On 02/22/2011 08:41 PM, Uli Armbruster wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 02/22/2011 02:13 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 22.02.2011 12:35, schrieb Ionuț Bîru:
Hi,
The util-linux-ng project has been renamed back to util-linux.
Why 2.19-3? Shouldn't it be -1?
be
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote:
> No sign off from me (x86_64).
>
> After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version
> 2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system
> won't show up on /etc/mtab after you mount them.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote:
> No sign off from me (x86_64).
>
> After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version
> 2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system
> won't show up on /etc/mtab after you mount them.
>
> Do
On 02/23/2011 07:31 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote:
No sign off from me (x86_64).
After I upgrade to the latest util-linux package from testing (version
2.19-3), I can no longer unmount FUSE file system because FUSE file system
won't show up on /
In that case, ignore my email :-) I must have remembered wrong...
Sorry for the noise.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Smith Dhumbumroong wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 07:31 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 17:43, Smith Dhumbumroong
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> No sign off from me (x86_64).
>
Guys,
Albert Vaca has built kdemod3 updates with the Trinity 3.5.12 (stable) code
base. The repository for the binaries is:
[kdemod3]
Server = http://rapinjam.com/beta/lefa/kdemod3/i686/
or
[kdemod3]
Server = http://rapinjam.com/beta/lefa/kdemod3/x86_64/
I updated an i686 box last night af
On 02/22/2011 06:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was also the
> only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out, there are other
> distros using that patch without reported issue and it is now in glibc
> mainline
> so nothing
Hi there.
I'm playing with digital photos atm., found ufraw and found that it's
out of date since a long while.
Here's my take on updating it:
# $Id: PKGBUILD 96307 2010-10-19 21:03:01Z ibiru $
# Maintainer: Tobias Kieslich
pkgname=gimp-ufraw
_srcname=ufraw
pkgver=0.18
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Standalo
On 02/23/2011 01:38 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/22/2011 06:41 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> That prelink patch is very, very unlikely to cause the issue. It was also
>> the
>> only change between 2.13-3 and 2.13-4... As I pointed out, there are other
>> distros using that patch without report
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Philipp wrote:
> Hi there.
> I'm playing with digital photos atm., found ufraw and found that it's
> out of date since a long while.
> Here's my take on updating it:
>
> # $Id: PKGBUILD 96307 2010-10-19 21:03:01Z ibiru $
> # Maintainer: Tobias Kieslich
>
> pkgname
On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining
> about corruption?
>
> #8 0x7f3550d27b96 in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x7f3550dd6a2e
> "malloc(): memory corruption", ptr=) at malloc.c:6283
> #9 0x7f3550d2
Hi guys,
I'm looking through initscripts to make sure systemd is compatible. In
doing so I think I ran across the following possible simplification of
rc.sysinit.
Comments? I'd be especially interested in hearing about usecases where
the attached patch would lead to regressions.
-
Running d
On 24/02/11 10:15, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining
about corruption?
#8 0x7f3550d27b96 in malloc_printerr (action=3, str=0x7f3550dd6a2e
"malloc(): memory corruption", ptr=) at
On 02/23/2011 07:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 24/02/11 10:15, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 02/23/2011 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>> I have no idea what the error means, but it looks like malloc is complaining
>>> about corruption?
>>>
>>> #8 0x7f3550d27b96 in malloc_printerr (action=3
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:38:42 +1000 Allan McRae wrote:
> If this is virtualbox specific, I'd try qemu-kvm.
If you want to do this than this can save your time:
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/convert-virtualbox-vdi-to-kvm-qcow
Personally i would use qed with the new qemu-kmv 0.14.0 instead of
q
15 matches
Mail list logo
