Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Arthur Titeica
On Sunday 24 April 2011 23:34:41 Ionut Biru wrote: > On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote: > > On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: > >> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano > >> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote: >> >> On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: >>> >>> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano >>> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor pac

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Ionut Biru
On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote: On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in testing. Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Arthur Titeica
On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: > All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano > pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in > testing. Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland- compat. From your m

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Andreas Radke
All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in testing. -Andy

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.39-1

2011-04-24 Thread Andreas Radke
Upstream update. Contains security fix(es). Added a gcc46 buildfix that went upstream in 2.6.38 tree. Please give signoffs. -Andy

Re: [arch-general] ARCH .y kernel releases do not match kernel.org's

2011-04-24 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 04/24/2011 03:07 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: Am Sonntag 24 April 2011 schrieb Emmanuel Benisty: Hi, I was having some sound issue with ARCH 2.6.38.3 stock kernel so I started to bisect it from Greg KH's 2.6.38.y stable tree. .38.2 w

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Sunday 24 April 2011 12:10:22 Ray Rashif wrote: >> It would just mean we would have lone updated redland/raptor packages, >> just so things can tango along with KDE. Otherwise, the particular KDE >> functionality can be removed. It is up

Re: [arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

2011-04-24 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Sunday 24 April 2011 12:10:22 Ray Rashif wrote: > It would just mean we would have lone updated redland/raptor packages, > just so things can tango along with KDE. Otherwise, the particular KDE > functionality can be removed. It is up to Andrea in that case. The redland backend is used by kdelib

Re: [arch-general] ARCH .y kernel releases do not match kernel.org's

2011-04-24 Thread Emmanuel Benisty
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Am Sonntag 24 April 2011 schrieb Emmanuel Benisty: >> Hi, >> >> I was having some sound issue with ARCH 2.6.38.3 stock kernel so I >> started to bisect it from Greg KH's 2.6.38.y stable tree. >> .38.2 was good and .38.3 was bad (so I thou