto if you can drive a jag? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?

2011-02-17 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2011 21:30 David C. Rankin wrote: > Just a quick question on the vi dependency of mailx. Why not mailx- heirloom? It > provides a great deal more capability with attachments, and flexibility as a cli > mailer. The issues is down in the noise, but why drive a pin

[arch-general] should kdepim-libkdepim-4.4.10-1 and kdepim-runtime-4.4.10-1 still be on the system with kde 4.6?

2011-02-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, Removing kde4 from a test box to work with Trinity, I ran across a few kde4 files that looked like they were orphans. I had already removed kde4 with: pacman -R kde gtk-kde4 kdebindings-smoke kdeplasma-addons-libs kmldonkey konq-plugins kopete-cryptography qtcurve-kde4 yakuake Checking

Re: [arch-general] should kdepim-libkdepim-4.4.10-1 and kdepim-runtime-4.4.10-1 still be on the system with kde 4.6?

2011-02-17 Thread Marek Otahal
On Thursday 17 of February 2011 23:01:00 David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > > Removing kde4 from a test box to work with Trinity, I ran across a few > kde4 files that looked like they were orphans. I had already removed kde4 > with: > > pacman -R kde gtk-kde4 kdebindings-smoke kdeplasma-addons-li

[arch-general] sanity check - pkgbuild writing svn rev as $pkgver for new packages - help?

2011-02-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, I'm working on a second set of pkgbuild for Trinity that do the svn download for you and work like normal pkgbuilds for other svn projects. One issue I'm having is getting the "finished package name" to include the svn revision as $pkgver instead of the initial (eg. pkgver=). The

Re: [arch-general] sanity check - pkgbuild writing svn rev as $pkgver for new packages - help?

2011-02-17 Thread Jan Steffens
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:10 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > >  I'm working on a second set of pkgbuild for Trinity that do the svn download > for you and work like normal pkgbuilds for other svn projects. > >  One issue I'm having is getting the "finished package name" to include the > svn

Re: [arch-general] sanity check - pkgbuild writing svn rev as $pkgver for new packages - help?

2011-02-17 Thread David C. Rankin
On 02/17/2011 06:31 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > makepkg includes some magic to adjust the $pkgver - however the > variables have to be named _svntrunk and _svnmod. See man PKGBUILD, > section DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIVES. > Thank you Jan, That is *exactly* what I was missing. I could have stared at:

[arch-general] Trinity - traditional PKGBUILD set done

2011-02-17 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, I have completed a set of traditional PKGBUILD scripts for Trinity that download the needed svn source and build the Trinity packages as usual rather than you needing to put the PKGBUILD script in the svn tree. The are normal tarballs that contain the PKGBUILDs and any patches needed. N