On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net wrote:
I like having volume control for HDMI out. And I like that this mysterious
starving audio, playing silence, glitch has disappeared. But I don't like
that pulse uses so much CPU and i think it's a major reason why my
On 04/08/2011 12:11 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net wrote:
I like having volume control for HDMI out. And I like that this mysterious
starving audio, playing silence, glitch has disappeared. But I don't like
that pulse uses so much
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:16:46 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
cron daemon, but no need for a default cron daemon. It's pretty the
same issue as with
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:31 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis
grb...@xsmail.comwrote:
I guess you mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/32759
Thanks for the link, I did not want to bring up
On Friday 08 April 2011 09:44:14 Jelle van der Waa wrote:
SELinux would maybe bring extra security too archlinux, but what I don't
see in this thread is how much harder / more bugs it would make for
developers/TU's to package if you use SELinux.
Good point.
So in general what is the
Hi Guys,
I'm attempting to create my own Arch Live CD and I can't get the archiso
hook to complete successfully.
In March 2010, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi removed the archiso_early hook from
archiso.git, which used to mount /dev/archiso (I'm not entirely sure what
this pointed to, but it's clearly
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want.
That's why AppArmor /Tomoyo are nicer solutions cause they don't require
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
cron daemon, but no need for a default cron daemon. It's pretty the
same issue as
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:45:29 -0400
Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:42:25 +0100
schrieb Tom medhurst tom.medhu...@gmail.com:
I'm attempting to create my own Arch Live CD and I can't get the
archiso hook to complete successfully.
In March 2010, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi removed the archiso_early hook
from archiso.git, which used to mount
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:45:29 -0400
Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different
Thanks Heiko!
That bug contains the same error message, but not sure it's for the same
reason. /dev/sr0 doesn't appear either for me.
For clarity, is /dev/disk/by-label/MY_LABEL supposed to point to my
installation CD, so isomounts can be loaded? Is that what this is trying to
do?
I did get a
On 08/04/11 20:43, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waaje...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want.
That's why AppArmor /Tomoyo are nicer
/lib/udev/rules.d/ contains 60-cdrom_id.rules which looks for cdroms and
makes them /dev/sr#. So I'm guessing it's not seeing the disk that the
initrd is loaded from?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Tom medhurst tom.medhu...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Heiko!
That bug contains the same error
On 08/04/11 07:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
But let's try to get objective again.
No need. A new cron for [core] has to pass only one condition... :)
1) a developer is willing to maintain it.
So far that seems to be Thomas and fcron.
Anyway, I recall mention in our bug report of a patch being
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
In my opinion, SELinux would be better supported in a user provided repo.
Work with the guy (whose name I can not remember...) who has done an
awesome job getting this all done and into the AUR.
Okay I don't know a thing
Hi guys,
Can't pulseaudio be moved to optdepends?
Best,
Bernardo
On 08/04/11 22:54, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Hi guys,
Can't pulseaudio be moved to optdepends?
No. It is an upstream requirement.
Dne pátek 08 dubna 2011 12:43:51 Kaiting Chen napsal(a):
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want.
That's why AppArmor
Nicky726 wrote:
If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply for TU
and bring SELinux packages to community in the summer, to make using SELinux
easier.
I dont think thats gonna work since you'll have to provide the same
packages as in [core] built differently.
On 09/04/11 00:24, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Nicky726 wrote:
If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply for TU
and bring SELinux packages to community in the summer, to make using SELinux
easier.
I dont think thats gonna work since you'll have to provide the same
Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 09/04/11 00:24, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Nicky726 wrote:
If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply for
TU
and bring SELinux packages to community in the summer, to make using SELinux
easier.
I dont think thats gonna
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:16:46 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
cron
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 08/04/11 07:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
But let's try to get objective again.
No need. A new cron for [core] has to pass only one condition... :)
1) a developer is willing to maintain it.
So far that seems to be
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne pátek 08 dubna 2011 12:43:51 Kaiting Chen napsal(a):
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl
wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users
Title says it all
I installed it today. I even thought it wouldn't start, but it did, eventually
$ miro --debug
DEBUGGING MODE.
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software:
On 04/06/2011 10:34 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Upstream stability makes sense. If redhat is behind cronie, then that
seems like the logical choice.
Why is this logical? Is it the developer what makes a software good or
is it the features and the stability? If Redhat's cronie has less
features
Fixed it. This problem seems to generally mean there is problem with the
kernel image.
I built my own with mkinitcpio and everything is hunky-dory now :)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Tom medhurst tom.medhu...@gmail.comwrote:
/lib/udev/rules.d/ contains 60-cdrom_id.rules which looks for
On Friday, April 08, 2011 05:43:51 Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want.
That's why AppArmor
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Yaro Kasear y...@marupa.net wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 05:43:51 Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl
wrote:
And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should
Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0600
schrieb Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com:
Yaro makes many good points, I think that my recommendation would be
to allow someone to maintain support for SELinux in community. If
SELinux support is deemed something that would be a good idea to move
to core in
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I'd prefer a separate [selinux] repo. So that people know what they are
doing.
+1 from a users perspective, the changes in a machine's setup from non-SE to
SE are non-trivial to the point that a separate repo would make
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:20 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
Title says it all
I installed it today. I even thought it wouldn't start, but it did, eventually
$ miro --debug
DEBUGGING MODE.
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:08 -0400, Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I'd prefer a separate [selinux] repo. So that people know what they are
doing.
+1 from a users perspective, the changes in a machine's setup from non-SE to
On 09/04/11 00:53, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 09/04/11 00:24, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Nicky726 wrote:
If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply for TU
and bring SELinux packages to community in the summer, to make using
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 09/04/11 00:53, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 09/04/11 00:24, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Nicky726 wrote:
If I may add more to this SELinux related thread, I would like to aply
On 04/08/2011 02:11 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Monacodgbale...@verizon.net wrote:
I like having volume control for HDMI out. And I like that this mysterious
starving audio, playing silence, glitch has disappeared. But I don't like
that pulse uses so much
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Anyway, I still see nothing wrong with creating SELinux packages and having
them available in [community], although I would like to see a separate repo
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net wrote:
On 04/08/2011 02:11 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Monacodgbale...@verizon.net
wrote:
I like having volume control for HDMI out. And I like that this
mysterious
starving audio,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Matthew Monaco dgbale...@verizon.net wrote:
On 04/08/2011 02:11 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Monacodgbale...@verizon.net
wrote:
But I don't like that pulse uses so much CPU and i think it's a major
reason why
my computer
40 matches
Mail list logo
