On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Thomas Misilo wrote:
> I am using the directions on the New Mirror page, as we are looking to
> eventually opening the mirror to the public. Symlinks are intact in the
> different directories linking to pool, so that isn't an issue.
no worries, i didn't expect i
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:01:25 -0500 (EST) Jude DaShiell wrote:
> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages
> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground
> area
Before doing this i suggest to name it:
needless_sh**_for_non_latex_users_bought_from_the_dar
Hi,
I've set up MPD with an additional http stream. Default for the encoding
engine seems to be "vorbis". However it seems to be extreme buggy, at
least for me. I've tried it as stand alone output, as well as in
combination with pulse.
It crashed quite irregularly during the normal playback, but
Hi, I was checking the wiki license, that says GNU FDL 1.2, but links to
GNU FDL 1.3, so... which one should I pick? :)
--
Salud!
Nicolás Reynolds,
xmpp:fa...@kiwwwi.com.ar
omb:http://identi.ca/fauno
blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/
gnu/linux user #455044
OTR: C0CB1F0F 01DB5E18 2D634C2A A4626858 E7
Am Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:29:18 -0500 (EST)
schrieb Jude DaShiell :
> So as long as the libriopenoffice is in (o) other packages having a
> need for some flavor of openoffice depending on arch-linux
> dependencies policy would take the official packages first. If
> that's the case such naming convent
I am using the directions on the New Mirror page, as we are looking to
eventually opening the mirror to the public. Symlinks are intact in the
different directories linking to pool, so that isn't an issue.
Thanks,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org
[mail
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
wrote:
> ti, 2011-03-08 kello 18:39 -0500, Thomas Misilo kirjoitti:
>
>> Good Evening,
>>
>> I was trying to use a custom mirror during an install today, it is only a
>> HTTP server currently. Is this a problem, does it need to be ftp? As the
>>
So as long as the libriopenoffice is in (o) other packages having a need
for some flavor of openoffice depending on arch-linux dependencies policy
would take the official packages first. If that's the case such naming
conventions would be unnecessary.On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, ??? wrote:
> 2011/3/9 J
8 matches
Mail list logo