Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-04-02 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - latest stable patches > - disabled /dev/kmem > - added AMD_IOMMU support > - kernel image

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-04-02 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Sergey Manucharian's message from Sat 02-Apr-11 18:27: > Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Thu 31-Mar-11 07:40: > > signoff x86_64 Sorry, my reply was too quick - I didn't tested thoroughly... There are still artefacts in X terminals, e.g. when composing mutt messages

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-04-02 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Tobias Powalowski's message from Thu 31-Mar-11 07:40: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - latest stable patches > - disabled /dev/kmem > - added AMD_IOMMU support > - ke

Re: [arch-general] Can a ISP modify incoming http traffic to display ads using transparent proxy server ?

2011-04-02 Thread Harry Strongburg
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:21:33AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I suggest you install addblocker in the firefox add-ons. That would "work", but would not solve the main issue being that you are paying for your ISP -and- getting assaulted by their ads, which should not be done.

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38.2-1

2011-04-02 Thread Jan Steffens
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > please signoff 2.6.38 series for both arches. > > Upstream > changes: > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > Features included: > - latest stable patches > - disabled /dev/kmem > - added AMD_IOMMU support > - kernel image

Re: [arch-general] Can a ISP modify incoming http traffic to display ads using transparent proxy server ?

2011-04-02 Thread Jude DaShiell
I suggest you install addblocker in the firefox add-ons. On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:15 +0530, Partha Chowdhury wrote: > > My ISP is running a transparent proxy server on port 80 as I found out > > from this thread > > > > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipe

Re: [arch-general] Can a ISP modify incoming http traffic to display ads using transparent proxy server ?

2011-04-02 Thread Jan de Groot
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:15 +0530, Partha Chowdhury wrote: > My ISP is running a transparent proxy server on port 80 as I found out > from this thread > > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2011-March/019172.html > > Now from last two or three days, I keep getting pop-up ads fro

Re: [arch-general] Can a ISP modify incoming http traffic to display ads using transparent proxy server ?

2011-04-02 Thread Partha Chowdhury
On 02/04/11 12:38, Isaac Dupree wrote: What happens if you go to an https: site? The data generally cannot be modified between the server and your browser in that case. Also... your in-browser proxy choice works around the ISP proxy? Interesting. (Is the cable operator trying to be unpopula

Re: [arch-general] Can a ISP modify incoming http traffic to display ads using transparent proxy server ?

2011-04-02 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 04/02/11 02:45, Partha Chowdhury wrote: My ISP is running a transparent proxy server on port 80 as I found out from this thread http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2011-March/019172.html Now from last two or three days, I keep getting pop-up ads from a particular domain on ev